Teachers_Meeting

The Teacher’s Lot

Today’s Barbados Advocate Editorial addresses the decision by the Ministry of Education to dock teachers salaries who attended meetings called by the Unions.

The policeman’s lot, the opera composers, Gilbert and Sullivan, assure us in their production, The “Pirates of Penzance”, is “not a happy one”. Members of the Barbados Union of Teachers [BUT], after their travails in recent weeks, might wish to argue that teachers face a similar unhappy predicament. The clincher to this proposition would have come with the recent notification from officials in their parent ministry, Ministry of Education to the Secretary-Treasurers of the respective Boards of Management of those schools to which members of the BUT are attached, that the salaries of those teachers who attended, without permission, meetings of the Union convened in late April and early May, should be proportionately abated for the month of May 2016. The letter claims also that this is notification is in accordance with section 3. 3. 2. of the General Orders of Barbados. (sic).

This measure raises an intriguing point of law, one that has not been the subject matter of a local trial to our best knowledge. And, according to the BUT, it had already sought and obtained legal advice on the matter, which satisfied it that the Ministry “did not have a leg to stand on. In spite of this, we have serious reservations as to whether there will indeed be court action, given the express words of the president of the BUT, Mr Pedro Shepherd, that they were quite willing to pursue the matter up to the level of the Congress of Trade Unions and Staff associations of Barbados [CTUSAB] and the Social Partnership, although he did add that the BUT would take the matter “as far as necessary”, if the letter were not withdrawn.

That an employer legally has the right to withhold the wages of an employee for the period that the employee is not ready and willing to work is not in dispute. And while the letter, now in the public domain, referred to a part of the General Orders, a near identical provision has been enacted in paragraph 15 (1) of the Second Schedule (the Code of Conduct and Ethics), to the Public Service Act 2007 (as amended).

According to this-

Officers who are absent from duty without permission, except in the opinion of the Permanent Secretary or Head of Department the absence is due to illness or other unavoidable circumstances, are in breach of this Code, and their pay may be reduced appropriately by the Permanent Secretary or Head of Department to take account of such absence”.

This entitlement of the employer is also reinforced by case law. The BUT’s response to this is that provisions in the Constitution and the Trade Unions Act allow for the holding of these meetings although we understand that any such attendance would be permitted only if permission had been granted or unreasonably withheld in response to an application for leave to do so.

In any event, Mr Shepherd argues, at least 99 % of those attending would have been granted permission by their principals or those in charge of the school.

This appears to us to be the crux of the issue for now. Whether permission was granted or not may easily be established on the evidence. So long as it was granted, there should be no abatement of salaries. The official letter concedes as much.

Awe envisage a further dispute, however, in respect of the assessment of the proportionate abatement where this is justified. Does a teacher’s salary accrue by the minute, the hour or by the day? What if he or she attends school for the greater part of the day, not having been previously warned that part performance would be unacceptable.

Tags: , , ,

9 Comments on “The Teacher’s Lot”

  1. David May 28, 2016 at 8:07 AM #

    The BUT appears to be happy with both student and teacher being disciplined in the Ellerslie matter. We will have to wait to see if the docking of pay creates another dispute between them and the MoE.

    Like

  2. ac May 28, 2016 at 11:59 AM #

    The commotion casued on account of both Unions intervention before due process was embarrassing to say the least
    The shoot first and ask questions answers after is now any ongoing theme with in Union leadership that will erode and chip away at the public confidence in the Union
    Most notably is Mary utterances of vindicated
    other than causing unnecessary mayhem and chaos regarding the issue .one wonders how she arrives at such a conclusion when her intial response was to have the pupil explelled forthwith with out due process while her voice on the teachers role was muted.

    Like

  3. Observing May 28, 2016 at 3:53 PM #

    The BSTU and the BUT have done nothing to significantly advance the overall cause of teachers and the teaching profession in the last 3-5 (or more) years.

    This at a time when it is needed most and when anti-teacher and anti-social forces are most strong. This is where their fight should have been rather than in pockets of ego-driven membership-seeking point-proving battles.

    Just observing

    Like

  4. David May 28, 2016 at 3:56 PM #

    @Observing

    Fighting words.

    Do you agree with the docking of teacher’s pay?

    Like

  5. David May 28, 2016 at 4:08 PM #

    This is the outcome of billions spent on education.

    Like

  6. Ping Pong May 28, 2016 at 4:40 PM #

    Observing

    what is this “overall cause of teachers and the teaching (ahem) profession”?

    Like

  7. Observing May 28, 2016 at 5:00 PM #

    @David
    Fighting words but true words. The docking was legal. Unfortunate, but legal. Mr. Shepherd and the BUT have to take some (most) of the blame.

    btw, please take down that crap of an excuse of a video. Tasteless pointless useless. Messr Browne should be sent to Crop Over jail.

    @Ping Pong
    Teachers have been regulated to “just” teachers and their previous respect, authority and critical role they played in growth of this country is being whittled away (many teachers and educational leaders are to blame for this by the way). This contributes to many of the problems they currently face.

    Teachers’ unions should have played a more critical role in the education, mobilisation, promotion and development of their members while advocating for greater influence and contribution to developments and decisions affecting education.

    Succinctly put, the cause could be this…”to rightfully reposition teaching and teachers as critical planks of our national and social development while advocating for high standards and professional development inside the (ahem) profession as well as the highest respect outside of it.

    Just observing

    Like

  8. David May 28, 2016 at 5:10 PM #

    @Observing

    Make no mistake, the vid is very important for all of us, especially the teachers.

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: