The Jeff Cumberbatch Column – Of Overweight Jockeys and the Road not Taken

Jeff Cumberbatch – Chairman of the FTC and Deputy Dean, Law Faculty, UWI, Cave Hill

I shall be telling this with a sigh

Somewhere ages and ages hence:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference”

-The Road not Taken –Robert Frost

To my best recollection, each of our Prime Ministers has been blessed with a sharp turn of linguistic wit, ever ready to paint a scenario, no matter how grave, with a memorable turn of phrase.

I vividly recall that on the second day of the debate on the Constitutional amendments of 1974, the Prime Minister, the Right Honourable Errol Barrow, (as he then was), plaintively inquiring “Where have all the flowers gone?” a sarcastic dylanesque reference to the glaring absence of the tumultuous crowd that had swarmed the yard of Parliament in protest the day before. Perhaps Mr Tom Adams’ tenure was far too brief for him to bequeath me a memorable phrase, but I feel sure that there must be more than one. And Sir Harold Bernard St John, as he was to become, would have suffered similarly.

However, Prime Minister Sandiford will be remembered for his description of the irremovable force of some meeting the irresistible object of his will. “He was adamant, I was adamant, something had to give” [paraphrased] and his later caricature in calypso intoning “you could like it or you could lump it…none o’ you ain’t brekking up my night rest”. His successor, Mr Owen Arthur continued the tradition with his colourful vernacular description of one Parliament as “po’ rakey”, while I can recall the late Mr David Thompson comparing the local economy to a fatted calf.

The current Prime Minister, Mr Freundel Stuart seems bent on continuing the tradition, if it may be so described. With a clear affection for the classics and for language in general, Mr Stuart has delivered himself of some linguistic gems, although his detractors have sought to use these as further telling evidence of his distance from the electorate. There are some Barbadians who are prepared to accuse writers or speakers of the local heresy of “showing off” whenever they use an unfamiliar word; as if one’s vocabulary should remain at the level of a second form pupil for the balance of one’s existence. Doubtless, some have suffered thusly.

I was struck by Prime Minister Stuart’s use of the collective “carnival” to describe a number of clowns in reference to a group on a previous occasion; and by his metaphor of “sucking on the already painfully sore nipples of the nation” by those who were still demanding economic concessions from the state in the midst of stringency; and last week he switched the figure of speech to approximate the national economy to a horse and the traditional civic entitlements to a jockey. In his words, “The state has found itself in a position where, with spiraling expenditure in those years (the period of satisfied entitlement) and with dwindling revenue, the jockey, it seems has become too heavy for the horse and whenever the jockey becomes too heavy for the horse, the horse cannot compete effectively…”

He is right. Indeed, the very point was made earlier in the same debate by Mr Arthur, who now sits as an Independent MP, when he suggested a reform of the hoary paternalistic approach to assisting citizens that previous administrations had employed over the years.

Of course, even highlighting this new normal comes at an electoral cost, but the manifesto promises of those parties aspiring to office should be tempered nevertheless by this reality. Tradition dies hard, however, and there will of course be the alluring campaign promises of a return to the old ways, although it should be clear even to the proverbial “blind man on the trotting horse in the middle of the street” that those days of near plenty have swiftly receded and are gone forever. Heraclitus’ dictum that you cannot step into the same river twice applies with full force in this context.

So far as my assessment of the budgetary proposals themselves and the subsequent debate is concerned, I was out last week and was therefore limited to reading a transcript of the Finance Minister’s speech and listening online to the reply of the Leader of the Opposition. I have read newspaper extracts only of the other members’ contributions since my return.

My general impression is that we are in a grave circumstance (no pun!). Former Prime Minister Arthur argued cogently that having come to a fork in the economic road, we chose the one less travelled -that of the home grown solution- one that leads inexorably to the imposition of harsh measures, rather than the one more used by the scrunting traveller –that of approaching the International Monetary Fund [IMF] for technical assistance. In his view, it was a judgment call and the current governing administration chose the path that may lead to unwarranted human suffering.

This recourse of approaching the IMF for assistance is one that has been touted time and again in recent months by some prominent economists –among them Mr Arthur himself; Professor Howard; Ms Dukharan; and Dr Worrell- as the optimal solution to our prevailing economic woes.

However, the current administration is adamant that this is not the way, preferring that the citizenry take the bitter medicine of the homegrown recovery. This seeming antipathy to recourse to the IMF is understandable. One of the local sacred cows is the exchange rate of our currency to the US dollar and there might be an innate apprehension on the part of the government that such an avenue is fraught with both the likelihood of devaluation and consequent indelible electoral disfavour. I do not know.

There are equally those who might argue, however, that the recently imposed levy on foreign exchange transactions does serve to reduce the value of the local dollar, resulting in a de facto, though not de jure, devaluation. When, concomitantly, there is an increase in the cost of imports owing to the increase in the rate National Social Responsibility Levy [NSRL], the die is cast.

An enjoyable Whit Monday!

Advertisements

Tags:

118 Comments on “The Jeff Cumberbatch Column – Of Overweight Jockeys and the Road not Taken”

  1. Jeff Cumberbatch June 5, 2017 at 9:12 AM #

    …if commenters are saying that all lawyer/politicians, or the majority, are bringing parliament in to disrepute then they have the power to vote them out

    @ Hal, this argument, that differs substantially from your earlier recommendation, is irrefutable, but its premise is fallacious.

    I have not seen any argument on BU that Dale Marshall, Ronald Toppin, Ms Bradshaw, Stephen Lashley,George Payne, Adriel Brathwaite and Mia Mottley, to name a few, are bringing Parliament into disrepute. Who, then, constitute this so-called majority?

    Like

  2. Gabriel June 5, 2017 at 10:15 AM #

    The PM was written by the Banker’s Association in respect of a matter over which they have serious misgivings.The PM failed to reply in a timely manner and used the TV to inform all who listened that since a copy of their letter to him found its way into the possession of the Leader of the Opposition,he is afraid a copy of his reply will have a similar fate.One is left to assume that that is as good a reason as any for not having the decency to reply to the Bankers’ Association.And we speak of Productivity in the public service when the titular head can so glibly fail to act in the interest of good governance policy.

    Like

  3. Hal Austin June 5, 2017 at 10:17 AM #

    @ David,
    Under our electoral system, voters vote for individuals, not parties, that is why when someone resigns from a party they can join the Opposition without having to fact the electorate. We have discussed this before.
    @Jeff,
    My original argument has not changed, I have simply qualified it by stating once again the quality of Santia Bradshaw (I do not know her and was introduced to her once in St Lawrence Gap, an encounter of a few seconds). My curiosity about her is that she did not go to Cave Hill, but to a south of England university best known for its marine studies.
    I suspect the lack of sound professional ethics has something to do with their training at UWI. Just look at the number who do pro bono work. It was Caribbean lawyers who led the creation of free law centres in Britain, led by the late Guyana-born Rudi Narayan, a man who a former Labour solicitor general once told me should have been a judge.
    On the other hand, I do not know of the personal or professional lives of the names you have mentioned, apart from the fact that some feature in BU occasionally in bringing the House in to disrepute and others that have been talked about negatively in private in my presence.
    However, more substantively, ours is a political culture dominated by lawyers and, I would contest, they are implicit in not challenging the major fault lines that run through our policy-making, from the drafting of legislation to the disciplinary approach to wrongdoing.
    If lawyer/politicians do not add value to law-making then there is no real value in having lawyers as our members of parliament.
    And for those who always want to throw stones, we have the same problem in the UK. The only difference is that others also rise to the top: our prime minister is a geography graduate and former Bank of England employee, and our Leader of the Opposition is a non-graduate, having dropped out of the Polytechnic of North London.
    A bigger problem for us is the dominance of Oxford University, and especially PPE graduates.
    While we are at t, why can’t layers be allowed to compete: advertise, charge competitive fees, be compelled to attend continuing professional development courses, and, most of all, have a disciplinary system in which non-lawyers form the majority on the committee.
    The counter-argument that they need people who understand law is untenable; the disciplinary committee will have its own counsel who will advise them on the law.

    Like

  4. David June 5, 2017 at 10:19 AM #

    @Hal

    You are challenged oftentimes by the theory of the matter. Many vote party at election time it matters not the name on the ticket.

    Like

  5. Bush Tea June 5, 2017 at 10:19 AM #

    @ Jeff
    “I have not seen any argument on BU that…..”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Who would expect for there to be an outcry over ordinary dirt ….when truckloads of shiite are being unloaded in parliament on a regular basis?

    In the land of the really evil, the ordinary ‘crook’ is a saint….

    That said, …none of us are perfect, but most of us do NOT have the legal authority and the financial opportunity, to do the kinda shiite that lawyers get to do routinely….

    Like

  6. Hal Austin June 5, 2017 at 10:34 AM #

    David,
    People may vote B or D, but our system of government is that electors vote for individuals. This is not a Bajan thing, but the law. A government is formed by the person who could command a majority in parliament.
    No matter how many times you repeat this does not change the fact that you are wrong. That is why if a majority of a third party and independents were elected and could agree on a basic programme, then they could form the next government.
    On the other hand, if we had a system of recall, a member of parliament kicked out of his/her party (Dr Agard) there will have to be a bye-lection.
    It is basic Westminster politics.

    Like

  7. Jeff Cumberbatch June 5, 2017 at 10:41 AM #

    I have simply qualified it by stating once again the quality of Santia Bradshaw (I do not know her and was introduced to her once in St Lawrence Gap, an encounter of a few seconds). My curiosity about her is that she did not go to Cave Hill, but to a south of England university best known for its marine studies.

    @Hal, Really? is this how you assess quality? Incidentally, this was your original argument-

    When the general election comes, vote out all lawyer/politicians, no matter how decent and honest. Purge the swamp.

    Quid multa?

    Like

  8. Hal Austin June 5, 2017 at 11:16 AM #

    Jeff,

    You are making a mountain out of a mole hill. My submission was in reply to the previous submission: in other words, if one is fed up with the unethical behaviour of lawyers and their propensity towards forming a professional mafia, then vote them out of office. T|hat was the context.
    In response to you, I reiterated what I have said previously, from observation, Santia Bradshaw behaves with a calm and dignity that is not typical of Barbadian lawyer or politicians. I have been a client of local lawyers. That observation stands.
    I suspect what you really want to ask is if I think so highly of Ms Bradshaw, am I suggesting that she too should be voted out. Yes. If we are purging the swamp, then we must purge the swamp.
    Lawyers do not bring anything exceptional to the parliamentary table. Look at the US Senate, the US Congress, the UK parliament.

    Like

  9. A. Dullard June 5, 2017 at 11:37 AM #

    @ Mr Dullard, I accede to your superior knowledge in matters faecal and I awfully regret your failed attempt(s) to gain entry into the Faculty of Law. You should also attempt to divine the origins of those “few exceptions”

    There you go again.

    I know how dear UWI is to local arrivistes such as yourself but for some Cave Hill (Law Faculty or otherwise) would be a massive step down.
    Given your position as a key stakeholder in the legal system in B’dos by virtue of your long tenure as a teacher of many of Barbados’ lawyers what have you done to address the poor state of the legal “profession” in Barbados?

    PS: Arcane citations and verbal chicanery do not count.

    Yours
    A. Dullard

    Like

  10. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 11:55 AM #

    @THE JEFF CUMBERBATCH COLUMN – OF OVERWEIGHT JOCKEYS AND THE ROAD NOT TAKEN.”

    I don’t understand why wunna keep saying that the jockey is overweight.

    There is NOTHING wrong with the jockey.

    It is the horse that has been kept on a starvation diet.

    Feed the horse for God’s sake.

    Like

  11. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 12:01 PM #

    @Jeff Cumberbatch “sucking on the already painfully sore nipples of the nation”

    Dear Jeff: My late beloved mother was even more colourful that any Prime Minister of Barbados.

    One of my favourites of hers was “at sometime you have to TAKE the bubbbies out of the baby’s mouth”

    It is way past time that we take our bubbies out of the Prime Minister’s mouth, and out of the mouth’s of the DLP.

    We tired ‘o sucklin’ DEM..

    Like

  12. David June 5, 2017 at 12:03 PM #

    Interesting exchange today between David Ellis and Donville Inniss. Have a listen and be the judge if Inniss would have voted yea or nea if the Opposition had called for a divide. Why did the opposition not call for a divide anyway.

    https://www.barbadosparliament.com/video/view/515

    Like

  13. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 12:10 PM #

    @Alvin Cummins June 4, 2017 at 1:34 PM “The decision to replace the car is not made by the office holder.”

    Almost certainly the decision is made with the CONSENT of the office holder.

    You really ‘ink that we went to school at de pipe?

    Like

  14. Jeff Cumberbatch June 5, 2017 at 12:14 PM #

    *It is way past time that we take our bubbies out of the Prime Minister’s mouth, and out of the mouth’s of the DLP.

    We tired ‘o sucklin’ DEM..*

    @ Simple Simon, I am not clear from this who owns the nipples and who is doing the sucking!

    Like

  15. Bush Tea June 5, 2017 at 12:15 PM #

    @ Simple Simon
    You really ‘ink that we went to school at de pipe?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    You really ‘ink that Alvin does think….?

    Like

  16. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger June 5, 2017 at 12:17 PM #

    That’s all Alvin is good for, sitting his yardfowl tail up on Eglinton insulting people’s intelligence and condoning wicked crimes , theft, fraud and disenfranchisement against his own people.

    Like

  17. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 12:19 PM #

    @Bush Tea June 5, 2017 at 8:54 AM “Why are YOU not SETTING the moral and ethical standards for these Cretins?”

    You understand right? that it is really, really hard to teach a cretin anything.

    Like

  18. Jeff Cumberbatch June 5, 2017 at 12:21 PM #

    Why did the opposition not call for a divide anyway.(?)

    @ David, perhaps it was clear to the Opposition that it could not win given traditional voting patterns. Of course, one other significant purpose of the call for a divide is for Government M Ps to “show their hand” publicly. The Opposition might have missed a step here!

    Like

  19. Jeff Cumberbatch June 5, 2017 at 12:25 PM #

    Sincere apologies, SS, I misread your “suckling” for” sucking”! A fundamental error!

    Like

  20. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 12:35 PM #

    @Jeff Cumberbatch June 5, 2017 at 12:14 PM “@ Simple Simon, I am not clear from this who owns the nipples and who is doing the sucking!”

    Dear Jeff:

    Let me therefore clarify.

    The taxpayers own the nipples.

    The politicians, principally at this time the highly paid DLP Cabinet members, and their friends are doing the sucking/getting the free milk.

    We the taxpayers who produce ALL OF THE MILK are tired of breast feeding the political class.

    Between my mother and me and my sisters and daughters we have breast fed dozens of literal infants. Infants rarely willingly give up the freeness, the sweetness, and the ease of the breast feeding.

    The mother/taxpayer has to initiate the removal of the breast from the mouth of the infant who so enjoys the freeness, the sweetness and the ease of breast feeding.

    Since neither you or the Prime Minister have never ever breast fed an infant it is unlikely that either of you truly understand the mother/infant dynamic.

    At this time we are tired of feeding DLP politicians and their friends.

    We want their mouths offa we nipples.

    I trust that this is crystal clear.

    If it is not, please attend detention tomorrow after school.

    Like

  21. David June 5, 2017 at 12:36 PM #

    @Jeff

    Of course, one other significant purpose of the call for a divide is for Government M Ps to “show their hand” publicly. The Opposition might have missed a step here!

    This is the point!

    One can also question David Ellis why he did not take the opportunity to exact a definitive position from Innis in his text exchange.

    Like

  22. angela Skeete June 5, 2017 at 12:42 PM #

    Well !Well !the biggest yardfowl on BU is YOU nobody spends more time on Bu paling spouting more sh.it than you.fuh u to call anybody a yardfowl is laughable.. Check yuh self first bozie and see how many feathers uh left hanging on the paling yardfowl.

    Like

  23. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 12:42 PM #

    @Jeff Cumberbatch June 5, 2017 at 12:25 PM “Sincere apologies, SS, I misread your “suckling” for” sucking”! A fundamental error!”

    Indeed.

    If you were in my class you would have earned a big fat zero for this fundamental error.

    Like

  24. David June 5, 2017 at 12:45 PM #

    Here is Delisle Worrell’s latest publication.

    http://delisleworrell.com/Economic%20Adjustment%20in%20Barbados%3A%20Examples%20from%20Successful%20Countries

    Like

  25. Vincent Haynes June 5, 2017 at 12:52 PM #

    Alvin

    It is also important to note that these adjustment programmes were all supported by IMF financing
    agreements, giving the lie to the myth that the IMF is committed to currency devaluation in every
    situation, and that IMF assistance always comes at a cost in terms of social wellbeing.

    The lesson for Barbados is clear, and it confirms what we already know, based on our own experience in
    1991. The treatment for what ails our economy is a reduction in the costs of operation of government and state enterprises, supported by financial assistance from the IMF and other international and regional financial institutions. That may hurt the economy somewhat in the near term, but it will reset the external balance, restore confidence, reverse the sentiment at credit rating agencies, and uncover the strong underlying competitiveness of our tourism, international business, rum and other selected
    manufactures, and renewable energy service providers.
    …………………………………………………………………………………………

    Delisle Worrell’s latest publication.
    Your former buddy…..any comments??

    Like

  26. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM #

    The fundamental error is that the Prime Minister sees the political class/the government as the milk creators, when in fact they are the milk takers.

    Like

  27. Ping Pong June 5, 2017 at 2:07 PM #

    I wonder if Dr Worrell gave the same advice to the Government of Barbados as that given in his latest publication? Dr Worrell uses Cyrus, Latvia, Iceland and Ireland as exemplars for Barbados. All of these countries are either part of the EU or in association with the EU. Does this fact have any bearing on their economic recovery?

    Like

  28. Hal Austin June 5, 2017 at 2:10 PM #

    Ping Pong,
    Economic competence, that is the real difference.

    Like

  29. David June 5, 2017 at 2:23 PM #

    BU is willing to be corrected but aren’t the four countries cited by Worrell have significant exports? In other words the economies are different.

    >

    Like

  30. Bush Tea June 5, 2017 at 2:30 PM #

    Dr Worrell should carry his old donkey long home and play with his cars… or something…
    He had no use for the press when he was in his glory….
    He should be treated likewise now that he has been dumped by the DLP goons…

    Only talking shiite now that it suits him….

    F$#^K !!

    Like

  31. Simple Simon June 5, 2017 at 6:09 PM #

    @Bush Tea June 5, 2017 at 2:30 PM ” should carry his old donkey long home and play with his cars…or something…Only talking shiite now that it suits him”

    Lol

    Like

  32. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger June 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM #

    Ass’ s…….being exposed hurts real, real, real bad dont it….GOOD….lol, hahaha, ,lol.

    Like

  33. Ping Pong June 5, 2017 at 7:25 PM #

    I think the case of Iceland may be instructive for Barbados. Iceland’s economy is based mainly on tourism and other services. It’s in the middle of the North Atlantic and Iceland’s population is just over 332 000. However Iceland’s GDP is 4 -5 times that of Barbados. Iceland has also recovered from a far more deleterious economic crisis which started in 2007 than what has occurred in Barbados. It is clear that Iceland managed its economic situation with much greater resolve and sense of purpose than we have. Interestingly the Prime Minister that led the restoration of Iceland’s economy was an openly gay female. (Hmm…). However while it is irrefutable that competent management of the economy was implemented in Iceland, I also strongly believe that Iceland membership of European Economic Area which allows access to the EU single market has given Iceland options that Barbados does not have. Nevertheless while Singapore has often been extolled as a model for Barbados I think we should examine Iceland instead.

    As I fantasize about the way forward for Barbados, I would advise the next administration to not only pursue an Icelandic style economic management model but also deepening of regional cooperation say by joining the OECS, adopting the EC dollar and strengthening our relationship with Guyana and Suriname such that free movement of people and capital between Barbados and those two countries is effected and the pursuit of free trade with Brazil, Central America, Colombia, Peru and Ecuador.

    Like

  34. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger June 5, 2017 at 9:18 PM #

    Icelandic politicians/governments are blessed with critical thinking skills and the population has the power to fire any government immediately at the whiff of corruption or crimes against the people and country,  they have a real democracy, the people know they employ the government and act like it…..they know they have the power to change a government every year until they get the right fit.

    Like

  35. William Skinner June 5, 2017 at 11:09 PM #

    What i find fascinating as I peruse these contributions is the use of now popular American cliches: drain the swamp, right wing conservative, etc. Yesterday I saw in the Nation an article about “Barbadian exceptionalism”.
    Like we gone from Britain to America now
    I going and look for a bagel….Bridgetown is now New York. We will soon hear about inner cities.

    Like

  36. William Skinner June 5, 2017 at 11:49 PM #

    Having just read Worrell’s article, it is obvious that he and Arthur are now in full agreement. It should be a lesson for those who were “cussing” Worrell before because once more his intellectual honesty is present.
    For the record, I disagree with both Arthur and Worrell. Although, I found Arthur’s Budget contribution to be the only one of substance and I understand his thinking, it is quite depressing that after fifty years of independence, we still find ourselves incapable of solving our own socio-economic problems.
    It is clear that our intellectuals are lacking creativity and the few who tried to progressively change our circumstances in the period shortly pre and post independence have not been replaced.
    Where there is no vision, the people perish. Unless new visionaries arise from throughout the region, we will continue with what is really plantation economies always going cap in hand to our former masters, now disguised as IMF , and other agencies of modern economic colonialism and destruction.

    Like

  37. angela Skeete June 6, 2017 at 5:31 AM #

    It saddens me that this great economist OSA having placing barbados between a rock and a hard place with unsustainable debt has not one intellectual idea comprised of his own thinking that would put barbados on an economic path of recovery except to rolled out an economic carpet that many other countries have strolled down and now finds themselves in the clutches of unbearable hardship for their people .

    Like

  38. Bush Tea June 6, 2017 at 6:53 AM #

    @ William
    Even if what he says now makes sense (a BIG if), your man Worrell is akin to a house nigger who fell out of favour with the master, and got his donkey kicked out of the ‘big house’ from which he previously pissed down on the field slaves.
    Now, in an attempt to spite the former masters, he is on a campaign to expose their secrets – which he previously championed, while dissing the Press and public.
    Bushie do NOT play that shiite game.

    Don’t want to hear him….
    Don’t want to see him…
    Not joining with him…

    Tell him to ‘haul his donkey’ and go away…
    He is playing that he is a ‘Saul of Tarsus’…
    But is was not God that struck him blind and gave him a vision…
    …it was Stinkliar who fired his tail …and who started his nightmare.

    So tell him that he is no Paul … He is more of a Judas.

    Like

  39. Tony Trotman June 6, 2017 at 7:17 AM #

    With reference to the fourth paragraph of Mr Cumberbatch’s article – I think that a speaker should tailor their words to suit their audience, e.g. a MP who is speaking to a diverse audience of Barbadians who are likely to have varying vocabularies. The objective of the speaker must be effective communication.

    Like

  40. William Skinner June 6, 2017 at 8:04 AM #

    @ Bush Tea
    What concerns me more is the failure to find workable solutions to our socio-economic problems. I am fundamentally opposed to the positions now held by both Arthur and Worrell.
    @ Tony Trotman
    We still have a school of thought that subscribes to the notion that big words mean big ideas. Language is constantly evolving and it is basically illogical to send people scurrying to the dictionary when that can be avoided. Most people do not accept that a truly educated person displays humility rather than seek to “show off”.
    However, in all fairness to Jeff , he does construct his offerings in such a way that they do not present any tremendous difficulty for his readers. I have been reading him long before he appeared in BU and he is perhaps one of our most effective communicators.

    Like

  41. Vincent Haynes June 6, 2017 at 8:41 AM #

    Ping Pong June 5, 2017 at 7:25 PM #

    Well stated and on point,especially the need to form a federation of Caribbean states and we should start by joining the OECS first and then try to entice Guyana the next power house into the group after which the rest will follow.

    Like

  42. Vincent Haynes June 6, 2017 at 8:54 AM #

    The patient could have been saved 3 years ago with homegrown bushtea but as the patients religious persuasion told him not too,he refused it.

    His condition is now critical,no bushtea or bath can save him but a foreign team of specialists are ready to operate and save his life which he refuses due to his persuasion.

    Now we have most family members saying yes to the foreign surgeons and a few objecting vehemently that the patient must be saved by homegrown remedies only.

    ……but they cannot be found.
    ……what to do.
    …..should he live with foreign aid.
    …..or is it better to die proud for a lack of homegrown medicine.
    ………stay tuned to this epic saga of life and death,playing out at a cinema near you.

    Like

  43. millertheanunnaki June 6, 2017 at 8:58 AM #

    @ Bush Tea June 6, 2017 at 6:53 AM
    “Bushie do NOT play that shiite game.
    Don’t want to hear him….
    Don’t want to see him…
    Not joining with him…
    Tell him to ‘haul his donkey’ and go away…
    He is playing that he is a ‘Saul of Tarsus’…
    But is was not God that struck him blind and gave him a vision…
    …it was Stinkliar who fired his tail …and who started his nightmare.
    So tell him that he is no Paul … He is more of a Judas.”

    Despite your misogyny, deep down you are more of a morally ‘decent’ man that you project superficially.

    Bushie, that is what you would call a perfect case of poetic justice at play.

    Unless he confesses to the public about that the ‘true’ whereabouts of that missing $300 million in foreign reserves going back to the post-2013 election then Pontius William Skinner can dish out as many indulgences, pontificate and pretend to forgive that lying man his sins but until Jesus returns to rejoin him on a cross he will always be seen as a Judas.

    Karma is a bitch and will always bite in their ‘retributive’ donkeys all those wicked people who throw stones at her.

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: