Submitted by Quinzel (BU looks forward to the BU intelligentsia translating this submission)
Mystery
It is a Mystery.

Here is valuable wisdom! If you rule your speech, you will save yourself from trouble. Your mouth and tongue are two of your greatest enemies. If you will keep them under control and only speak the right words at the right time, your life will be blessed. It is unruled speech that gets men into all sorts of trouble. Here is wisdom for a good life.

You can get into trouble by filthy talking, foolish talking, and jesting. You can damage your reputation, hurt others’ feelings, and waste time with such talking. God despises such speech, though they are very popular with the present generation; and He is coming soon to judge the world for these very sins (Pr 14:9; 26:18-19; Eccl 7:6; Eph 4:29; 5:3-7).

You can get into trouble talking negatively about others. Men will know you are wicked, and you will create enmity and strife. Though easy to commit, the blessed God hates backbiting, slander, talebearing, and whispering. They are much like murder, in that they destroy another’s reputation (Pr 10:18; 11:13; 16:28; 18:8; 20:19; 25:23; 26:20-22).

You can get into trouble by complaining. Who likes a complainer? The LORD hates complaining, and He judges it severely (Num 11:1; Ps 106:24-27). Jesus Christ is coming soon with angels to judge complainers (Jude 1:14-16). It is God’s will for your mouth and tongue to give thanks (Phil 2:14; Col 3:17; I Thes 5:18). This generation is unthankful, so God has judged the world with darkness and sodomy (Rom 1:20-27; II Tim 3:2).

You can get into trouble by over committing. Solomon warned his son about taking on the obligations of others as a surety, such as cosigning loans hastily or extensively (Pr 6:1-5; 22:26-27). It is so easy and thrilling to offer your guarantee for the performance of another, because it gives you an important role in their lives. But wisdom should guard your mouth from creating unnecessary and excessive obligations (Pr 22:3; I Cor 7:32).

You can get into trouble by vows to God. In the difficulties of a painful situation, it is easy to promise things to God to persuade Him to deliver you. But the Lord warns against such oaths (Eccl 5:1-3). It is better not to vow at all, than to vow and not pay (Eccl 5:4-7).

You can get into trouble by name calling. Jesus Christ taught that name calling without a holy cause was a violation of the sixth commandment, the law against murder (Matt 5:21-22). Railing and reviling, which are name calling and abusive language, are condemned by Scripture (Ex 22:28; I Cor 5:11; 6:10; I Pet 3:9). A child that cursed his parents died under Moses’ law (Pr 20:20; Ex 21:17; Lev 20:9; Deut 27:16). Take that Hollywood!

You can get into trouble by lying. Everyone hates a liar. No one can trust a liar. Severe punishments are reserved for liars and perjurers. And all liars shall spend eternity in the lake of fire (Rev 21:8,27; 22:15). Honesty in all situations is not only the best policy; it is the holy requirement of the God of truth (Pr 12:22; Ex 20:16; Lev 19:11; Eph 4:25).

You can get into trouble by disrespecting authority. Do not curse the king even in your thoughts or bedroom (Eccl 10:20). A little bird will carry the wicked words, and you will be in trouble. God despises those who speak evil of rulers (II Pet 2:10-12; Jude 1:8-10). Children must honor parents, wives their husbands, employees their employers, and church members their pastors (Eph 5:33; 6:1-3; I Thes 5:12-13; Titus 2:9-10; I Pet 3:5-6).

You can get into trouble by arguing and debate. Wise men listen rather than talk (Pr 17:27-28; Eccl 7:5). A woman should avoid contention and emphasize kindness (Pr 19:13; 21:19; 27:15; 31:26). God’s ministers reject foolish and unlearned questions, for they are the marks of fools and scorners (I Tim 1:4; 4:7; 6:3-5; II Tim 2:14,16,23; Titus 3:9). Wise men study before talking (Pr 15:28), especially God’s ministers (II Tim 2:15).

You can get in trouble by hurting those around you. Spouses, children, and friends can easily be hurt by cutting words (Pr 12:18; Eph 6:4; Col 3:19). Harsh words stir up anger and cause fights to escalate (Pr 15:1). Relationships are destroyed, bitterness created, and your future dulled by hard words. It is men and women with gracious speech that will be held in high esteem (Pr 11:16; 22:11). It is a command to use gracious words (Col 4:6).

How can you avoid trouble with your mouth and tongue? First, cut your words in half, for many words always contain sin (Pr 10:19). Second, slow down and emphasize listening before speaking (Pr 29:20; Jas 1:19). Third, remember that you will give an account for every idle word and be judged for your words (Matt 12:34-37). Fourth, pray like David, “Set a watch, O LORD, before my mouth; keep the door of my lips” (Ps 141:3).

Rather than trouble, the man who guards his mouth and tongue will enjoy the good life, guaranteed by the infallible word of God. “What man is he that desireth life, and loveth many days, that he may see good? Keep thy tongue from evil, and thy lips from speaking guile” (Ps 34:12-13). Peter also quoted these wonderful words of promise (I Pet 3:10).

There was never trouble for the Lord Jesus Christ by His mouth and tongue. He spoke like no other man in world history (Ps 45:2; Isaiah 50:4; Luke 4:22; John 7:46). He could comfort a widow at her only son’s funeral, or he could expose Pharisee heresy to the delight of His audience (Luke 7:11-18; Matt 7:28-29). There was nothing to charge Him for at His trial, so the Jews falsely accused Him by perverting His pure words (Matt 26:59-61). His pure words will soon judge them for their sins (Matt 7:21-23).

272 responses to “Whoso Keepeth His Mouth and His Tongue Keepeth His Soul From Troubles”


  1. Porgie, thank you for informing my understanding, regarding an issue that I am not ashamed to say that I haven’t the prerequisite understanding of.


  2. @Milla

    “until you can tell us who made your GOD then your “Judeo –Christian religion” based on stories plagiarized from the ‘books of other older religions, myths and obvious lies cannot be taken seriously either.”

    WHO PLAGIARIZED – “In the BEGINNING GOD CREATED”…?

    Oooooops sorry son!

    It should have “READ” – “in the beginning man created himself from some BLOB of protoplasm which was given its electrification caused by the “big bang”.

    We can argue where writing began!

    What and where was the 1st black board? LOL

    We could argue who were the NEPHILIM?

    We could argue life before or after the FLOOD!

    We could also argue the mind-blowing accuracy of BIBLE PROPHECY and for the record –

    “Can someone on here PLEASE explain how a slave boy 4000 years ago, down in the 1st world empire (BABYLON) – was able to tell a king what he dreamt and interpreted it and gave the dream “PROPHETIC” resonance for the future – right down to our present day!

    PLEASE EXPLAIN DANIEL CHAPTER 2 given the galactic telescope of HISTORY and how it has played out over 4 millennia!


  3. re PLEASE EXPLAIN DANIEL CHAPTER 2 given the galactic telescope of HISTORY and how it has played out over 4 millennia!
    this was done here on BU YEARS AGO!…..AND IN SOME DETAIL!


  4. EVEN “UNhollywood” HAS GOT IT RIGHT! IF YOU BELIEVE NONE OF WHAT YOU WRITTEN, SEEN, TASTE OR FELT – AT LEAST BELIEVE THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES!


  5. The members of the MESSIAH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL speculate that the world as we know it will cease to exist in 2026.

    In 2026, according to this prophesy, a large comet will collide with our planet Earth.

    The calculations are based on Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi’s predictions given in his book “The Religion of God.”

    Read more at http://news.nster.com/content585.html?utm_source=social&utm_medium=direct&utm_campaign=c5319&utm_term=p150&b=3#M3MlFOLwTSKW8yZe.99


  6. @ Miller
    “until you can tell us who made your GOD then your “Judeo –Christian religion” based on stories plagiarized from the ‘books of other older religions, myths and obvious lies cannot be taken seriously either.

    Come on Boss man….and you have Annunuki in your name…? Sometime your simple mindedness is stunning indeed……

    Skippa…
    The very epistemological construct of “making” something should provide you the answer to your question.
    Obviously “making” or “bringing into being” is a concept that is inextricably tied to the concept of TIME. Therefore, at some point of time T, something which did not exist before – comes into being and is said to be “made” or created.

    This is how life as we know it came to exist for example…
    But FIRST of all the concept of TIME needed to come into existence. This is why the bible says that “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God….”

    Translated….
    When Time itself was created (in the beginning at T=0) God already was, and its Creator was one of these personalities….

    …so perhaps there is an intelligent question to be asked about the nature of God, but it surely is NOT “who made God….”

    LOL
    BBE PRE-DATED….and even MADE the concept of “making”…… 🙂

    GOD exists In a realm that is NOT subject to time (or space as we know it, or indeed to entropy)

    BTW Mark Lexicon..
    That is what you can call an ontological response to Miller…
    LOL…..look it up…


  7. BT…….A mouthfull…..saying what???…..conjecture and more conjecture……and never the twain shall meet….enjoy…


  8. Miller, Here’s a scratch of the brilliant scientific brains, who support the ‘Young Earth’ concept, that lines up with God’s creation narrative, as found in Genesis. There is also tons of scientific rational evidence by Creationist scientists, who debunk the atheist mindset of other intellectually dishonest scientist, WHO present their pseudo-science against the evidence of a ‘Young Earth’ NOT in true science methodology, BUT, in ‘Philosophical’ terms, which IS* NOT true science!

    “The existence of short period comets suggests that our solar system is less than 10,000 years old: otherwise they would have burned out long ago.”

    “More evidence of a young Universe is given in reference 21 below. See also the Astronomy section of the Young Age of Earth and Universe Q&A page on the http://www.answersingenesis.org web site.”

    The Earth’s Magnetic Field:
    “The Earth’s magnetic field is decaying at the rate of about 5% every 100 years. This means that about 1450 years ago it was twice as strong as it is today, and 2900 years ago it was four times as strong. Therefore, assuming that the rate of decay has been constant for the recent past, then only 10,000 years ago the earth’s magnetic field would have been 128 times as strong as it is today: so strong that the amount of heat produced would have prevented life as we know it from existing on earth. 23,24,25,26 In other words, it seems likely that the Earth’s magnetic field is quite young, and suggests that the earth itself is also young.”

    “The fact that the earth’s magnetic field is decaying is well documented. This was brought out by a recent NOVA Special. In fact, at present rates of decay, the earth may not even have a magnetic field 1000 years from now. And although, the NOVA special strongly suggested that this may simply mean the earth is getting ready for another reversal, such may not be the case, as Dr. Humphreys work suggests. A brief portion of Dr. Humphreys findings are quoted below”.

    “Shortly after that I published a review of the evidence for past polarity reversals, reaffirming their reality (Humphreys, 1988). Then I developed my dynamic-decay theory further, showing that rapid (meters per second) motions of the core fluid would indeed cause rapid reversals of the field’s polarity (Humphreys, 1990). I cited newly discovered evidence for rapid reversals (Coe and Prévot, 1989), evidence in thin lava flows confirming my 1986 prediction. Since then, even more such evidence has become known (Coe, Prévot, and Camps, 1995).”

    “The reversal mechanism of my theory would dissipate magnetic energy, not sustain it or add to it, so each reversal cycle would have a lower peak than the previous one. In the same paper (Humphreys, 1990, p. 137), I discussed the non-dipole part of the field today, pointing out that the slow (millimeter per second) motions of the fluid today could increase the intensity of some of the non-dipole parts of the field. However, I concluded (that) … the total energy of the field would still decrease.”

    “Despite these … answers, skeptics today still use Dalrymple’s old arguments to dismiss geomagnetic evidence. Much of that is probably due to ignorance of our responses, but some skeptics are still relying on the non-dipole part of the field. They hope that an energy gain in the non-dipole part will compensate for the energy lost from the dipole part.”

    “I said, “hope,” because it appears that since 1967, nobody has yet published a calculation of non-dipole energies based on newer and better data. So that is what I will do below. It turns out that the results quash evolutionist hopes and support creationist models.” 27

    “Another major problem with old-earth beliefs in this regard is the timing of the earth’s last reversal. Old earth believers claim that it took place 780,000 years ago; however, at current rates of decay, only about 10,000 years ago the earth would have been so hot that no life could have survived on its surface. And even if we assume that in the past the earth’s magnetic field decayed much slower than today, we are still only looking at about 20,000 years ago that life could have existed on the earth. This indicates that old-earth dates for the earth’s past magnetic reversals (arrived at using radiometric method) are probably incorrect, and suggests that the assumptions used in old-earth (radiometric) dating were (and are) incorrect.” http://www.earthage.org.


  9. LOL @ Vincent
    That was for Miller…
    …don’t go and hurt yourself trying to follow that post now ya hear…?
    When you are ready we can explore the Cawmere version…


  10. bt stop talking hogwash ‘Time came into being”” time is intangible and invisible,,,,,,, What concept,,,,,,,,,time was not design or created by any one person or force ,,,,,, time is the ultimate dictator and disciplinarian of all that is in the universe,,, dictates and decides when we get here! ! !and when we go! , TIME has been and will always be having no beginning or no ending.,,uh need to stop spreading untruths…….


  11. here is another ridiculous nonsensical pseudo gobbly gook……please explain..

    GOD exists In a realm that is NOT subject to time (or space as we know it, or indeed to entropy)………..what de hell does that mean……….ever thing that was and still is being created evolves and revolves around TIME…….making it the be all and end all that is in.the universe,,,,, without time there would be no structure didn’t God use TIME as a major factor in the creation with a starting and ending point according to scripture,,


  12. Nuskie, Your stupid, ignorant, humanist question, “Who created God” is as foolish as when ROK, years ago here on BU, asked me, “How is Omnipotence, Omniscience achieved…”

    Man, Omnipotence, Omniscience, Omnipresence, eternality, IS* just IS* always WAS, always WILL BE; that;s beyond our finite, futile minds!

    The ENTIRE UNIVERSE, trillions of Galaxies, and ALL life, therein, were Created by The WORD of God, The LORD JESUS CHRIST, and ARE literally SUSTAINED, HELD TOGETHER, by HIS WORD!

    “For BY HIM ALL THINGS were Created that are in heaven and that are ON earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. ALL THINGS were CREATED through HIM and for HIM. And HE is BEFORE all things, and IN* HIM ALL THINGS CONSIST.” (Col. 1: 16,17)

    ‘Before ALL THINGS” ( pro panton) PRO with the ablative case. This phrase makes the meaning plain. It pronounces the PRECEDENCE of Christ in time AND His PREEMINENCE as Creator, and are both stated sharply. See the claim of Jesus to ETERNAL timeless EXISTENCE in John 8:58; 17:5. See also Rev, 23:13 where Christ calls Himself the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning ( arche) and the End ( telos).

    ‘Consist” (sunesteken) Pefect active indicative (intransitive) of ‘sunistemi’ old verb, to PLACE TOGETHER, and here to COHERE, to HOLD TOGETHER. ( Word Pictures in The New Testament, Vol IV, pp. 478,479)

    In other words, the ENTIRE POWER, FORCE, ….words FAIL completely here to even begin to capture, or convey the ABSOLUTE OMNIPOTENCE of JESUS, that HOLDS TOGETHER, COHERES, every single Atom, Proton, etc, in ALL THINGS that He* CREATED and SUSTAINS; and ‘IF’ He were to release His WORD of Omnipotence, EVERYTHING in the Universe, and here on Earth, mankind included, would go PUFF!!!


  13. the nonsense i see written on here!
    reality is——-http://youtu.be/1JNrvujpVFk


  14. Let’s face it, there is just no empirical basis to prove the existence of God. Anyone who has studied philosophy as does theology would have known that there isn’t any empirical evidence to justify the existence of a metaphysical God through an objectified reality. So how did the Jewish philosopher/ theologian Moses Miamonides as well as the Germany philosopher Emanuel Kant, who bridged the gap between the empiricist/ rationalist philosophical prospectives did: well the both of them appealed to Reason to proved the existence of God. Miamonides wrote a book called the Guide For The Preplexed and Kant wrote one called, The Critique Of Pure Reason. The both of these books should shade a greater light on your searched for God’s existence. A few more questions before Fenty go: where is the Human mind located and how does it store information and does it exist after death? Something to chew on people… Lexicon aka Mark Fenty….


  15. Fenty here again with a few more questions: We have already establisted that there isn’t any practical evidence that to conclusively justify that this higher being we called God do exist. On the other hand, some of the intellectual minds have also argued quite convencingly to the contrary. So where do we stand with this question which still continues to preplexed the learned world? Exactly, where we had stood when the question first troubled the thinkers of old. Let’s face it people, if the question regarding God’s existence was as simple as we first thought, we wouldn’t be having this conversation now. Now, I stand to be corrected with my analysis of the existence of God. But, in my simple mind, I’ve always argued that God operated on the same principle as that of the Human – Mind. Now we’re cognizant of the fact that the Human- Mind collects and stores information for future use much like a computer right? But where does it store this information though? We know that we cannot see this information with our physical eyes and we can’t touch it with our physical hands, but yet it is there for us the obtain whenever we need it. Some have called this process a state of consciousness,but I call it the principle by which our God operates. We cannot see God with our human eyes much like the Human – Mind but we know that He exist because He speaks to us through the Intuitive – Conscience. Lexicon aka Mark Fenty


  16. We ought and must have a discussion regarding God’s existence and our use of the scientific method to derived his existence. The scientific theorist wants to convince the secular world that our existence founded its birth through this process called the Big Bang Explosion. And it seems as though we would more readily accept this narrative but we are quick to question the religious worldview because we some of us believes that it is extraneous to our human understanding. Well, there are just something questions that a scientific method cannot answer such as: is there life after death, where do our consciousness goes after death, what is the nature of reality, and is there such a thing as Objective – Morality etc ? Lexicon aka Mark fenty..


  17. Sorry I’ve made several mistakes writing without the aid of spellcheck and with a phone… it is all memory that I using here….


  18. First of all, let me make it clear that i am not a disciple of Richard Dawkins or Darwin because. I have never been able to complete reading any of their rambling mythical publications. Mythical to some or not, as a book of substance the Bible it still remains according to empirical data the most widely read book in the world and has been around too long to be easily dismissed by those of us who by our pronouncements set ourselves up as fountains of all wisdom. Like any other publication, certain aspects of the Bible to the informed mind create doubt as evidenced by the portion highlighting the challenge from one in the inner circle of Jesus the disciple Thomas himself but other aspects are steeped in philosophical reasoning. The and logic and manifestations are as relevant to us now as was over 2000 years ago. As children, it is logical for the normal to do childish things; as we grow older it is expected for the normal to think in a more mature manner for there is a time and season for everything. Obviously this self-evident truth/logic would not apply to all but it does not negate the fact that unlike other philosophical publications designed to capture our imagination and impart knowledge, certain aspects of the Bible does offer solid guidelines which if followed could help us to be more tolerant towards our fellowman, to strive vigorously to be our brother’s keeper, to be unselfish, in short to love one another. So I do not waste precious time exercising myself in unexplainable matters like the existence of God, about the origin of our existence, about Adam and Eve , Cain and Abel, the Sabbath Day, the Virgin Birth and so on and so forth for ‘ In much wisdom saith the Preacher Ecclesiastes, “there is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which has is done is that which shall be done: that which hath been is now; and that which is to be hath already been”. The origin of God and the Devil is mysterious. Choose ye this day whom ye shall serve. The relativity of the concept ascribing Goodness to God or Evil to the Devil. Go and sin no more. Amen.


  19. Once the base of your dissertation is flawed all else will be going no where.,however well presented.


  20. Those of us, who have experienced the LOVE, MERCY, GRACE, protection, and provision of our Almighty Father God, and His Son, THE LORD JESUS CHRIST, KNOW* KNOW* without one shadow of DOUBT, that HE IS REAL, ALIVE, Omnipotently, Omnisciently, and Omnipresently SO!

    And besides the Eternal Godhead, of The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit, NOT three Gods, but ONE God, distinguishable, yet, indivisible, there IS NO OTHER GOD!


  21. Balance, I am having a little difficulty believing what you’re claiming about Richard Dawkins…. If as you have stated so conspicuously above that you weren’t using Mr. Dawkins as an authority to make your case. Then why would you an intelligent man I would assume, mentioned his name at all, given the international acclaimed this he has gotten from undermining the reality of God? By even slightly referring to this man’s name in a positive light, obviously tells the readership that you somehow values this man destructive ideas to some extent.


  22. Zoe, what you have stated so eloquently above are mere words that has little or no meaning to those persons who ascertain their truth through the empirical medium. I know what you’re saying happened to be true but it is me you want convinced. It is those person who can see no other mean to ascertion truth but through the sensory medium. In other words, their have to see it to believe it so to speak.


  23. The challenge for the Christian Church I believe is, to endeavor to explain the metaphysical of God, to a people who can only see truth through and objectified reality. An impossibility right? I thought so?


  24. That is way the ontological concept of Faith coming….


  25. @ balance
    Much respect is due to your 6:20 a.m. post.
    Very balanced…. 🙂

    Bushie keeps telling wunna that just because complex processes and phenomena are not understood (by you) does not in itself render these phenomena invalid…..
    Even the ‘simple’ things of this world elude most of us here on BU (like why some people are homosexual; like why human behavior is so unpredictable…… Shiite then… Like EVERYTHING!!! 🙂 )
    It is therefore quite funny to see people like ac (who has not even the basic knowledge that 1 and 1 does not always add to 2) making categorical and definitive statements about the existence of time, God and entropy….. LOL Ha Ha…
    …and like Vincent who thinks that anything that he does not grasp is speculative…..

    As balance quoted, “In much wisdom saith the Preacher Ecclesiastes, “there is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.”
    …..ac has to be a very happy woman………


  26. Chuckle……BT…..continue smartly.

  27. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Bush Tea | January 14, 2014 at 8:35 PM |
    “The very epistemological construct of “making” something should provide you the answer to your question.”

    Obviously “making” or “bringing into being” is a concept that is inextricably tied to the concept of TIME. Therefore, at some point of time T, something which did not exist before – comes into being and is said to be “made” or created.

    “GOD exists In a realm that is NOT subject to time (or space as we know it, or indeed to entropy)”

    Heavy, heavy stuff here, Bushie. Delving into the realm only men above the 33 1/3 knowledge parallel of esoterica dare to soar while trying to avoid the pitfalls of the “black” arts along the way. One of the Baal(s) or Melchizedek would be proud of your progression in your initiation classes of SUNDAY school.

    Here a dark secret for you to keep: Our God of the Universe is TIME. Your god of the Earth is the Star closest to you.

    TIME (Our God) has no Opposite force to control IT. Even your Yahweh has an Opposite the Devil (of Evil) and is woefully defective in his petty creation your side of the Galaxy with his fickle management style (choosing one set of his creatures over the others and then “ballistically” tries to eliminate them from the face of the earth.
    A medium-sized middle aged star god who finds it almost impossible to control his other ‘devilish’ dark side (mark you, his own created figment of his imagination after getting rid of the caduceus from the garden of good).

    At least we are getting some where in coming to a common “spiritual” understanding. TIME has done just that.
    We will only entertain you further if you are prepared to live as long as Rosencreutz.


  28. Miley Cyrus reveals her views on Jesus and causes waves!

    Miley Cyrus took an Instagram photo on Friday that expressed her views on Jesus; now this picture is causing a holy war with her fans on social media. The young pop star has been the center of tabloid obsessiveness for some time now. Her recent post about Jesus is certainly not slowing down her grasp for media attention in 2014.

    Her Jesus message invoked a lot of responses with some praising the singer for her views, and others standing against her message. ”Man You used to be My idol but you changed, And i hope you know what your saying,” one follower wrote. “miley, i love you so much for sharing this,” said another. Taking to Facebook someone commented, “do not talk about things you do not understand!” Another added, “all of the bible is God’s word.” Cyrus’ infamous VMA performance was one of the most talked about occurrences of 2013, and Barbara Walters’ named the 21-year-old one of the most fascinating people in the world. Her video for “Wrecking Ball,” which showed the singer with no clothes on, broke Vevo’s 24-hour record at 19.3 million views on YouTube, and continued to soar past 100 million views just a week after its release.

    These comments on Jesus come in contrast to a former “Anti-Christ” comment she made in 2012. She tweeted: “You are all stardust. You couldn’t be here if stars hadn’t exploded, because the elements (carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, all the things that matter for evolution) weren’t created at the beginning of time. They were created in stars. So forget Jesus. Stars died so you can live.” She later deleted the tweet that stirred up much strife among her fans.

    Cyrus regularly attended church as a young girl and even took to wearing a purity ring as a sign of her Christian faith. In 2008, Cyrus, an already very wealthy 15-year-old told Fox News in an interview that it is her faith that keeps her “grounded” and admitted her desire to follow Jesus. “Live like Christ and He’ll live in you, and that’s what I want to do,” she said. Just a few years after her father Billy Ray Cyrus, popular country music singer, said in an interview with GQ Magazine that he regretted having her in the “Hannah Montana Show” and also admitted to having made serious errors as parent. Billy Ray confessed that the entire family got baptized and were cautious of the temptations within the entertainment industry before to going to Los Angeles. ”Somewhere along this journey, both mine and Miley’s faith has been shaken,” he said. “That saddens me the most.” He acknowledged there is “no doubt” that his family is being ruined by Satan.

    SEE MILEY’S WORDS AT: http://endtimeheadlines.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/miley-cyrus-reveals-her-views-on-jesus-and-causes-waves/


  29. Pastor Calls NYC a “Plantation,” and The Mayor Thanks Him…

    SEE MORE: http://www.blackbluedog.com/2014/01/news/pastor-calls-nyc-a-plantation-and-the-mayor-thanks-him-2/


  30. Alvin…….ALL, including senators should be locked up, including the politicians who are now colluding/partnering with owners of insurance companies on the island to rob and destroy patients/victims of personal injury cases, monopolize the healthcare system on such a small island so they are the only beneficiaries, it’s so bad that some doctors are finding their hands tied because of the ongoing criminality being practiced etc. etc……we all know what they are doing, slithering into the pockets of the owners of these wealthy entities and burrowing in really deep to the detriment of the population on the island..none of them have clean hands they are ALL dirty..

    Alvin..have a great stay on the island, enjoy the beaches and sunshine.


  31. The Bushman said:
    “GOD exists In a realm that is NOT subject to time (or space as we know it, or indeed to entropy)”

    Now you know fully well that very few on BU maybe with the exception of Miller, David and maybe one or two more would ever understand that statement…even if you should them a slide on the subject.


  32. By the way….you would think said politicians would have learned from the mistakes of mixing politics with the likes of Parris, now they have replaced Parris with Harris…..disgusting.


  33. I am have full confidence in my Prime Minister who is doing the best job that he can to help steer the ship of state in the right direction. My Prime Minister speaks when he has something to say and not because he has to say something. My Prime Minister does not micro-manage so that he allows his Ministers to function and perform the roles that they are supposed to perform and for which they are being paid .

    I am satisfied that my Prime Minister, his Ministers and Parliamentary group are fully committed to making Barbados a better place to live notwithstanding the world economic situation. I share in the vision and mission of the Prime Minister , his Ministers and Parliamentary group. I am satisfied that Barbados can benefit from wise and prudent management and that the Prime Minister will become a great Prime Minister, one who kept the ship of state afloat during turbulent storms and unpredictable economic weather. Respect due to my Prime Minister.

    I am satisfied that my Minister of Finance is doing the best job that he can at this time and that he is doing everything possible to restructure the economy and to keep Barbados on a sound footing where the only place for Barbados to go is Up and On. He says that he is doing the things that need to be done to right size the economy , I believe him and give him my full support in this regard. Respect to my Minister of Finance

    All of the Ministers are doing the best they can as Barbadians for the good of Barbados and I give them my full support and I place full confidence in their abilities to succeed.

    I pledge my undivided support to the Government of Barbados.

    I give my full support to the elected and selected officials of Barbados who are the ones chosen to run the affairs of the country. They are Barbadians who are educated and competent, have the best wishes for Barbados, would like to see Barbados succeed and all of us as one big happy family enjoying the best that we can from our efforts.


  34. yes Miller GOD IS INDEED TIME AND SPACE. THE AIR WE BREATHE; THE SEA, THE SKY,THE EARTH, THE STARS AND ALL THAT THEREIN IS. NOTHING MYTHICAL OR HAIRYFAIRY ABOUT THAT VINCENT. JUST PURE FACT AND FINALLY GOD IS LOVE FOR THOSE WHO CAN EMBRACE THE THE CONCEPT.


  35. GOD IS LOVE
    I embrace that Concept


  36. What is the function/purpose of God,where did God come from and how many are in existence?

  37. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Vincent Haynes | January 15, 2014 at 12:59 PM |

    As many as man can conjure up. There have been many gods and many religions over millennia. The Internet would soon become a god.
    But there is one god that will always be with man; his money god in whichever form: metal, wood, paper or plastic or even electronic credit bits and bytes.

    Can you imagine mankind trading in the Alpha quadrant of your galaxy with the Ferengi? Sale of their females for gold-pressed bars of (p) latinum.


  38. @millertheanunnaki | January 15, 2014 at 1:11 PM |

    Chuckle…..my thoughts exactly…..

    I wonder if we could sell/exchange BT in the Alpha Quadrant…

  39. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Vincent Haynes | January 15, 2014 at 1:21 PM |

    You mean the Boss Talker called Bush Tea.
    Haven’t you heard that he has a job as the chief weed-wacker in his BBE’s garden?
    Is in that same Alpha Quadrant that His BBE has been cooling out for the last 25,800 years?


  40. ANON returns with a show-stopping come-back on January 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM: ”

    “@ jAcK bOwMaN … Man, your so-called level of ‘THINKING’ sucks!”

    Well … no, Terry. See, what you mean is: “Man, your level of so-called THINKING sucks!”

    That’s to say, you’re not questioning the level of the thinking, Terry. And in any case, “the so-called level” doesn’t actually mean anything. What you’re questioning is the thinking itself, and you’re trying to characterize it as non-thinking. So “Man, your level of so-called THINKING sucks!” is a more accurate written expression of the insulting thought that originally formed in your brain.

    The thought just lost its way a bit as it went meandering along the various misfiring synapses between your temporal lobe and your fingers on the keyboard.

    You could have saved yourself some trouble simply by saying: “Man, your so-called THINKING sucks!” The needless business about the “level” just confused you a tad. It did that because, characteristically, you were trying to cram too many unnecessary words into the sentence.

    But thanks for proving my point, the one that you were objecting to.


  41. So Miller, when you look upon a well designed and built structure such as The Louvre, it is clear that the whole impressive structure sits on a well conceived and very specific foundation which was specifically designed to accommodate that structure and to cater to its specifications……right?
    ….or do you conclude that the foundation is the creator of the structure?

    While it would be difficult for a simple minded person such as ac to conceive, after a visit to that impressive monument, that there was a time when that area was nothing but forest…..surely an Annunaki HAS TO KNOW that some engineer must have conceived, designed and built that foundation – with a full vision and knowledge of the structure to be later constructed on it….

    “Time” is all-pervasive because it is the FOUNDATION upon which our experience of reality rests. Everything that belongs to our reality – our lives, our assets, our folly, our consciousness, our knowledge our pain – is time-bound.

    Indeed, the ONLY aspect of our existence that transcends time is …..(you guessed it) our Character….

    Time is BIG, and it is all encompassing…..but is is just another of the critical building blocks needed to create the melting pot that was specifically designed and built to produce that most elusive and valuable of possible products…..RIGHTEOUS CHARACTER.

    WHAT TIME IS WHAT GOD WHAT?!?!

    Time is but the foundation of the overall project by those BIG BOSS ENGINEERS who are responsible for the masterful design called “Life on earth” ….the final output of which will be human personalities imbued with RIGHTEOUS CHARACTER…..

    What brilliance!
    What good news (Gospel) for mankind
    What glorious potentialities….for those with eyes to see and ears to hear,,


  42. @ Vincent
    What is the function/purpose of God,where did God come from and how many are in existence?

    That question is right up there ….and about as relevant as those asked by one of Lowdown’s goats of a fellow goat (called ‘ac’)…

    -Who the ramsgate that man Hoad think he is?
    -Where he come from?
    -and what is his purpose?

    …..playing he teking we milk every damn day – and killing ram goats as he please……for meat….
    Wuh he is God?


  43. BT what is there to know….the evidence of god existing in TIME is in the BIBLE over and over again from huis seven day creatiion. and includind his resurrection… wether it is mathematically calulated as we know it or as GOD wants it …..Time is TIME and that can,t change and gods use of TIME is percise


  44. @ Vincent
    I wonder if we could sell/exchange BT in the Alpha Quadrant…

    LOL
    Not a shiite uh dat…….!

    Your old ancestors sold the multi colored coat-man Joseph; and later you great great grand father “Judas” sold another bushman for 30 pieces of silver…..but…

    Bush Tea ain’t going for ANYTHING less that $10 big ones (Mills 🙂 )


  45. Wait!!!!
    You does work ac…?


  46. Bushie’s back with some major philosophical insights on January 15, 2014 at 2:28 PM. Let’s see if our feeble and benighted minds, mewling in the dark godless pit of their doomed ignorance, can try to grasp them:

    “So Miller, when you look upon a well designed and built structure such as The Louvre, it is clear that the whole impressive structure sits on a well conceived and very specific foundation which was specifically designed to accommodate that structure and to cater to its specifications……right?”

    Yes, right.

    “….or do you conclude that the foundation is the creator of the structure?”

    No. Do not conclude that. Still following you.

    “While it would be difficult for a simple minded person such as ac [needless insult] to conceive, after a visit to that impressive monument, that there was a time when that area was nothing but forest … surely an Annunaki HAS TO KNOW that some engineer must have conceived, designed and built that foundation – with a full vision and knowledge of the structure to be later constructed on it.”

    Yes. Agreed. Still following you here.

    “Time” is all-pervasive because it is the FOUNDATION upon which our experience of reality rests. Everything that belongs to our reality – our lives, our assets, our folly, our consciousness, our knowledge our pain – is time-bound.”

    We think we might be losing the thread here, but we’ll persevere.

    “Indeed, the ONLY aspect of our existence that transcends time is …..(you guessed it) our Character….”

    Er … no, or at least highly arguable. My love for my parents, an important “aspect of [my] existence”, clearly transcends time irrespective of my randomly-capitalized Character. They died a long time ago, but my love for them is in no way time-bound. You might have to re-think that one.

    “Time is BIG”

    We’re thinking of putting that on a T-shirt in huge letters. It’s so profound. We’ll trademark it and give you 15 percent of the gross sales.

    “but [time] is is just another of the critical building blocks needed to create the melting pot”

    Mixed metaphors are never an aid to understanding among your readers. Or indeed among one’s patients. It forces them, subliminally, to make a rapid mental scan that is inimical to mood and comprehension.

    “…that was specifically designed and built to produce that most elusive and valuable of possible products…..RIGHTEOUS CHARACTER.”

    Says who? You?

    “WHAT TIME IS WHAT GOD WHAT?!?!”

    We read it four times and we still don’t grasp the intended meaning. The upper case didn’t help, and the exclamations just made it worse.

    “Time is but the foundation of the overall project by those BIG BOSS ENGINEERS who are responsible for the masterful design called “Life on earth” ….the final output of which will be human personalities imbued with RIGHTEOUS CHARACTER…..”

    Not only is this an evidence-free assertion, it also makes a reader wonder if you’ve got Ridley Scott’s “Prometheus” on video permaloop at home (LOVED Fassbender as the creepy android).

    “What brilliance!”

    Well … er … not quite.


  47. Whether God exist in a shoe box or in the garden of Eden or inside or outside the hearts iof man. .Time will be the same forever cannot change or dupiclated by no man not even GOD.


  48. BT if u want to argue thatgod and TIME are equal maybe i will cut u some slack and a little head nod. but this bull crap that god exixt outside of time in some make beluice hemispohere bullloney only and old sage who barely exist can conjure up


  49. @ac

    And how do you know anyway?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading