The New Nationalism: What’s In A Name? The White Nationalist and The Strange Re-Birth of Humpty Dumpty

Submitted by Caleb M. Pilgrim

The term “white nationalist” has recently come into greater prominence, and used to refer to individuals such as Steve Bannon, Richard Spencer, the Alt-Right, the Breitbart people and others elsewhere, e.g Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage, UKIP et al in the U.K. These particular whites largely appear disaffected, disappointed, disillusioned, if not at times delusional.  But, the term “white nationalist” is a specious, counterfeit concept.  It represents nothing more than another claim to “aryan” supremacy, by another name.  It does not elevate.  Its function is simply to legitimize or excuse white extremism (e.g the bigotry of the “good old boys” who lynched thousands yesteryear with impunity). 

Time was when words used to have consequences.  It may seem less so now, even a bit blurred, in an age of “fake news”, “alternative facts”, and so-called “political correctness”.  Some may even say that they no longer know what to believe. But, words, because of their effects, still matter. 

In their studies on nationalism, writers such as Kedourie, Minogue, Gellner and Hinsley in the U.K. , and a ton of others in the U.S.A, going back as far as Professor Carlton Hayes and others, all considered the kernels of nationalism as involving (1) a common language; (2) a common culture, shared traditions and a common stock of historical memories; (3) a distinct national territory, even if disputed (e.g the Kurds and many others).

Historically, if we consider the differences between American, English, Scottish, Irish, Welsh, French, German, Italian, Polish, Russian, Slav, and other sometimes warring nationalisms, although pigmentation may be white, such nations and their nationalisms are clearly not one and the same.  What, for instance, does a murderous, genocidal Nazi/German nationalism have in common with Russian, Polish, or Yugo(Slavs) nationalisms or nationalism of the untermenschen, or with the nationalism(s) of European  Jewry sometimes resistant, say in a Warsaw ghetto under siege?  How can Serbian, Bosnian, Croatian and Albanian nationalism be the same?  Would English and Afrikaner nationalism in South Africa be the same?  Ditto Turkish, Kurdish and Armenian nationalisms?  Need I go on?

Today’s “white nationalist” and white nationalism thus represent nothing more than an amorphous blob, a rag bag which either wrongfully lumps together many different types of whites or simply co-opts any type of white, regardless. The idea goes back even before racists such as Senator John C. Calhoun, Chief Justice Taney, and the millions  who believed that a black person had no rights that a white person was bound to respect. 

The idea of the “white nationalist” confuses concepts of race, nation(ality) and nationalism.  Its pedigree betrays it as an ugly, hopelessly confused mongrel. It is like mistaking a skinhead for an ordinary bald-headed man, ignoring the implications.  In terms of today’s civil society and our ever declining civil discourse, the so-called “white nationalist” is the result of a marriage of inconvenience, a savage, untamed, marauder dressed up in respectable clothing. 

One other point, it appears that if the matter involves a murderous white sicko, a Dillon Routh, a James Harris Jackson, or a Jeremy Christian, rampaging and killing or attempting to kill innocent blacks or some other minorities, then the accused is labeled a “white supremacist”.  On the other hand, a Steve Bannon, a Richard Spencer, Alt -Right and Breitbart, espousing similar if not the same ideology, are euphemistically referred to as “white nationalists”.  In either case, they are rooted in race, rather than nationality or nationalism.

We are thus reminded of Humpty when he first saw Alice and asked her “but tell me your name and your business”. She replied “my name is Alice, but —-“.   Humpty interrupted her impatiently saying, “It’s a stupid name enough.  What does it mean”?  Alice, doubtful, in response, then asked Humpty “Must a name mean something”?  Humpty:  “Of course, it must, with a short laugh.  “my name means the shape I am    — and a good handsome shape it is, too.  With a name like yours, you might be any shape, almost”.

For those of us who still believe that words have meanings, and that we should say what we mean and mean what we say, we should resist this illegitimate use of this term “white nationalism”, as it betrays the concept of nationalism, liberal or conservative, properly understood. Historians, political scientists, academics in general, and indeed any History or Pol Sci major, ought to have long aided in correcting and exploding this egregious abuse of language, this strange new Humpty Dumpty notion, and the growing if not pervasive misconception, the bastardization of traditional nationalism, and this novel, additional bit of a-historical, un-analytical muck.

The notion of the “white nationalist” may hold a magical attraction for some.   However, its sinister intent should concern us all, including the millions of black immigrants in the US, UK and elsewhere.

Advertisements

Tags: ,

8 Comments on “The New Nationalism: What’s In A Name? The White Nationalist and The Strange Re-Birth of Humpty Dumpty”

  1. Dompey July 2, 2017 at 6:20 PM #

    It must not be forgotten that the German philosopher Immanuel Kant also pushed his racist philosophy regarding the people of the warmer climates in an attempted to undermine the collective intellect of the black race.

    Like

  2. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger July 2, 2017 at 6:28 PM #

    White nationalism means racism and nothing else.

    Like

  3. Dompey July 2, 2017 at 6:48 PM #

    Well Well

    Thank God you live in country where you don’t have to sleep, work, eat and live next to the enemy, and then have to pretend that you live in a Melting Pot were differences doesn’t separate you.

    Like

  4. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger July 2, 2017 at 7:58 PM #

    Dompey…how do you know where I lived and how I never did that, the difference is, I acted just like them….to them…..and they not only understood it, but respected it,

    Like

  5. Vincent Haynes July 4, 2017 at 1:28 PM #

    Hmm….interesting article….brings to mind xenophobia,a fear of the unknown,this is what drives nationalism not superiority by virtue of whatever amount of melanin shown in that particular tribe.

    Hitler was part Jew and looked the furtherest thing from his Aryan posters….Boris is part Turkoman…..this european tribal 700 hundred year old affliction of addressing by skin tone as opposed to the millenia old way of identifying one by ones tribe has caused severe damage to the psyche of many humans especially the the progeny of the transatlantic slave trade from both tribal origins Europe and West Africa who do not know what they are fish,fowl or good red herring…..especially the ones in North America.

    Like

  6. Lee July 5, 2017 at 9:01 AM #

    And so it is evident – an Asian will rule the world

    Like

  7. Lee July 5, 2017 at 9:04 AM #

    For a while – again !!

    Like

  8. 555dubstreet July 6, 2017 at 4:53 PM #

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: