dueck1

To DPP Charles Leacock: Why Did you Drop the Case Against the Duecks?

Director of Public Prosecutions, Charles Leacock

Director of Public Prosecutions, Charles Leacock

Many Barbadians read the story that appeared in yesterday’s media Charges dropped against couple with some interest including members of the BU household. Why did Director of Public Prosecutions Charles Leacock QC drop the matter against Barry and Barbara Dueck? You mean to say not even one charge could have been prosecuted out of the five :-

  1. Money Laundering
  2. Theft
  3. Buying and selling foreign currency, to wit, United States currency, to people unknown outside of Barbados without the permission of the exchange control authority of the Central Bank of Barbados.
  4. Charged  with carrying on an international financial service when he was not licensed to do so by the Central Bank.
  5. Charged that he held himself out as a trader in securities without being registered with the Financial Services Commission

Poor Philip Nicholls must be wondering what must a man do to have money laundering charges dropped by DPP Charles Leacock.

  • Who are these two individuals who made the accusations, Jean Delangis of 411 St Peter’s Bay, Road View, St Peter and Robert Richardson of 10 Forest Hills, Royal Westmoreland, St James?
  • Did they ever attend court when the case was called multiple times?
  • Did they withdraw their complaint?
  • If they did and as the complainants in this case did they have to pay court costs and also for the resources expended by the court, police, prison etc and taxpayers of Barbados?
  • Did they use the Barbados court system and prosecutors with an accusation of theft for their own personal vindictive purposes?
  • Was the prosecution duped into bringing these charges on their behalf and is there a case of negligence/incompetence to be cited?
  • Has or does anyone in the prosecutors office ever golf and socialise with either of the theft accusers Jean Delangis  and or Robert Richardson?
  • Were some of the charges like money laundering, buying and selling foreign currency etc. simply “trumped up” without any basis whatsoever in law and would have been clear to any first year law student?

Can we expect a peer review of this case?

How about a careful analysis by the respectable traditional local media.

The public has a right to know!

Relevant link: Money laundering charges

Tags: , ,

58 Comments on “To DPP Charles Leacock: Why Did you Drop the Case Against the Duecks?”

  1. Well Well & Consequences October 4, 2016 at 2:59 AM #

    How about the information on why the charges were dropped being made public.., these people are trying to project innocence, which is highly unlikely. ., more likely than not, the money was repaid.

    But they should still be charged for acting like they were operating their own central bank in Barbados…will they be monitored going forward…..because once that scam is lucrative, they will do it again.

    Since the DPP Leacock cannot be trusted to prosecute certain people in the society, none of his actions nor anything he says can be trusted.

    Like

  2. Pachamama October 4, 2016 at 8:44 AM #

    @David

    This is business as usual.

    We remember well when this DPP walked into a court and informed the Magistrate that his office had no interests in pursuing charges against the son of a well-known journalist caught with hundreds of pound of marijuana.

    These kinds of back-room dealings happen all the time. Files can be made to disappear, pressures can be placed on certain people to decide cases outside of courts etc.

    David, this is your Barbados. What the country has always been.

    Like

  3. Hal Austin October 4, 2016 at 9:26 AM #

    When is this Guyana-born DPP going to retire?

    Like

  4. Gabriel October 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM #

    Leacock is in good company.He is a low lifer just like those in the DLP government.Johnny called him a canecutter.The idiots in the Anglican Church make him chancellor.A retired bishop summoned him to train him how to read a lesson at church.He stiffed the bishop,refused to turn up and changed Anglican churches instead.Dunlop put up with that.Freddie say Ricky owe Jagdeo a huge favour.Rickie two sons get caught with hundreds of pounds of ganja in Barbados.Shazzam boom!Leacock,guyanese,turn up in magistrates court and tell the court fine them instead of confining them.Connect the dots…..

    Like

  5. David October 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM #

    The DPP is about 62.

    Like

  6. FearPlay October 4, 2016 at 1:31 PM #

    “How about a careful analysis by the respectable traditional local media”. Hahahahahaha! OK, since you believe that one here’s another – Froon and his goons are good for Barbados and will get better as time goes on.”

    Like

  7. David October 4, 2016 at 2:26 PM #

    The general population can care less anyway.

    Like

  8. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 4, 2016 at 2:49 PM #

    De ole man was wondering how rather if dis story bout dese two fleecers purported, or should dat be purported fleecers?? was going to mek it to the light of day.

    Gabriel said earlier pun a nex blog someting to the effect of “when you white you right” and dese peeple who has been doing dis shyt##e for years is white and not COW nor Bizzy white dem is overseas white.

    De ole man does deal with details and ting.

    Now here is de ting fuh wunna active consideration heheheheheheheh

    All uh wunna is law-biding citizens and wunna does not get drag into court for nuffin.

    But fuh lawless ole menses like me whu does happen is dat a criminal does be able to “sight” (dat is heightened vision above layman ken), dese inconsistencies.

    De Picture.

    Effing wunna unnerstand dat de pathway into Holetown court can only hold 2 1/2 people abreast, 3 at most. Been down deah too often not to remember dese tings heheheheheheh

    So for you to stage dis picture and PHOTOSHOOT for de Barbados today it means dat two uh dem 5 peoples got to be standing, pun de higher sides of de pathway.

    which mean dis photoshop is blocking de pathway to de court. to whichin de ole man see a foot uh somebody behind dem.

    Which suggests an “unnaturalness” to de pictures or in plain speak it means a few more tings

    One is dat one of de subjects in de picture request dat de pictures be taken.

    Now Philip McWatt though good counsel is not of de mettle to ask fuh dat picture.

    Andrew to de side, as de nigger would normally be, “removed” from de white peoples, he ent central to de picture eider which confirm dat It ent he ting neider.

    Dese is white people ting and dese two racists get Barry Gale cause he white.

    So unless dem Ducks want to quack for de public back home to show dat dem has been exonerated of de blame (AND TO PAUSE UDDER PEOPLES DAT WAS PURPORTED SCAMMED NOT TO COME AND PROSECUTE DEM) it means dat the picture was photoshot by Gale, for a purpose.

    And dis article’s publication here, so soon after would suggest some overarching purpose heheheheheh.

    AND, LIKE WUNNA, De OLE MAN WOULD WONDER ABOUT THE SOURCE OF DE ARTICLE heheheheheh given the content of the article namely its “scholarly legalistic subject matter and extrapolations.”

    heheheheh

    Notwithstanding once again de ole man doffs he hat to de Honourable Blogmaster.

    De calibre of the exposees continues to rise and support de ole man exhortations to de general public to come on this site and expose de dirt.

    Like

  9. Simple Simon October 4, 2016 at 2:50 PM #

    Charges were dropped against one Christopher “Dudus” Hawkesworth too, and looka where he now.

    Like

  10. Simple Simon October 4, 2016 at 3:18 PM #

    Maybe a “higher power” has some interest. We will have to wait and see.

    Like

  11. Simple Simon October 4, 2016 at 3:30 PM #

    @Hal Austin October 4, 2016 at 9:26 AM # “When is this Guyana-born DPP going to retire?”

    Dear Hal: Were you not also at some time a “stranger dwelling in a strange land?”

    Like

  12. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 4, 2016 at 3:42 PM #

    @ Simple Simon

    My lady, my lady, my lady.

    I do not “know” the character. Am not in such circles of high society read I is a commoner but it seems like if readers have “skirted?” this matter.

    If you go back you will see that we collectively avoided the single line, rather question? that The Honourable Blogmaster posted with his picture.

    WW&C posted a single line and broke off.

    Like i said, as if a disclaimer heheheheheh, my side of the woods is po’ peeples

    But I would ask you this given that you are dropping single lines to, contrary to you normal extensive writings, should the pattern of effusive commentary surrounding lil Rick Rick’s passing and an absence, rather single lines or commentary on this man, make this more interesting?

    Like

  13. Pachamama October 4, 2016 at 5:22 PM #

    @ David

    The DPP could be 62 or 26, it will make no difference.

    These people, even after death, have other people who think like them, do exactly like they would have done.

    Do you really think anybody around hey will be any different to the people who did these jobs 300 years ago.

    Gine me a break!

    Like

  14. David October 4, 2016 at 5:25 PM #

    @Pacha

    Cannot disagree with you!

    Like

  15. recoanthony October 4, 2016 at 8:43 PM #

    ah photo is worth ah 1000 words, some times ah million, sometimes ah billion, some ah tril………………………..lion words…………

    Like

  16. Simple Simon October 4, 2016 at 9:23 PM #

    @Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right – INRI October 4, 2016 at 3:42 PM “should the pattern of effusive commentary surrounding lil Rick Rick’s passing and an absence, rather single lines or commentary on this man, make this more interesting?”

    Much more interesting.

    Alas nobody wants to offend a drug dealer.

    Alas nobody want to offend the United States.

    Because Ii you do how then will your madams get to go shopping in Miami. And if ya woman can’t shop in Miami ya life ain’t worth living.

    Simple Simon has never liked shopping. I have always wondered what is it that people get out of shopping.

    Simple Simon has never used drugs. I have always wondered what is it that people get out of drug use.

    Like

  17. Simple Simon October 4, 2016 at 9:33 PM #

    @Gabriel October 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM “A retired bishop summoned him to train him how to read a lesson at church.He stiffed the bishop,refused to turn up and changed Anglican churches.”

    More likely than not the retired Bishop was being a prick. Summoning a grown man. Well I never heard such nonsense before. Reading a lesson ain’t that hard. i started reading lessons in Anglican churches when I was still a child.

    IT IS NOT A COMPLEX TASK.

    It is real, real easy. It is not a task that would require a Bishop to summon and train an adult or a child.

    As I said I have been doing it with NO training since I was a child.

    Of course no Bishop would dare to summon the Simple Simon. if the Bishop wants to see me he knows where I live.

    But so many men are such pompous asses.

    Like

  18. racehrse October 4, 2016 at 11:27 PM #

    The only thing he’s punished is a golf ball at Barbados Golf Club!

    Like

  19. Tudor October 5, 2016 at 6:51 AM #

    I must confess that i was quite perplexed when i read the read in the newspaper, you mean that not one charge was good enough in Law for the case to be heard and possible conviction ? strange that only poses the question how come? there must be a bunch of poppets in the Dept.

    I am aware of situations regarding the DPP where his actions have been not what one would have expected of someone in his position. maybe the CJ should have a look at this matter, then again…………….

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Bush Tea October 5, 2016 at 7:10 AM #

    @ Tudor
    “….maybe the CJ should have a look at this matter, then again…………….”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Continuing your line of thought…
    …maybe the PM should have a look at some matters related to the CJ… then again, maybe someone should have a look at many matters related to the PM.

    Like

  21. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 5, 2016 at 7:18 AM #

    @ Bush Tea

    We the people are soon going to have a look into the many matters related to the Prime Minister.

    The longest Day has a night

    Like

  22. Nostradamus October 5, 2016 at 8:09 AM #

    The press report says “Director of Public Prosecutions Charles Leacock QC, discontinued the matter.”

    Just like that? No explanation? None was reported in the press. Was restitution made or did theft and stealing accusers Jean Delangis of 411 St Peter’s Bay, Road View, St Peter and Robert Richardson of 10 Forest Hills, Royal Westmoreland, St James decide not to proceed with their complaint. Were local authorities used, abused, mislead and duped into believing that the crime of theft/stealing had been committed?

    Like

  23. abajanhowe October 5, 2016 at 9:19 AM #

    Why are we talking here about our learned DPP and our Froon? Don’t they have children to feed and lifestyles to lead? Money talks and bull…. walk. Lifestyles has to be maintained and the best way they are doing it is via. the bosom friends and the bribe money.

    Gibson is powerless and not capable of going it alone so we lose again,

    Do we really expect anyone will sanction Leacock? No way.

    Like

  24. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM #

    De Ole Man tired uh de lotta long effing talk

    For de Disaster Emergency management peepe who getting paid to do alot uh scvunt every 26th of de efffing munt here is what a simple animation pertinent to 20 effing 16 should look like

    Instead of paying wunna friends money to print all dem brochures and gettig kickbacks fuh wunna scvunt

    Like

  25. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 5, 2016 at 10:49 AM #

    sorry, wrong blog

    Like

  26. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 5, 2016 at 11:40 AM #

    @ Nostradamus, ABajanHowe and Simple Simon

    A few questions for you.

    The US government sought the extradition of the 3 and “failed”?

    How is that possible?

    Are the contents of this court case sealed?

    Who is their lawyer? Ralph Thorne??

    Was Thorne the lawyer for each of the 3?

    Like

  27. Georgie Porgie October 5, 2016 at 11:51 AM #

    LOT OF LONG TALK BY THE BU RUM SHOP KNOW IT ALLS…………….BUT NUTTIN ELSE
    CARRY ON THE LONG TALK CHILDRUN

    Like

  28. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 12:01 PM #

    Piece…the DEA came up with a bogus plan to extradite the 3, the case had already been thrown out ipof a federal district court in Washington if I remember correctly from the papers in the US,., the judge had warned the governmen not to bring that case back in his coutroom and told them to release the Guyanese guy they kidnapped in Trinidad, because the case was bggus.

    Up comes the as*hole for a DPP in Barbados with the clown for an AG Nitwit Jackass…knowing the case was thrown out…butbeing the slaves that they are, still arresting Hawkesworth and the other 2 dudes and imprisoning them illegally in Barbados.

    Hawkesworth sued the US government for their slickness and they had reached a settlement, he was supposed to do his thing with attorneys re the money the same day he was killed…his estate will receive the funds…we now have to wait and see who was really behind his execution…for what it’s worth, although I love to beat up on the US…I dont think they had anything to do with it, this seems to be closer to home.

    Like

  29. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 12:03 PM #

    “the judge had warned the governmen not to bring that case back in his coutroom and told them to release the Guyanese guy they kidnapped in Trinidad, because the case was BOGUS.”

    So with all the rumors and lies being spread out there, ya gotta wait and hear the names involved in that murder.

    Like

  30. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 5, 2016 at 12:46 PM #

    @ WW&C

    I see.

    I know that I should let the internet be my friend but …..lol

    Were there enough details to speak to

    (a) if in fact there was a shipment, notwithstanding the trumped up charges?

    (b) if in fact the shipment was intercepted? that is to say, even if they had no case against the parties, if a consignment was lost, then it might seem that, depending on the size of the shipment, there was still a matter of “account reconciliation”

    It would seem like the amount is rather significant and that parties would be discommoded by its loss. De ole man has no idea how much stuff like that is worth.

    (c) Do these 3 fellows have the wherewithal to buy the amount of product that was involved? If so then it would seem to point to an “internal reconciliation of accounts” If not, that would suggest bigger fish with a “who was it for” question?

    (d) Was the fellow who got killed a “high flyer”? One can only speculate on these things that if you are involved in a situation where by your own “lifestyle advocacy” (see the rings on the wif’s fingers?) that if you are at the centre of a significant loss of income for a large enough shipment and your lifestyle continues to be fancy, should you not make “restitution” while living large there is going to be a problem!!

    (e) Who are the other “co accused”? Are they living “large” as well?

    (f) Just saw that thing about 2 years in maximum security. hmmmmmmm!

    Look at the effort we spend to grow/manufacture, process, distribute and safeguard drugs, illegal arms, dishonest activities and the works nuh WW&C

    It makes you wonder why we cant put that same energy into the cure for cancer and other diseases, poverty, war, famine etc.

    We are efficient in the delivery of death yet deficient at anything that would nurture meaningful life.

    I wonder what my Dr. GP might prescribe for that malady for poor ole me champion of long talk in the rum shop??

    Like

  31. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 12:57 PM #

    Piece…I said on another blog yesterday that we dnnt know what is going on in Trumps big fat, rotten guts, he could be hiding some sickness since he refuses to release his medical reports.., and GP actually had the nerve to ask me, what could be wrong with Trump’s big, fat guts…mind you GP is the doctor, but he is asking me…lol

    Like

  32. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 1:09 PM #

    “a) if in fact there was a shipment, notwithstanding the trumped up charges?”

    As far as I can remember, there was no shipment involved, some DEA dude or snitch turned up with a suitcase of money and when Hawkesworth told him he is nio getting into any importation, he knows nothing, apparently, that is what I heard transpired and apparently the District of Columbia judge heard as well……the DEA dude gave a statement to the contrary, filled with lies…and swore that they had made plans for some shipment or other…hence the case involving the kidnapped Guyanese dude was thrown out in the US…which should have created the domino effect of all accused being released in Barbados, but as I said, a corrupt and nasty DPP who only locks up certain people on the island and a Nitwit, Jackass attorney general, and it ended up in illegally imprisoning the accuseds, lawsuit for my friends, the slick US….and someone, not the dead dude, becoming very wealthy.

    Many of those who are supposed to be doing as you are saying, as leaders, are themselves involved in the same trade…so it will not happen anytime soon.

    Like

  33. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 1:22 PM #

    And just in case ya ask Piece.., as much as he would have been within his rights to, Hawkesworth could not sue the Barbados government, shithead AG or corrupt DPP……cause they ain’t got no money….lol

    Like

  34. Exclaimer October 5, 2016 at 1:37 PM #

    Do we in Barbados have in our midst a person like Ana Garrido?

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37551765

    Like

  35. Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right - INRI October 5, 2016 at 2:06 PM #

    This is slowly starting to make sense.

    Now one sees why the DLP sought to ensure tenure of service the DPP.

    There are 4 threads running here.

    The first is DPP’s extension for services rendered and to be rendered. But he ging be retired at 62 given the change of government that is coming

    The 2nd thread is the issue of the GoB and the implementation of the Immigration & Fingerprinting scam, against the law. Adriel Nitwit and MoF Stinkliar, aided and abetted by Fumbles sought to outwit the GoUSA of several millions of US currency for this bilateral aid project.

    So, in order to appear as collaborators, poor trio, albeit a verified trio in the trade, were offered up as the sacrificial lamb for the GoB/GoUSA exercise where all three DLP ministers would apply there lips simultaneously to the assholes of the DEA and suck, ergo trumped up extradition.

    The 3rd thread is “Fast laning” one’s Career. Field Service Officers, depending on (a) your duty posting and hazardous pay ammmm encounters and/or (b) your efficiency in meeting deliverables, are “fast-laned” through the ranks which ultimately lead to appointments in Washington.

    Advancements on the backs of ingrunt corrupt african and west indian read third world, low totem pole crooks, (very rarely is it big boys) guarantees that for you, certainly a cross border arrest of a small time fellow and an extradition will be a stellar commendation.

    The DEA agent and his team here in Barbados were inexperienced and overzealous. I guess that by now they will have forever understood that bajans are a special breed of brass bowl from prime minister to the man on the corner, we are just one tree height away from simians read gorillas

    Hawkesworth does not appear to have “bitten” the first bait offered with the $$ from the DEA agent.

    Thread 1 & 2 were employed, with their initial “partial success”. But instead of extradition he was incarcerated.

    This suggests that there seemed to have been a more substantial target that was being sought because ****

    This would also account for the maximum security “facility” that was accorded him during his 2 year incarceration.

    Thread 4 is the most speculative of this Ludlum (heheheheheh) extrapolation. “Putting the fox among the chickens”. It is apparent from recent happenings on Friday that, while CH escaped the first pass for extradition, he was not so lucky to escape the 2nd pass.

    If (either of) the men assisting the police are (a) either of the two remaining parties to the trio and (b) that said party approached the police then that would confirm thread 4.

    CH was not seen to be a “standup guy ergo Bakers which would suggest that he was not killed for account reconciliation but because he appeared to be a potential snitch and something as circumstantial as tickets/a pending trip might have caused people to wonder.

    All this is speculation WW&C of an ole man with an active imagination fed by Ludlum.

    IUSTUM NECAR REGES IMPIOS

    Like

  36. David October 5, 2016 at 2:12 PM #

    @Nostradamus

    We will probably never know given the culture of silence and secrecy. What we can do is to continue to be advocates of our democracy and by doing so we discharge our civic duty.

    >

    Like

  37. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 2:27 PM #

    “The DEA agent and his team here in Barbados were inexperienced and overzealous. I guess that by now they will have forever understood that bajans are a special breed of brass bowl from prime minister to the man on the corner, we are just one tree height away from simians read gorillas.”

    Lol…..the story is Piece and I do not claim to know all, am sure there is much more, but that they may have been successful, my good friends the US, had they not used big foot moves in trying to slick someone else, by sending in their own people and engaging with the neanderthals/slaves in government, the DPP, AG at the time……..after that I understand it all went to shit real fast, cause according to what was said…..CH wanted to know why this dude with a yankee accent and a brief case full of money was approaching him and as a matter of fact…where the hell did he get all that money from…lol

    That cock up is what ended up costing my bosom buddies and good friends the US, a lawsuit..I bet, just like you, they have learned their listen after deaing with the local “intelligentsia”. …and should have gone with the original plan, instead of trying their slick moves on a genuine person….I am told it really, really cost them.

    I dont, but I bet my very close, good friends the US…knows what all that means…cause I heard the person who got slicked by myvery close cousins the US….just cannot stop laughing their ass off…lol

    Like

  38. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 6:27 PM #

    “Businessman Francisco Correa is alleged to have been the ringleader who handed out bribes in exchange for contracts.”

    Exclaimer…isnt that what the little small time, petty pothound in Barbados Bizzy “give me” Williams says he does to the politicians of both political parties…someone needs to tell that welfare rat that in the real world, with real business people, criminals who do that go to prison for that type of bottomfeeding corruption…

    ………it’s only the backward people and slaves in parliament would see nothing wrong with such criminal acts.

    Like

  39. Anonymouse - TheGazer October 5, 2016 at 8:16 PM #

    PUDRYR @ 2:06
    Here is a conspiracy theory for ya….

    I am wondering if you did not over-analyze the CH situation. In addition to a number of secret prisons around the world, the US has a number of “wink and nod” relationship/agreement with other governments. Whilst he could have escaped extradition, it is quite possible he was incarceration was based on nothing more than a word, a wink and a nod from the US embassy..

    Like

  40. Gabriel October 5, 2016 at 8:24 PM #

    WW&C
    I seem to recall Hal Gollop represented one of the three accused persons and Gollop was strenuous in his objection to the DPP Barbados holding a brief of a foreign power namely the USA.Gollop was proved right because the stupid ignoramus of a guyanese had to withdraw.That man is nothing but a two bit chocksutter.He has no moral compass.Johnny described him to a T…a blinking canecutter from bookers guyana.

    Like

  41. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 9:03 PM #

    Gabriel…the US should make both the DPP Leacock and Adriel Nitwit reimburse them for at least half the funds paid to Hawkesworth’s estate. ..

    …….on this one Gollop was right, there should have been no incarceration of either of those dudes, the federal judge threw out the case against the kidnapped Guyanese since 2003….if I remember correctly, at least 13 years ago, it was in the NYC newspapers and was what the US case was based on….without thst, the whole thing was proven to be bogus…there was absolutely no reason for the dudes in Barbados to still be in prison 2 years ago…none.

    But that nasty, vicious DPP…. both him and the AG were just being their natural slaves self. When you see social media giving them a hard time, it’s well deserved, that is their karma for the wicked things they do to those black people like themselves that they consider nobodies. ..those slaves are a disgrace.

    It was said over and over that the US told the Barbados government years ago that they were not pursuing the case anymore. ..and yet those dummies still violated those dude’s rights.

    Like

  42. Well Well & Consequences October 5, 2016 at 9:06 PM #

    Gabriel…the US should make both the DPP Leacock and Adriel Nitwit reimburse them for at least half the funds paid to Hawkesworth’s estate.

    And I mean every penny….I am sure my 1st cousins the US will find a way…lol

    Like

  43. Simple Simon October 5, 2016 at 9:49 PM #

    @Piece Uh De Rock Yeah Right – INRI October 5, 2016 at 11:40 AM “The US government sought the extradition of the 3 and “failed”?”

    USG Failed?

    Unlikely.

    What is more likely is that in order to avoid being extradited to the USA, Christopher Hawkesworth sang like a canary to the USG, hence the USG had no need to pursue an extradition case, because they could use the Hawkesworth info to go after much bigger (Columbian) fish.

    And once they had the info from little Chrissie, he was no longer of interest or of use to them. So the backed off/Withdrew the extradition request.

    But once you have sang on the big boys they will send their executioners to look for you.

    THINK, THINK, THINK Why was lil’ Chrissie driving a hired car instead of his own posh vehicle. To try to be invisible maybe.

    He knew that he had talked. Therefore he had to know that his life was going to end soon.

    Like

  44. Simple Simon October 5, 2016 at 9:54 PM #

    It is a great pity that in his middle years he had become a man of predictable habits.

    And was doing the middle aged dad thing of driving the kids to school. Leaving home on the same time every day.

    Bushie cusses the ZR’s.

    But Chris would have lived a little longer if he had let the ZR’s take the children to school.

    Like

  45. Bush Tea October 6, 2016 at 12:15 AM #

    @ Simple
    When did you hear Bushie cuss ZR’s?
    Wuh dem is Bushie’s own boys….
    If Bushie could not be a bushman …. ‘ZR driver’ would be high on the list…🙂

    Not because you always pon a ZR skanking to the dub, …but because ZR men got more damn sense than most bout here…
    You don’t see that those fellow make money with bus fares LEGISLATED at a pittance?
    You don’t see that the whole weight of the police can’t kill them off…
    You don’t see that no matter the taxes charged, bribes demanded for licenses, police harassment, cost of spares, numbers allowed on each route…… Those fellows thrive…

    …besides, who got the most women in Barbados? …not ZR men?

    Shiite yuh! if Bushie don’t get back the whacker soon he may as well check wid Lashes fuh a ZR license and do a ting….. a little $5000 bribe can’t kill a bushman….
    Umm is still $5k right…?
    LOl
    ha ha ha

    Like

  46. Well Well & Consequences October 6, 2016 at 5:48 AM #

    Simple…Wrong…..no use speculating when there are facts available.

    Hawkesworth had no need to sing, they had no evidence on him, he was born bajan, never deported from the US, not that it matters since US cutizens at this time would love to be deported to a country more peaceful….

    …….Hawkesworth was NEVER in US custody to sing anything….and he sure as hell would never have sang anything to the authorities in Barbados since many themselves are involved in illegal activities and you cannot be sure which ones…..hom and Rommell Marshall were thisclose.

    Who bajans must be very careful of at this time, because they owe a pound of flesh are…, DPP Leacock and dumbass Adriel Nitwit Jackass, neither should ever hold public office again kn the island….

    …….Hawkesworth had no choice but to change Gollop as his lawyer later in that cockup…..remember wink, wink, nod, nod…….,.Gollop should never be affilliated with any government business again….I will tell you why.

    The wink, wink, nod, nod that a poster talked about which translates to violating citizen’s rights eg….illegally incarcerating those 3 dudes…..

    OR

    Fingerprinting citizens entering and leaving the island that the AG, Gollop and DPP Leacock are also a part of with dummy Fruendel etc also involved…inexplicably and stealthily violating their people’s rights because they owe a pound of flesh….they all need to be out of public office….and possibky in prison.

    And in the interim, watched very closely by David Commissiong.

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/87745/glover-enlightens-students

    Now here is a dude deep within the international human rights scene.

    Like

  47. Well Well & Consequences October 6, 2016 at 5:51 AM #

    In case it is mistranslated.

    Hawkesworth and Rommell Marshall were thisclose.

    Like

  48. Well Well & Consequences October 6, 2016 at 5:56 AM #

    Peter Harris and Rommell Marshall and David Simmons and Jerome Walcott and Mia Mottley and Dumbville Inniss and DPP Leacock and….a whole slew of questionable politicians are also thisclose….do you see him being locked up or made to sing.

    Like

  49. Well Well & Consequences October 6, 2016 at 6:31 AM #

    http://ow.ly/zce7304UB9Q

    This is what the US been hiding for over 100 years, their drugged up and drug dealing white majority.

    They love to focus only on the black minorities as drug users and dealers, but ya seeing this more and more on the streets of the US….they still have not started exposing and locking up their white drug dealers who number in the millions.

    Ya can hide and buy land……

    Like

  50. Hal Austin October 6, 2016 at 6:48 AM #

    In a proper open democracy, the Guyana-born DPP would be compelled to explain the reasoning for dropping cases. As I have said before, he has no right to block cases that rightly should go before a jury. Now is a good time to bring forward his retirement.
    There is also a potential economic crime angle: in an economy that is seriously under-performing, it is common economic knowledge that there will be an outflow of cash.
    Since this is unlikely to be legitimately through banks, or lots of gold, the obvious way is by cash. A million US dollars in denominations of US$100 can fit in the average brief case.
    One wonders how often this trick is used. The best way to avoid this is by banning the use of the Greenback as legal tender in Barbados.
    People with US money should have to exchange them at legally recognised bureaus de change, banks or cambios.
    Allowing people to use the Greenback as an alternative currency is a massive gap in our economic security.

    Like

  51. pieceuhderockyeahright October 6, 2016 at 9:26 AM #

    @ Well Well and Consequences

    “How shall we know this Jesus the Christ?”

    “Did you not see him in the temples while he preached daily”

    “Yes we did but he is a comely man who looks like any other man among our population…”

    “I shall Mark the Christ with a kiss…”

    Imagine that Sunday while you are among 200 people I enter your church walk up to you and embrace you and kiss you on both cheeks what will the DLP acolytes who know piece of the rock think of you?

    Even when you push me away, I have “marked” you and those people who are in the back of the church do not hear you cuss me when you push my presumptuous as* away and tell me what you will do to me if I ever do that again.

    You must understand what we do to create specific outcomes.

    By putting Hawkesworth in maximum security that was a de facto death penalty for the “observers in the back of the church”

    The seed sown was “an impression”

    Let the ole man tell you the more serious implications for this matter and why the GoUSA will forever dog shit the governments of the Caribbean particularly the government of Barbados.

    You said it in a convoluted way in your post of 5.56 am earlier today.

    Every single drug dealer in Barbados is know to the GoUSA, sorry every single DrugLord. And their associates at the higher echelons of the country. The bank accounts the wire transfers the intermediaries the proxies all.

    This fingerprints fiasco is the second time that two successive governments have effed up this matrix and satellite dragnet network that the US is pursuing globally.

    Finally the embassy understands that after all these iterations that, between the ass$&olesthat are the Chief Immigration officers, the thieves and charlatans that are immigration officers, the crooks and drug dealers who are the buddies of the ministers, that it is a waste foopism to even try to collaborate with us or share intelligence with our officials.

    Between ineptitude and corruption, they have learn that they are putting the lives of US citizens at risk and now more than ever before are determined to employ Barrow s philosophy of “friends of all, satellites of none”

    Read, “we going do this differently” we are going to track your telephone networks, without you even knowing, see where your cars are going, monitor your money transfers AND WHEN WE ARE READY, BRING STOLID CASES AGAINST YOU IN THE USA.

    Keep expanding you empire wherever you want to outside the USA but once you come into our domain, it is then we will bring you down!

    CH might not have talked but that “kiss” marked him, it is called playing chess off the tables, and this is war between the two sides of those who are criminals all the time and those who are criminals, most of the time.

    We are just collateral damage like those five buildings next to the convoy that Russia took out in Aleppo

    Like

  52. Well Well & Consequences October 6, 2016 at 9:58 AM #

    And that is the long and short of it Piece.

    Mind you, I do not mind the US protecting itself or its citizens….I have enough grands born there so respect is due. …it’s when the US tries to collude with the nincompoops…the ACs pimps favorite word….in parliament and in the system and when they are massive cockups like with the Hawkesworth humdinger…the US has only it’s self to blame when they have to pay out millions in a lawsuit.

    That matter could have been handled differently from 1999….

    Like

  53. Hal Austin October 6, 2016 at 2:39 PM #

    By the way, when is police officer Gittens going to come before th3 courts?

    Like

  54. Nostradamus October 7, 2016 at 11:31 AM #

    David,

    You posted photos of the formerly accused and their legal team as well as the DPP Leacock. Seems only fair that the photos of the two accusers, Jean Delangis of 411 St Peter’s Bay, Road View, St Peter and Robert Richardson of 10 Forest Hills, Royal Westmoreland, St James should also be posted with this story as they are central to it.

    If anyone has photos of these two gentlemen e mail them confidentially to David at barbadosunderground@gmail.com and he can consider whether to post.

    Like

  55. Hants October 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM #

    Like

  56. Bush Tea October 7, 2016 at 10:47 PM #

    This man is pathetic.
    It surely MUST take a complete and utter idiot ….to focus on solving a problem of shortage of money – caused by a gaping hole in his pocket – where half of his earnings are being lost…. by seeking enough ADDITIONAL money, at high cost, …. so that WITH the 50% loss, he may still have enough left to cover his needs…

    Even DOMPEY would not think like that…

    We have THREE basic problems.

    1 – 50% unaccounted losses.
    2 – Demand for water exceeds the natural sustainable limits.
    3 – BWA leadership that CANNOT execute….not even simple tasks like keeping a few damn trucks running

    Desal plants Bushie’s ass…..!!
    These are only attractive because they present opportunities for graft…. just like the damn building. So if Bajans decide to use twice as much water …yuh mean this jackass will just look to buy more and more desalt plants…?

    We need the following solutions:
    Management’s jobs must be tied to performance.
    – Specific, aggressive, ‘unaccounted loss’ targets must be met… or bye bye responsible manager and key personnel
    – Vehicle availability levels must meet or exceed industry standards ..or time for change..
    – water quality levels must meet industry standards …or else…

    …and how difficult can it be to work out a FAIR allocation for water-use across the Nation – bearing in mind the population, the reasonable needs, and the maximum available daily pumping limits?
    The BILLING system can then be configured to ensure that EACH Bajan has affordable access to his allocated quota ….AND THEN PAYS THROUGH THE NOSE FOR ANY MONTHLY EXCESS USED?

    The damn problems are not even complex – wuh this is a SMALL, FLAT island. Suppose we had mountains, earthquakes, rivers to cross, snakes, and all kinda shiite like most other places…?

    The BIG joke is that NOT A FELLA ain’t get fired….. not even the old-ass, doltish-looking, retard chairman – who also has the dubious distinction of ff’ing up the sugar industry.

    What a place…. too much damn WICKEDNESS
    “The ways of the wicked shall PERISH….” Psalms 1:6

    Liked by 1 person

  57. David November 21, 2016 at 1:52 PM #

    BU suspected as much would have occured.

     

    Image may contain: 1 person

    Like

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Jean Delangis and Robert Richardson Versus the Duecks Described as a Mistake | Barbados Underground - October 17, 2016

    […] follow up on the To DPP Charles Leacock: Why Did you Drop the Case Against the Duecks? story which BU carried and is quoted below. The Sunday Sun of October 16, 2016 on page 36A titled […]

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: