Dr. Malcom Grant posted an interesting piece on his Facebook Page SURVIVING OUR HARSH ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT titled The Silent Majority. Although the thesis of his article addresses the many members who chose NOT to contribute to discussion, the same can be said that there is a reluctance by the majority of Barbadians to actively participate in our democracy. The question to be asked is whether the apathy being shown by Barbadians is fuelled by ignorance or is it a flaw in how we manage our society.

David Barbados Underground

Definitions:
1. The Silent Majority is an unspecified large majority of people in a country or group who do not express their opinions publicly. In the online context this means that there is no Digital Participation. Those in the Silent Majority are synonymously referred to as Lurkers.

2. Digital Participation is essentially making ones presence online in such a manner so others can see. This ranges from publishing online articles to simply clicking a Like button.

3. Participation Inequality consists of difference between the levels of participation of various individuals within any given group or activity.

Background

SOHEE was founded on August 21, 2011. However, since our inception it has been noted that we only observed Digital Participation from a miniscule number (<5%) of our members. This fact at face value, was not only bewildering but also inexplicable and somewhat disturbing. I decided to research this phenomenon and was quite surprised with my finding which I shall share with you.

For this research the Internet was my exclusive source of information.

Global Rules Governing Digital Participation

There are essentially two well quoted and respected rules governing Digital Participation.
There is the 90-9-1 rule and there is the 1% rule.

The Jakob Nielsen 90-9-1 rule essentially found that user participation was more or less as follows::
• 90% of users are lurkers (i.e., read or observe, but don’t contribute).
• 9% of users only contribute from time to time.
• 1% account for most contributions

Interestingly a very recently published 2014 study which was published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (Trevor van Mierlo) more or less confirmed that the 90-9-1 rule also held true re Digital Health Support Groups for such conditions as depression, alcoholism, smoking cessation, etc.)

The 1% rule (Will Hill, Ben McConnell and Jackie Huba) on the other hand found that in the Internet Culture, only 1% of the users of any given Internet Group actively do create new content, while the other 99% of the participants are Lurkers.

Some Listed Reasons Why Many Remain A Part Of The Silent Majority
1. A personal choice
2. Fear of victimization/ embarrassment
3. Shyness
4. It has already been said
5. Just around for the learning
6. They do not feel called to action
7. Don’t let too much phase them
8. Don’t have the time or energy for exchanges
9. Already engaged otherwise
10. Technophobic issues
11. Communication skills issues
12. Critical thinking skills issues
13. Information/ Knowledge gap
14. Unequal access to technology
15. Inadequate digital/ media literacies

How Does One Eliminate Participatory Inequality?

Simple answer: You can’t. Self imposed participatory inequality seems to be a self engrained human social quirk which there is little anyone can do in order to change such a phenomenon. There is no online community that is randomly drawn from the surrounding community, which is immune to such.

The best one may ultimately hope to achieve is to reduce the number of Lurkers in any given online group. One much appreciate, at the end of the day, the Lurkers will constitute the vast majority of any online group. However, some of the suggested ways that we can reduce the size of the Silent Majority:
• Widen content
• Simplify points
• Zero tolerance for bullying
• Pin post that are of high quality
• Praise post that are of high quality
• Actively encourage more quality contributors to join SOHEE
• Encourage those who post to use powerful images as opposed to text only, when getting across their point
• Be as inclusive as possible re membership so that others may find someone that they can link with
• Personally engage Lurkers who you know are more than capable of contributing

Conclusion
We have to appreciate that in online communities such as SOHEE, the vast majority of its members, upwards of 90%, are not going to participate and often just simply lurk in the background.

In stark contrast, a tiny minority of users, approximately 1% of the membership, account for almost 100% of the content.

Such participation inequality is not structured or set in stone, for whenever the Lurkers rarely want to contribute there is nothing or no one stopping them from doing so.

Unfortunately some of those 1% contributing to the content of the site contribute to a disproportionately high signal to noise ratio, in that their copious postings are often of low quality, often drowning out high quality postings. Ultimately this can turn many away from the site, because they just simply do not have the time and cannot make the effort to distill out the gems. Therein often lies a major challenge.

It should also be noted that the Lurkers are not pigeonholed, for some of today’s Lurkers can become tomorrow’s 1%.

In the final analysis the Lurkers aka the Silent Majority, will ALWAYS constitute the majority of SOHEE’s members. It was a relief when it was found out that the Silent Majority was not something peculiar to SOHEE because of any unique or inherent idiosyncrasy. As a matter of fact, the silent majority seems to be the norm for all groups – online or otherwise – randomly drawn

from the population at hand.

BTW when you are looking through your list of facebook friends to add to SOHHE, by far and away the vast majority of those friends are going to eventually be part of SOHEE’s Silent Majority. Please don’t let this deter you from adding such persons. To actively and systematically marginalize this group or persons, will ultimately be tantamount to punishing persons for a characteristic that is often second nature to them. And who knows, you may be adding these friends to the first group that they have belonged to, which they can feel comfortable spreading their wings. For we at SOHEE now understand them better than most.

60 responses to “The Silent Majority”

  1. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Hal Austin May 4, 2017 at 10:25 AM

    What are you on about, Hal?

    The current administration cannot even pay salaries or even tax refunds without resorting to the printing of money. A practice you claim to abhor unless it is for infrastructural investment purposes. Yet you want to rebrand something that is working effectively as it is in Bermuda, Cayman & the Turk & Caicos Islands.

    Stuart is the man who recently blamed colonialism for the country’s current fiscal strictures. But you hardly keep abreast of the nonsense emanating from the local political jokers, right the very deep Hal?

    Nelson is just a red-herring which British tourists hardly notice so don’t make a Lilliputian statue out of a giant foreign hero.

    The same the Brits sold the original London Bridge to the Americans. So Barbados can donate Lord Nelson to the Antiguans where he rightly belongs in his own dockyard looking over his own harbour in exchange for the relocation of the LIAT HQ to Little England where financially and operationally it rightly belongs.

    Now if you were to disband the local Defence force (something strongly supported) who would be paid to be on standby to “crack heads and shoot people” should they be deemed the enemies of the DLP state under a republic of the African version?

    That is one area which- far from seeing any cut backs- has seen significant increases in the expenditure budget over the years while education and health have taken big hits.

    We can talk all we like but there is one institution which will remain insulated from any rebranding. Those proud houses of Parliament where over 375 years of colonial history will reign supreme; mace and all!

  2. Vincent Haynes Avatar
    Vincent Haynes

    Miller

    Antigua would be only too happy for the statue,contrary to ignorant Bimmers they have turned a negative into a great tourist and yachting attraction.

    Bimmers are too confused within themselves over how to deal with the aftermath of slavery that was abolished almost 200 years ago…..beyond me to see how creating false heroes, ridding oneself of Nelson and getting reparations(whatever that is) will change the past……the legacy of UWI.


  3. Miller,

    I guess you want an argument. You are the one talking about rebranding, I said any such cost would be minimal. I suggest you re-read the various postings. I suggest you look at your 5.41am posting when you talked nonsense about constitutional crisis.
    What is all this about Stuart and fiscal difficulties; you raised the matter and I said it went back to independence, of all parties. In other words, such a suggestion is nonsense. Without being rude, I have views about Stuart and he certainly does not understand macroeconomics – nor, by the way, does Owen Arthur.
    Now you are rambling on about Nelson. Again I pointed out an historical fact: that the Welsh, Irish and Scots were in Barbados before the slaves. Is that incorrect?
    I am out of this discussion. It is going nowhere.

  4. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Hal Austin May 4, 2017 at 12:22 PM
    “What is all this about Stuart and fiscal difficulties; you raised the matter and I said it went back to independence, of all parties. In other words, such a suggestion is nonsense. Without being rude, I have views about Stuart and he certainly does not understand macroeconomics – nor, by the way, does Owen Arthur.”

    Tsk, tsk dear Hal! Aren’t you being a tad too ‘shallow’ here?

    Is that the light in which you see those estimable prime ministers of your dear beloved land?

    Even the 7th standard boys from your Ivy League college would have done a better job; don’t you think?

    Or you- with your ego well inscribed on one of those lost plaques equivalent to a Bajan version of the Rosetta stone- would show those nincompoops a thing or two on how to manage a small island economy with less than the population of the ethnically diverse Brent or Hackney to handle?

    The miller was as surprised if not pissed off with that crap which was ejected from the mouth of that boy from Marchfield who fancies himself as a proud member not only from the slave-owning house of the Stuarts but also as a right honourably outstanding member of the inner sanctum of Oriel College of that Oxfordshire’s higher school of learning.

    BTW, the “Welsh, Irish and Scots” were not only ‘barbadoesed’ they were sent as white slaves to other islands including St, Kitts/Nevis and Jamaica.

    Just look at the names so proudly worn by the modern-day black slaves (including Miller and Austin) and you would get a flare of understanding of what you are up against in any battle over reparations.


  5. Miller,

    Have you been drinking?

  6. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Hal Austin May 4, 2017 at 1:36 PM

    No! Just smoking for enlightenment. Just like you with your stratospheric views on foreign reserves.

    How the hell can a two-bit forex-dependent country build-up a sovereign wealth fund to gamble with in the international finance casino unless it earns its way in the world and save some of it for such risky pursuits?

    But we are not surprised at your position. Only the Guyana-born DPP with the “Bajan” sounding name would be amused.


  7. 5 days of real Test cricket culminating in a WIN for West Indies. Sweeeeeeet!

    Apologies to those of you who have different priorities.

  8. Simple Simon Avatar

    @The gospel according to Donville and Carson C. Cadogan May 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM And then you have a few individuals who really don’t give a damn…and who believe that the best thing that they can achieve is to see the back of Democratic Labour Party,” Inniss said.”

    Why do you guys make it seem as thought this would be a bad thing?

    LOL

  9. Simple Simon Avatar

    @The gospel according to Donville and Carson C. Cadogan May 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM “they are all are Barbadians and your country must come first and foremost.”

    Can somebody please tell dem fellers that the DLP and Barbados are not the same thing.

    Many of us love Barbados.

    But we don’t love the DLP one little bit.

  10. Simple Simon Avatar

    @Hal Austin May 4, 2017 at 9:38 AM “are you talking about reparations? At some point we must look forward and not backwards all the time.”

    We are indeed looking forward–to the reparations.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading