The Ronnie Yearwood Lecture

The duration of the lecture is over two hours but worth the listen. Many of the views shared my Dr. Ronnie Yearwood last night have been mooted repeatedly on BU. It is important a greater number of Barbadians from the academic class step out of the comfort zone to challenge the establishment. It is evident- even to the ignorant  -that our system needs remodelling. We need our brightest to lead the way.

Advertisements

Tags: ,

123 Comments on “The Ronnie Yearwood Lecture”

  1. Bush Tea April 15, 2017 at 9:08 AM #

    @ Vincent
    …possibly its time for cooperatives to get a community arm and bring all into the fold.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Absolutely brilliant thinking Boss…
    Bumpy did not labour in vain….

    Like

  2. Vincent Haynes April 15, 2017 at 9:16 AM #

    Bushie

    Well start doing it then…..I have time on my hands for computer work and when in Bim quite willing to assist with field work.

    Yours and Millers reference to Bumpy Moore,shows that you were under his headship…..I was under Stanton of…Jesu(i)s I am,a fool thou art….fame.

    Like

  3. David April 15, 2017 at 9:26 AM #

    @Vincent, Bushie, Miller, Gabriel

    Salvete Oh Elders of BU!

    Like

  4. Shontelle R. Brathwaite April 15, 2017 at 9:36 AM #

    The Basque country is the only place with a tree? Bearded Fig Tree is the Caribbean’s tree, Banyan is the Phillipines tree…seeing green veins through your skin is natural to many people…some people are disturbingly myopic and narrow minded

    Like

  5. Enuff April 15, 2017 at 9:37 AM #

    The folks from Waterford are all over this blog..lol.

    Like

  6. Hants April 15, 2017 at 9:57 AM #

    Loyalty of the ” alumni “….. Cawmere Kolij Lodge Foundation CP.

    Another part of the problem.

    Like

  7. Vincent Haynes April 15, 2017 at 10:03 AM #

    Hants April 15, 2017 at 9:57 AM #

    Loyalty of the ” alumni “….. Cawmere Kolij Lodge Foundation CP.

    Another part of the problem.
    ………………………………………………

    Chuckle….one thing that can be said of the Cawmere alumni is that they do not rice from the same bowl.

    We were schooled under “up and on” to think critically and not to accept even from our fellow alumnus things that are not factual or cogent.

    Like

  8. Money Brain April 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM #

    Bushie, I am actually with you on most of what you have written on this topic. I am not so sure that we are seeing the ground swell that should be already very apparent. Where are the true patriotic ACTION oriented leaders?

    Like

  9. NorthernObserver April 15, 2017 at 11:24 AM #

    No @MB I was referring to HRC, wasn’t she the one with e-mail issues? Our skipper McGuffy’s ‘office’ (as he had nuttin to do with it??) erased thousands of e-mails off a government server. ‘Love’ was used tongue in cheek. The pols en want nuttin with teets. They want something with holes but something they can say ‘we got it’.

    Like

  10. de pedantic Dribbler April 15, 2017 at 11:42 AM #

    @Vincent at 10:03 AM re “….one thing that can be said of the Cawmere alumni is that they do not rice from the same bowl. We were schooled under “up and on” to think critically …”

    So you surely you can’t be saying that peeps from Foundation or St. Michael or Deighton Griffith under the sterling early work of Blackman are any less ‘cogent’ and able to ‘think critically’. LOLL, oh mi, oh my!!

    @David April 14, at 8:46 PM # We generally dissect political leadership into its tiniest parts but realistically it is what it is and has been for centuries.

    So I suggest there can really be no great fear in your remarks that “How does one define leadership if it must be in step with what the people desire all the time” for a few very simple reasons.

    Every politician must equally lead from behind or if you prefer, ‘follow from the front’ as I believe the Bushman said above, and also decisively take actions that are broadly unpopular.

    In modern times of course polling has become the pervasive weather-vane for political direction as almost every act is measured. But again realistically those polls are no more than technological ‘overhype’ of an old fad. It is all about shrewd consultants and universities using tech to make an excellent living.

    What is a poll if nothing else than a snapshot of popular opinion at a given moment..it can be absolute meaningless in properly capturing the real will of a society…as indeed a referendum can be sometimes—- And that is a key aspect of your point I suspect!

    Anecdotally, can’t it be argued that EWB responded to ‘poll data’ when he pressed for independence! No big argument (he was a decisive leader) but on that matter as much as he surely seemed to be leading from the front he was also ‘directing’ the will and desires of many!

    So in brief: the very essence of a political leader means that you have risen to the top because you can be decisive and that you can also carefully harness the intentions and ‘collective desires’ of a majority of the populace ….

    Of course the politician can never fulfill the majority desires all the time but let’s not fool ourselves that a political career doesn’t come to a natural end as soon as leaders stop acting towards that objective.

    After all, that is the goal of politics: self aggrandizement while fooling the masses that you are pandering to their desires!

    Like

  11. Vincent Haynes April 15, 2017 at 12:42 PM #

    dpD

    Chuckle…….feel free like I did to highlight the critical thinking nature of your schooling……no put down was intended,it was but a simple defence against the insinuations of Hants……my apologies are available if needed.

    Like

  12. Vincent Haynes April 15, 2017 at 12:44 PM #

    Bushie

    The following is the reason why the sheeple must be led along the correct path:-

    Like

  13. millertheanunnaki April 15, 2017 at 1:13 PM #

    @ David April 15, 2017 at 7:05 AM
    “BU is not here to defend Ronnie but what do you expect in a 90 minute presentation? His was a rallying call and he used governance and the abdication of the people in our democracy as the key talking points. Cut the guy some slack. How many politicians AND prominent politicians who would have been able to fill the Grande Salle at the central bank? Let us give him some support and see where it leads, we have nothing to lose at this stage.”

    All that has been said is just a rehash and regurgitation of what has been discussed ad nauseam in the BU talk shop and other mainstream media.

    Isn’t what this guy discussing the same old hat which gave rise to the call for ITAL and FOI prior to 2008 and enticingly re-listed in the both parties 2013 manifestoes especially promised under the DLP’s four sound pillars of administration?

    David Thompson was supposed to have been the Messiah in 2008. Has Ronnie Y taken over the baton?

    It’s time the talk ceases and action begins. Who are you going to listen to? A parrot speaking about matters discussed even before 2008 or Grenville the engineer who, like OSA, has given you 90 days to save the country’s sorry ass?

    First save the economy from imminent collapse and you might just be able to entertain the luxury of what ought to be in a blissfully blind state of so-called good governance in 2×3 incestuous Barbados where all the right laws are on the books but enforcement a major disaster.

    It’s the economy, stupid! No economy means no functioning society for people to complain about.

    Like

  14. de pedantic Dribbler April 15, 2017 at 2:12 PM #

    @Vincent, no put-down taken. For the purposes of BU debate I am school-less…i.e. no affiliation needed.

    To paraphrase a line from that old, old cop show ‘Dragnet’: “Just the facts bro… the stories you read here are true, just the school has been changed to protect the innocent …. or in some cases the guilty!” LOLL

    Like

  15. Pachamama April 15, 2017 at 2:39 PM #

    David

    You have too charitably underestimated the borrowings from BU of this Ronnie Yearwood

    Indeed, it is only the leading lights of BU you have shown the courage to engage these issues at the highest philosophical levels and with a radical creativity.

    Unlike you, we heard the voice of Bushie and others, we must say.

    Do not be fooled, we are almost sure that most of the ideas being discussed by Yearwood come from here, need we repeat!

    On the other hand you have your fair burden of the ugly man from england. A man who has never said anything worthy of serious contemplation except in their level of ignorance.

    Yet he is one of those who is so delighted by this Yearwood. That’s a fool’s errand.

    We remember well how Hillary Beckles was so able to enthrall the people of Barbados with his good looks and and chosen ‘superior’ mother tongue – the perceived most handsome man around.

    Yearwood is disadvantage by a lisp. We invite the women to determine handsomeness.

    Beckles was acting in the service of self and lacked intent to rush the Bastille. We see the same malice and forethought here with this Yearwood.

    This Yearwood has no larger goals than self.

    Ugly idiots rush in where fools never tred.

    And the ugly man from england was never an original thinker. But a follower always looking for somebody’s bandwagon to jump on.

    People like Bushie and Piece, for example, always have some original idea to present.

    William Skinner has some unique ideas for tourism development which are worth millions of dollars in consultancies fees, not so with that ugly man.

    Unfortunately, they seem to often agree. Well ……….

    We are not at all persuaded that Yearwood’s argumentations are complete. For us they are untenable at the root because he seeks to enter a new world with one foot, while having the next firmly planted in a decadent system. Transformation from thus cannot therefore be spawned.

    Yearwood ignores and confuses the potency of new-economy dynamics while assuming that old-economy norms, thinking, should be traditionally rated, measured, depended upon. Poor ‘fellow’.

    Of course, we have a broader critique.

    Like

  16. Money Brain April 15, 2017 at 3:01 PM #

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK3lyNR_vV8

    How to Develop Sustainable Growth.

    Like

  17. David April 15, 2017 at 3:04 PM #

    @Pacha

    It doesn’t matter where the source of the inspiration for those willing to be advocates in our fragile democracy come from. Let us support them until we have reason not to because there are no guarantees anyway.

    Yearwood from young has obviously shown a healthy interest in the civics and politics. His track record of community work seems thin and this is probably why he ran second to Sandra Husbands. BU will take him ahead of many who have gained the nomination to run for both parties. The culture in Barbados will not allow anybody to successfully run a message to dismantle the establishment. It is not a pragmatic approach and you know it.

    As far as who are the purveyors of wisdom in the BU family – see the any achievement linked to the collective read the dullards and the intelligent.

    Like

  18. Observing April 15, 2017 at 6:35 PM #

    @miller

    “It’s the economy, stupid”

    Correct!

    Put that next to Forest who said that “stupid is as stupid does!”

    Still Observing

    Like

  19. A Rose By Any Other Name heheheheheh April 15, 2017 at 6:40 PM #

    @ the Honourable Blogmaster

    I posted this before but it did not come out the “bin” as yet so I will post it again

    I wonder how many bajans are listening to the call in programs?

    I wonder how many observers realize that the apathetic and those who now don’t vote outnumber those who do?

    I wonder if Ronnie Yearwood is hearing the clamour?

    I wonder how many are seeing the shift? and those like Andrew Simpson who are starting to comprehend The Third Movement?

    You think that Ronnie Yearwood heard it?

    You think that he heard the Word? spoken in the quiet storm while he resorted to The Word of The Almighty Living GOD?

    Did he hear how a representative of the most affluent people came and tossed down the gauntlet in the sand and stated what their change agenda is?

    You think that when he reads this article that he would comprehend that running on Mugabe’s coat tails is a waste of his talent?

    I wonder if he will be true to that “forlorn” state he speaks of hearing for the first time on Brass Tacks as recalibrate his gun sights?

    Does he not understand those prophetic words spoken at The Grande Salle Room?

    Come to badword out from among the “female mutilation crowd” and run with a new Change Agenda and stand behind the words he used so eloquently.

    Mugabe and Fumbles will fear men like you and the Peter Lawrence Thompsons’ who when you speak, inspire hope

    My man Ronnie Y there are enough of you, white, black, Indian Syrian change expousers who, armed with the correct tools can MAKE THIS WORK AND MAKE THIS HAPPEN!

    Why stay with the sheep like Ralph and Eddie and the rest of them who were in the back row on thursday night, and with Sandra and Jerome etc WHEN YOU CAN CHART that path which I am relaibly informed that you have copied, albeit rather nicely.

    Like

  20. fortyacresandamule. April 15, 2017 at 8:00 PM #

    Be careful of aspiring politicians who have a ‘gift for gab’. It is crypnonite to Suckers and Brass Bowls.

    Like

  21. Money Brain April 15, 2017 at 9:14 PM #

    The Skippa and Tom could talk sweeeeet??????????

    Like

  22. SuckaBubby April 15, 2017 at 11:54 PM #

    We were told almost all we need to know nearly 30 years ago

    Like

  23. Hal Austin April 16, 2017 at 9:06 AM #

    David,
    There is no silver bullet, but at least Ronnie has intervened in a national debate that lacks analytical input. The usual predators, who have nothing of real interest to contribute, are out there once more attacking Ronnie rather than critiquing his views.
    Of course a lot of what Ronnie has to say is off key, but at least it is intellectually interesting. For example, his vies on the tax on the brain drain and the mobility of income taxation, taken from the authoritarian American system, are untenable.
    Let us debate those opinions rather than attribute unethical behaviour to the man. I suggest a close reading of Archie Brown’s The Myth of the Strong Leader.
    I would have liked to see more attention given to the state of education in the island, given the meltdown of our education unions and the inept leader of the present minister.
    A progressive educational system is the foundation of modern society, and no such debate is taking place in Barbados.
    For starters, how about getting each and every secondary school to publish the full unredacted results of its CXC results? Let parents know which schools are underperforming and which, if any, are over-performing; let parents and taxpayers know if we are getting a decent return on the investment we out in the educational system.
    Trust and integrity come out of a society in which merit and fairness are the underlying pillars of our public culture. Ronnie could have dealt with some of these wider ethical issues. But he has made a start and is of a generation that must take up the baton and lead us out of the new slavery.

    Like

  24. David April 16, 2017 at 9:14 AM #

    @Hal

    Agree with the thrust of your comment but it is always the expectation that those offering themselves to be disrupters or leaders must table perspectives that serve to stimulate and mobilise the people. We have entered an era where populist positions is the lazy approach and exposes the pretenders. Ronnie must not fall into following this well trodden path.

    Like

  25. Hal Austin April 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM #

    Agree.

    Like

  26. de pedantic Dribbler April 16, 2017 at 10:27 AM #

    Mr Blogmaster, I appreciate your dismay about populist leaders and thus your recent dismissal of leaders who ‘follow from the front’ but I cannot agree with the essence of your comment that “We have entered an era where populist positions is the lazy approach and exposes the pretenders. Ronnie must not fall into following this well trodden path”.

    This simply DISMISSES the realities of ‘modern’ political history.

    Populism has been the backbone of Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Che Guevara and innumerable of their Lat-Am colleagues.

    Quibble about the men as much as one desires but Adolf Hitler, Tito and their Italian ‘brethren’ rode the unruly stallions of populism.

    Surely the modern day Italian Berlusconi with his bigger than life personality as a soccer team owner and media baron was the populism template for the current populist in the White House.

    And what was Syriza’s Tsipras if not a supreme populist.

    I am not a historian nor political scientist but as an ‘opinionated’ layman I must opine that this current BU line of historical revisionism is remarkable.

    How can ‘populism’ which is essentially the sway and will of the people NOT be the force to drive politicians!!!

    And yes @Hal, that book by Brown should be additional required reading for all of us who pontificate on politics and leadership.

    “… The more decisions are taken by one person…that person’s aides find themselves ….taken decisions in the name of the leader. That is just one reason why the allure of strong leadership being exercised by a single person at the top of the political [leadership] should be resisted.”
    – Myth of a Strong Leader

    There is nothing new about populism per se but everything dangerously bad about those who ride its waves to power only to enforce their own forms of debilitating authoritarianism….enter stage right and left examples as Presidents Assisi, Erdogan, Maduro…

    Given half a chance so too would be Pres Trump!

    Fellows like Yearwood are aggressive neophytes. Good on him!

    Let him roil the populist fervor as much as he can…he is certainly doing nothing more than other political wannabees of long past. And certainly he has studied them well.

    So maybe his enthusiastic regurgitation of ‘popular’ palaver will actually inflame the imagination of Bajans to action.

    Like

  27. David April 16, 2017 at 11:01 AM #

    @Dee Word

    Dont you have it ass backwards? All the individuals you presented as examples of leaders did they not sway the people by their narrative?

    Like

  28. Hal Austin April 16, 2017 at 11:12 AM #

    de pedantic,

    You are right to warn about the rise of populism, but this is not new and has a long history. Marx warned us about this working class false consciousness, which in time led to alienation from their labour, the products of their labour, and eventually from humanity.
    We saw it when the Marist Revolution collapsed in Germany in 1919, when German workers threw their weight behind the rise of Nazism. We still see the rise, from simple murmurs to louds voices of this populism in the US and Europe.
    Not very long ago in this forum I warned about giving unconditional support to workers’ organisations. Hitler’s storm troopers were once trade unionists; Moseley was once a Labour Party minister and his supporters East End trade unionists. There sis a very thin line between trade union militancy and authoritarianism.
    Again, I have warned those people not particularly knowledgeable about UK politics that the Brexit vote on June 23 had nothing to do with Britain in Europe, but was the British working class revenge for the transformation of the UK in to a multi-racial, multi-cultural society and the rescuing of Enoch Powell from the political graveyard to that of hero. That is now being recognised by some thinkers in the UK.
    Two outstanding Caribbean thinkers on this ideological drift, the late great Jamaica-born Stuart Hall, and our own late Leroy Harewood, a man marginalised by Errol and a local political elite not fit to was his feet. It was Hall who defined Thatcherism.
    If you want to see how historically monopoly capitalism is organised, I suggest Dark Money, by Jane Meyer, on how the super-rich throw their money behind the far right.
    It is not by coincidence that former Golden Sachs billionaires are over-represented in the Trump team. Equally we must debate the similarities in our own local way, of the wealthy throwing their money privately (secretly?) behind new political formations in Barbados. Be careful what you pray for.
    Keeping the people in ignorance by discussing personalities, character assassinations ridicule, rather than sticking to the issues have long-term repercussions.
    The new world order spells the end of the Westphalian nation state, there is no way back. If we mess up this time it is lights out.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. de pedantic Dribbler April 16, 2017 at 2:55 PM #

    @David April 16, 2017 at 11:01 AM re ” Dont you have it ass backwards? All the individuals you presented as examples of leaders did they not sway the people by their narrative?”

    Please tell me you are joking!

    They led well and they spoke superbly on the poplar themes of the day. Surely some of them also were integral in developing that narrative but to divorce the entire process from the populism of an era and place an individual leader completely ahead of the fray is incomprehensible.

    So Fidel ORIGINATED and totally directed his nation absent a ground swell of populist dismay, anger and disgust by the fed-up masses…..So too Bussa was the ORIGINAL catalyst or EWB the ORIGINAL VOICE of leadership circa 1960s whether it was Independence or free education… Fah real!

    Great men all. But to offer that they led and developed the narrative of their people sans any groundswell of populism is …. a jest with great zest, surely!!!

    I am a cynic, as I fully embrace Nicco Machiavelli’s eternally relevant ‘The Prince’ as my political guide, particularly the statement: “The promise given was a necessity of the past: the word broken is a necessity of the present”.

    So surely I am not as impressed as you appear of the wondrous originality of these leaders….applause definitely to their leadership acumen!

    Yes, @Hal…there is absolutely nothing new about populism as a political theme and certainly nothing new where young aspirants embrace such to gain traction and to have their voices heard politically.

    I would add to your statement vis “It is not by coincidence that former Golden Sachs billionaires are over-represented in the Trump team” to say it’s really not a right wing cabal thing…but a monied sect model.

    As you know Obama and before him Clinton also had Wall St millionaires as part of their apparatus. Off the top of my head I can recall Clinton had Rubin (former Goldman CEO) as Sec of Treasurer.

    There also was Lew who came in late to Obama’s cabinet who worked at Citigroup at the heart of the debacle on the housing market.

    So yes, Trump has gone to the n’th level with his millionaire cabinet of financial market leaders but the Dems play well in that arena also.

    Like

  30. fortyacresandamule April 16, 2017 at 4:19 PM #

    @Dribbler. Same here. I am the quintessential cynic and sceptic all roll -up in one. The Prince, and the Art of War are among the top of my reading list.

    Like

  31. fortyacresandamule April 16, 2017 at 4:42 PM #

    The mass live in eternal hope and optimism. Constantly looking for political messiahs for inspirations or to improve their material welfare is their greatest weakness. And the end result is always the same…dissapointment. With a short memory span, no sooner the cycle continues.

    Like

  32. David April 16, 2017 at 4:47 PM #

    @fortyacresanamule

    How are you able to condition change based on humans eradicating the thought of hope from our minds.

    Like

  33. Vincent Haynes April 16, 2017 at 4:56 PM #

    fortyacresandamule April 16, 2017 at 4:42 PM #

    Well put……the reason why, being in need of a crutch as they lack belief in self and always need a validater who they construe as an image of themselves.

    It all started with the original crutch…..religion…..from that creation with its own supreme leader man continued forming governance systems akin to his original creation who in turn validated it…..the endles gyre..

    Like

  34. Gabriel April 16, 2017 at 6:28 PM #

    I think Yearwood has whet the appetite of the discerning Barbadian.It appears questions from the floor had to be guillotined owing to a late start.Both parties but in particular the DLP must be crapping bricks.This meeting and the participative element sends a message……we have had enough of the nastiness from Stuart and his minions of clueless pothounds who are all after a food and money.When one adds the success of the BLP marches now being copied by this non performing DLP cabinet,Stuart must know the writing is on the wall and it’s all over bar the shouting.The main thrust is to get the 40% of the electorate who withheld their vote last time out,to encourage them to go to the polls next year and rout these liars and thieves called the DLP. One has only to read today’s Sun and the comments of Don Marshall based on non existent figures to recognize the guess work of the Dems.

    Like

  35. curious April 16, 2017 at 7:12 PM #

    It was not lack of community service that stop him that is how the establishment works. Pick who they want by enrolling persons to vote before the required time limit to be a member. He is a young man and the DLP has now nominated three young men. Why could they not get together and challenge the two existing parties?
    Gabriel Why are you in a hurry to put back into parliament people who had fourteen years and did nothing significant for the society for example George Payne who did not speak for most of those fourteen tears, Glyne Clarke who had more scandals than you remember. I cannot remember which blog had this house posted that was for public housing but end up as a private home. We can do better

    Like

  36. pieceuhderockyeahright April 16, 2017 at 7:43 PM #

    @ Curious

    “we can do better”

    Four words that speak to the crux of this matter that encapsulate the whole forty yards and the mire that besieges us bajans.

    We seem to be enveigled by our “collective vomit” of the 50 years of successive administrations read DLP and BLP.

    And, like some ruminating mammal, we “bring back up” that which DID NOT WORK IN ITS HEYDAY and chew on it anew.

    That vomit comes in the form of incompetent ministers who, 14 years ago were younger yet at the height of their incompetencies and now, 14 years later, are even less wise and infinitely slower.

    Molasses and Syrup.

    We Have to Do Better Curious.

    We bajans now see what both of these groups of people are doing, have done AND WILL DO and what we have to do is to SAY NOW TO THEM BOTH AND CHART A NEW PATH that DOES NOT INCLUDE THEM

    Like

  37. Bush Tea April 16, 2017 at 7:56 PM #

    @ PUDRYR
    ….CHART A NEW PATH that DOES NOT INCLUDE THEM
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    That would be an error.

    They should be ‘included’ for educational purposes – to ensure that our brass bowl grandchildren do not make the same mistake all over again.

    ..They should be prosecuted and persecuted.
    ..They should be audited – and made to pay for all the shiite they did…
    ..They should be written about – in deep detail – all the sordid facts and bribes…
    ..History should record them as the dastardly scamps and traitors that they have been…

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Gabriel April 16, 2017 at 7:58 PM #

    Curious
    As I said…both parties but in particular the DLP must be crapping bricks….we want serious change in the governance of this country.Nothing less than a paradigm shift in the way things are done.I won’t like to see the arrogance of a Barney Lynch or Lowe et al ever again in a Barbados parliament.Our conditions of service must call for sacrifice and humility not the pompous assholes that are on both sides of the fence,so when I hear that JA Sanka Price talking about a minister should be paid more because he has the power of life and death over the citizenry,I say eff off scumbag it is the other way around.

    Like

  39. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger April 16, 2017 at 9:10 PM #

    Eye opening oredictions fir future economies.

    “By 2050, the world is likely to have changed drastically from what we know now, and the planet’s economic and financial landscape will be no exception.

    A report from professional services giant PwC looks at which economies around the world will be the biggest and most powerful in 33 years time.

    The report, titled “The long view: how will the global economic order change by 2050?” ranked 32 countries by their projected global gross domestic product by purchasing power parity.

    PPP is used by macroeconomists to determine the economic productivity and standards of living among countries across a certain time period.

    With the exception of the USA, many of the world’s current powerhouse economies like Japan and Germany will have slipped down global rankings, replaced by countries such as India and Indonesia, which are currently emerging markets.

    Check out the ranking below (All numbers cited in the slides are in US dollars and at constant values (for reference, the US’s current PPP is $18.562 trillion):

    Netherlands — $1.496 trillion.
    Colombia — $2.074 trillion.
    Poland — $2.103 trillion.
    Argentina — $2.365 trillion.
    Australia — $2.564 trillion.
    South Africa — $2.570 trillion.
    Spain — $2.732 trillion.
    Thailand — $2.782 trillion.
    Malaysia — $2.815 trillion.
    Bangladesh — $3.064 trillion.
    Canada — $3.1 trillion.
    Italy — $3.115 trillion.
    Vietnam — $3.176 trillion.
    Philippines — $3.334 trillion.
    South Korea — $3.539 trillion.
    Iran — $3.900 trillion.
    Pakistan — $4.236 trillion.
    Egypt — $4.333 trillion.
    Nigeria — $4.348 trillion.
    Saudi Arabia — $4.694 trillion.
    France — $4.705 trillion.
    Turkey — $5.184 trillion.
    United Kingdom — $5.369 trillion.
    Germany — $6.138 trillion.
    Japan — $6.779 trillion.
    Mexico — $6.863 trillion.
    Russia — $7.131 trillion.
    Brazil — $7.540 trillion.
    Indonesia — $10.502 trillion.
    United States — $34.102 trillion.
    India — $44.128 trillion.
    China — $58.499 trillion.

    Read more:

    business-insider.jpg
    • This chart is easy to interpret: It says we’re screwed
    • How Uber became the world’s most valuable startup
    • These 4 things could trigger the next crisis in Europe

    Read the original article on Business Insider UK. © 2016. Follow Business Insider UK on Twitter.”

    Like

  40. Vincent Haynes April 16, 2017 at 9:21 PM #

    We bajans now see what both of these groups of people are doing, have done AND WILL DO and what we have to do is to SAY NOW TO THEM BOTH AND CHART A NEW PATH that DOES NOT INCLUDE THEM.
    ……………………………………………….

    May not include them but will surely have their cousins,nephews,nieces,daughters,sons,etc,etc

    Sigh…..when will we learn that we have to make a total change…..forget the political class….lets concentrate on educating the sheeple away from the wukkup mentality……lets deal with community pressure groups that will form alliances and exert pressure on whoever is in parliament.

    Like

  41. Tron April 17, 2017 at 11:50 AM #

    WWC,

    “With the exception of the USA, many of the world’s current powerhouse economies like Japan and Germany will have slipped down global rankings, replaced by countries such as India and Indonesia, which are currently emerging markets.”

    Japan and Germany are like roaches. You can harm some, but they will come back … The climate in the South (eg India, Indonesia) is simply too hot for maximum efficiency and best work ethic. Read Montesquieu, De l’esprit des loix. Climate and geography explain a lot.

    Like

  42. Well Well & Consequences Observing Blogger April 17, 2017 at 3:55 PM #

    Yeah Tron.

    Like

  43. Simple Simon April 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM #

    @Vincent Haynes April 16, 2017 at 4:56 PM “It all started with the original crutch…religion”

    Since every society everywhere has some kind of religion, maybe religion is a necessity and not a crutch?

    Like

  44. Simple Simon April 17, 2017 at 4:45 PM #

    @Hal Austin April 16, 2017 at 9:06 AM “how about getting each and every secondary school to publish the full unredacted results of its CXC results? Let parents know which schools are underperforming and which, if any, are over-performing; let parents and taxpayers know if we are getting a decent return on the investment we out in the educational system.”

    There is no such thing as over performing.

    And even while I agree with you that the Ministry of Education and or CXC should long since have published each school’s CXC results, we must still be mindful that exam results, only measure exams. Students enter schools with different abilities, some children come from nurturing homes, some children come from deeply conflicted homes. Some parents have enough money to purchase enriching books, games, and activities fro their children, some do not. Some children live a calm 5 minute walk from their school, some spend an hour or more standing at a hot bus-stop and travelling in an overheated bus, while some children are driven right into the school yard in an air conditioned vehicle. And some children always have enough good quality food, some children’s brains are starved even while they are in the womb.

    All of these complexities must be taken into account when assessing an individual child, or assessing a particular school.

    A child who was hungry from within the womb and who has had a difficult life and yet who still manages to gain 3 CXC passes has probably worked harder and better that a more fortunate child who has gained 5 passes.

    Like

  45. Vincent Haynes April 17, 2017 at 4:49 PM #

    Simple Simon April 17, 2017 at 4:32 PM #

    We will agree to disagree……..just because you see a stream of lemmings jumping off the cliff edge to certain death year after year……why would you not have the urge to join them?

    We all have a brain,some of us have it in its unadulterated state which allows us to comprehend and think through things and arrive at conclusions…..note the conclusion maybe to not conclude due to lack of enough knowledge/solid foundation to construct your edifice on.

    Like

  46. Hal Austin April 17, 2017 at 5:03 PM #

    Simple Simon,
    School officials predicted exam outcomes. That is why Oxford and Cambridge can offer kids places even before they take the exams. If you do better than predicted then you have over-performed (or out-performed the expectation).
    At St Giles JO Morris was a past master at predicting the 11+ exam. I agree that the value a schools adds is important, but the key metric is exam results. We want the results for every secondary school published, and the unions should be demanding this. I was told by a CXC official that the ministry gets broken down results.
    Why don’t the press call for these results to be made public? The reality is that after 11 years in the public education system lots of people – too many – leave just about able to read and write. It is a pitiable system.

    Like

  47. David April 17, 2017 at 7:19 PM #

    Thoughts?

    Patrick Cozierto Social Accountability and Education in Barbados

    5 hrs ·

    As promised I now offer a set of recommendations/ suggestions on improving governance and transparency. Edition 1.

    1) the Executive decision making is in the hands of politicians. At times the political imperatives that drive such executive decision making may collide with the national interest. To mitigate this, perhaps the time has come to separate Executive and Legislature. MPs will constitute the legislature and the PM will pick his/her Cabinet from amongst the rest of the population, based on best suitability.

    2) presently, a very small group selects the PM. I suggest that the PM should run nationwide and be elected on the basis of majority of popular vote, and thus would have a genuine national mandate.

    3) the Public Accounts Committee should be replaced by a Public Accountability Committee reporting to the GG. It would be 9-11 members strong, 2 of whom will represent the 2 parties in Parliament (1 each), while the remaining membership will represent sectoral interests, e.g Labour, business, etc, and the sectors will determine their representative to sit on this committee.

    4) Election campaigns should be financed by the state.

    5) Election date should be specified, e.g. First Tuesday in September, every 5 years. If circumstances occasion the collapse of the Government, the GG can determine that a new election be held within 90 days of such collapse.

    6) Establish a Contractor General’s office with responsibility for all public sector tenders, contract awards and delivery compliance. Such tenders and awards should be published as public information and transparency.

    7) Pass the Freedom of Information Act as soon as possible.

    I will leave these 7 initial points on the table for discussion or critique. Edition 2 coming shortly, will further address the issue of governance and transparency. Look forward to your comments and further thoughts.

    Like

  48. Money Brain April 24, 2017 at 4:26 PM #

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOs7YCwHrXA

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: