naked_depature

Has Naked Departure Crossed the Line?

Veronica_Cutting

Veronica Cutting

BU and many Barbadians are familiar with the website called Naked Departure run by Veronica S. Cutting. Our question: has Naked Departure crossed the line?

There is no doubt Cutting’s website has caused Barbadians to pay attention, mainly because of a high salacious content. The BU household has been quietly observing the rise of Naked Departure and we have resisted, until now, publicly commenting on the website. There is the popular saying to whom much is given much is expected. Given the explosion of the social media it has provided ordinary citizens with the platform to promulgate opinions that can be read by untold numbers across the globe in just seconds. BU do what we do because we love Barbados and although we will get our keyboards dirty from time to time, we try our level best to minimize collateral damage to the innocent. For example, when we have to call names we are usually sure we have gotten it right. In the odd case we have gotten it wrong we were quick to retrieve the situation and extend an apology. This approach has worked well for us for the last 9 years and is reflected in the quality of participation on the blog.

Although some stories posted on Naked Departure are true we are aware that many are not. The policy of Naked Departure appears to be one of posting all messages and videos received and deal with the fallout when it comes.  The BU household believes Sherri and Naked Departure have a lot in common. One common factor is that from behind our dashboards we see and smell the stench that exist away from the nostrils of an unsuspecting public. And it makes us so damn angry that we are driven to want to do something to make a difference. Perhaps where our philosophy and approach differ  is that the BU household understands social media tools must not be used to intentionally harm the innocent.

To answer the question posed above: has Ms Sherri Cutting gone too far? We respectfully say that she has.

Let us constructively review a few recent postings on Naked Departure to build a case.

“Kaneisha Taylor’s Mother, Kerryann, is a Whore” photo of a child under the age of 18, which, without the consent of both parents, is illegal in most countries.

“ADRIEL BRATHWAITE, a Banker is turning Windmill Hot Sauce into Cocaine in Canada, USA, UK”. If someone is manufacturing cocaine out of hot sauce in Canada and the USA, it is outside of Adriel’s jurisdiction. Instead of tipping off the people who are alleged to be are carrying out this criminal enterprise, Sherri ought to have reported her concerns to the relevant law enforcement authorities in the USA and Canada.

“Carl Moore of Nation News Barbados vs. The Naked Truth”. Sherri and Naked Departure describes the Nation News as, “the bordello of a cesspool”. Sherri shares what constitutes truth in defamation, “The TRUTH CANNOT BE DISPROVED!” Surely what must be considered is that the truth needs to be proved first.

“The Abed’s Made Their Money from Slavery”. Sherri alleges that they employed university students at below minimum wage to work on their various projects. There is no supporting documentation for the allegation that Abed paid below minimum wages and surely the concept of no concept of  “slavery” does not apply in this case.

It is not the motive of BU to be malicious in our critique of Naked Departure. However, we believe Sherri and crew should appreciate that our feedback is heartfelt.  Respect and integrity must be earned based on actions and behaviours displayed over time.  Blindly damaging the reputations of innocent people is not fair. There is still the opportunity for Naked Departure, Barbados Underground and other social media sites to highlight and report injustices and provide a voice for those who otherwise would have none.

To whom much is given much is expected.

Sherri, please hear our cry!

Tags: , , ,

212 Comments on “Has Naked Departure Crossed the Line?”

  1. ac February 25, 2016 at 9:10 PM #

    A lot of ND supporters tout the vantage point one of giving those who believe that they were victimised by people in high echeleon or the lower segments of this society giving them a right of privilege to degrade by which ever method or avenue available to be judge jury and executioner of the alleged prepetrator fate ……which in fact can be the equivalence of a life sentence of daily condemnation upon the prepretator !associates and family members …….members which might also include those percious children that ND talks of having rights and protection from the immoral and unjustifiable torture of society.However now caught in the cross hairs and caught in the network of collateral damage would be the children who lives would be caught up in a lifetime of snares and daily torture of society cruel taunts and stares and idle gossip which the children would not be able to avoid or handle but would have no choice but to succumbed to cruel jokes… an innoncence which is now caught up in suspicion and depression
    Where do we go from here? Yes those are the small and unheard voices ND speaks of but some how somewhere still gets lost in a malaise of gossip and innuendo channeled by real or unreal motives but sadly innocent voices unrepresented and unable to defend themselves

    Like

  2. Well Well & Consequences February 25, 2016 at 10:10 PM #

    AC…shut your idiocy, what is going on between Tenelle and Sherri is between 2 US citizens, of course being a field slave you would want to jump right in and be used…not all black people are as dumb as you…lol

    Mind your goddamn business.

    Like

  3. Well Well & Consequences February 26, 2016 at 5:44 AM #

    Some positive news for a change…this should make AC miserable all day again today.😅

    Well Well & Consequences February 26, 2016 at 5:41 AM #

    Lol….Something very nice for Clico policyholders to wake up to this morning.

    “LEROY PARRIS has failed to persuade the court to unfreeze the $3.3 million at the centre of a legal battle and the Chief Justice has said the insurance company Parris once headed is entitled to the money.

    In another twist in the legal wrangling since the collapse of the regional conglomerate Clico International Life Insurance (CIL), Chief Justice Sir Marston Gibson, sitting in the High Court on Monday dismissed Parris’ attempt to regain control of the money in a fixed deposit account at Scotiabank.

    “The Bank of Nova Scotia is directed, until the further order of the court, to maintain the $4 500 000 in term deposit . . . held in the name Branlee Consulting Services Inc,” the Chief Justice stated.

    In addition, the court removed the estate of David Thompson from the list of defendants against whom the action had been brought. In an earlier application Justice William Chandler had granted the judicial managers of CLICO the freezing injunction against the account in the name of Parris and his Branlee company.”

    See more at: http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/78288/parris-loses#sthash.lxqGhJKH.dpuf

    Like

  4. ac February 26, 2016 at 1:58 PM #

    To sum it all up ND instead of taking the high road has chosen to used a road littered with pot holes where the innocent and guilty would eventually be cast in..what about the children are they too deserving of such a fate?

    Like

  5. Well Well & Consequences February 26, 2016 at 2:58 PM #

    AC…now that the abuse by children has been exposed by ND and other mediums, I believe it is now up to the Attorney General, Adriel Brathwaite the DPP, the police, parents, various organizations etc who are responsible should put systems in place to lock up the culprits and protect the children, that is the responsibilty of all the above people…they used to pretend they did not know children were being victimized and young girls raped and pimped out before, they cannot pretend anymore.

    All eyes and focus need to be on the many, many problems in Barbados and seeking solutions for same.

    Like

  6. Well Well & Consequences February 26, 2016 at 2:59 PM #

    *abuse of children.

    Like

  7. Colonel Buggy February 26, 2016 at 9:42 PM #

    Its a damn good thing that ND was not around 2000 years ago when Christ walked this earth, otherwise Christianity would never have made it off the ground.
    Christians are supposed to be loving , forgiving, non-judgemental , ever ready to turn the other cheek, and to leave everything in the hands of God. Yet recently we saw a Churchgoer, if not a Christian, praying and emptying his/her/their belly out to ND about the supposedly evil doings of a Parish Priest.
    I have always maintain that one of the most ardent churchgoers, is the Devil himself.

    Like

  8. Violet C Beckles March 2, 2016 at 9:47 AM #

    http://nakeddeparture.com/2016/02/29/barbados-50-years-masonic-supreme-court-land-property-corruption/

    Well here is some proof that land fraud is real in Barbados, and why people must be removed, Lawyers and Judges for all who Chuse to look the other way,

    Like

  9. ac March 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM #

    since BU has given more legs to ND by highlighting its service / disservice to the island I pooped in recently to see what the fuss was all about and was shocked to read the headlines on ND which painted a broad brush of BARBADIANS as pedophiles ! wickers ! bullers ! lies and all things immoral
    AS a Barbadian I hate to be cast into such a category of immorality and slanderous behavior which gives the reader especially those not living on the island an overall view with a nudging and jarring effect that the population of 275thousand people as stated in the Headlines named Barbadians are driven by actions of immoral behavior as described by contents of ND articles which in fact can produce long term negative implications and which can hurt the reputation of not one but many good and outstanding citizens on the island,
    The fact that ND can be so bold and have no regard for such negative implication of all Barbadians and their reputation many of whom who are innocent and would most likely be cast into a sea of degradation and immorality through no fault of their and having a need to defend oneself from such accusations because of ridicule and misread interpretations!should be enough to give cause for a class action law suit to be brought against ND in lite of the Fact that ND might have intentionally use salacious content to profit and expand readership without thought or concern of hurting or defaming the entire nation of BARBADIAN society
    It is also note worthy that the headlines on ND departure implies BARBADIANS

    Like

  10. ac March 4, 2016 at 8:39 PM #

    Headline Naked Departure

    BARBADIANS Having Sex with Dogs, Eating Feces, Drinking Sperm, Anal Sex, Old Men

    ask yourself as a Barbadian do you fit into such a cesspool of degradation and immoral cesspool ?
    Then if not stand up for your Rights and not allow Naked DEPARTURE on a social media website to take the good name of your nationality and personnel reputation to be drowned into a salacious cesspool of misinterpretation and misrepresentation for PROFITABILITY
    BE BOLD and take whatever legal steps to STOP IT NOW

    Like

  11. TheGazer March 4, 2016 at 10:16 PM #

    @ac
    Behave yourself and you will not make it to ND.
    It’s a website with anonymous postings. There is a lot of sensationalism, but that is to attract readers. It is the net. I think it is good to put some people on blast; let them know the world is not blind and they need to clean themselves up.

    Like

  12. Colonel Buggy March 4, 2016 at 10:39 PM #

    ac March 4, 2016 at 8:39 PM
    As usual we will sit back and have a good laugh at others who are being destroyed by ND. Until it is our turn, then we want to move heaven and earth o stop her.

    Like

  13. ac March 4, 2016 at 11:13 PM #

    Well as a BARBADIAN I consider myself as a citizen being mentioned by nationality in the above salacious headline naming “barbadians which gives me serious cause to look further into what legal actions can be taken against Naked departure as protective methods in safeguarding the reputation individually or collectively as a National of Barbados from slander due to salacious articles released on Naked departure

    one must also take into consideration the seriousness of these articles and the negative consequences especially when personnel names are obsolete or avoided and replaced with generalizations which taints a national! a nation and a nationality and indict and indicates with suspicious allegations or accusations without proof and unsubstantiated claims

    Like

  14. ac March 4, 2016 at 11:52 PM #

    Blogging, Content and the Courts – the Ongoing Saga

    Interesting

    You can publish anything you want online, with the best of intentions, but don’t fool yourself into thinking everyone will be OK with that. Take the example of Oregon blogger Crystal Cox, who runs several blogs including obsidianfinancesucks.com, where she has been on the case of the investment firm’s CEO for close to a year. Last January said CEO sued Cox for $10 million for defamation.
    As reported in Seattle Weekly Blogs “Law and Courts”

    Representing herself in court, Cox had argued that her writing was a mixture of facts, commentary and opinion (like a million other blogs on the web) and moved to have the case dismissed. Dismissed it wasn’t, however, and after throwing out all but one of the blog posts cited by Obsidian Financial, the judge ruled that this single post was indeed defamatory because it was presented, essentially, as more factual in tone than her other posts, and therefore a reasonable person could conclude it was factual.
    So now you can be judged as a journalist – for writing “more factual in tone” blog posts – but you can at the same time be sued if, indeed, that post is not factual, constituting defamation. But there’s more..
    Now here’s where the case gets more important: Cox argued in court that the reason her post was more factual was because she had an inside source that was leaking her information. And since Oregon is one of 40 U.S. states including Washington with media shield laws, Cox refused to divulge who her source was.
    But without revealing her source Cox couldn’t prove that the statements she’d made in her post were true and therefore not defamation, or attribute them to her source and transfer the liability.
    Oy. Well at least the judge lowered the judgment, from $10 million…to only $2.5 million.
    As has been pointed out by many pundits lately, “We are all becoming media companies,” and we may be seen as such through the eyes of judges, lawyers and jury members going forward. But will we have the protections that career journalists have had in the past?

    Like

  15. ac March 5, 2016 at 10:25 AM #

    Glad to hear that the AG has issued full warning on websites like Naked Departure who used pornographic literature depicting children in sexual acts

    Personnally after reading Naked Departure Headlines depicting a nation as depraved degenerates i became sickened and totally ashamed because of the sorid and tainted observations which Headlines to lead and mislead can falsely imprint in the minds of the unsuspecting reader world wide
    To those who belive that what ND is doing serves a good purpose should retrace and rethink history and how propaganda and fasle accusations have destroyed the viabilty of races and nation
    Folks what Naked Departure is not different now in her naming and shaming of an entire nation

    Like

  16. waiting March 6, 2016 at 8:13 PM #

    Colonel Buggy March 4, 2016 at 10:39 PM #
    ac March 4, 2016 at 8:39 PM
    As usual we will sit back and have a good laugh at others who are being destroyed by ND. Until it is our turn, then we want to move heaven and earth o stop her.

    True dat….We rightly condemn the loads of dishonest lawyers who muddy society’s landscape so where lawyers actions are for a community good they must be credited. The hunt by Douglas Trotman, the Attorney General and a posse of legal eagles to bring this sick ND woman to justice must be supported. Mind you she’s got accomplices who the attorneys should find and prosecute along with her if she is extradited. Long prison spells in addition to hefty fines for the hurt ND caused many innocent persons is just reward for the publisher and her accomplices.

    Like

  17. ac March 6, 2016 at 8:43 PM #

    APPLAUSE ! APLLAUSE! NAKED DEPARTURE FACEBOOK PAGE DELETED
    FACEBOOK HEARD LISTENED And responded to the cesspool of unsubstantiated allegations and removed the facebook triology from its pages

    Response ND

    BARBADOS. As was to be expected, the Naked Departure Facebook Group has been deleted from Facebook by Facebook. Facebook did not give a reason why it was deleted but we know there was a concerted effort by many to have it removed. We only seem to last six months on Facebook.
    FACEBOOK is the white man. We speak of slavery in Barbados and the corrupt politicians/police/judicial system…. We know that the white ‘elite’ in Barbados do not EVER enter the penal system. Nowhere else in the world does this occur, except Barbados. Nowhere else in the world are priests not prosecuted as pedophiles, except in Barbados. Nowhere else in the world are child pornographers not arrested, except in Barbados. Nowhere else in the world can a speaker of the house sit in parliament and be a KNOWN thief, except in Barbados. So, we bring these things to light. We are and always will be, a target.

    Naked Departure has encouraged people over the months to subscribe to its website. Luckily, most of the traffic to Naked comes from web searches and not Facebook.

    WE CAN SEE your inbox messages on Facebook but we are also banned. 30 days. No specific reasons given by Facebook. All ADMIN to the group are out-of-order for 30 days. So, talk to us HERE. Naked Departure

    Like

  18. Colonel Buggy March 7, 2016 at 11:13 PM #

    I have not time for Naked Departure, but I’ve noticed that no big hurrah was raised about ND , until it started to attack prominent politicians. Can we expect our future Republic Government to do a Turkey with any media house when it speaks out against them?

    Like

  19. ac August 21, 2016 at 9:36 PM #

    this was one of my favorite blogs on BU .this woman believed she was invincible ,,, but God does not like ugly .hopefully she would do the decent thing and cover up her overexposed nakedness before she hits the road.. guh long do woman scorned

    Like

  20. Colonel Buggy August 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM #

    This ND woman has been banned from Facebook and now WordPress, but she ain’t done yet. Last night I came across her ,with her entire blog transfered to another site.

    Like

  21. ac August 21, 2016 at 10:11 PM #

    but for how long she would soon become known as the “Gypsy” having no fix placed of abode

    Like

  22. Artax August 21, 2016 at 10:29 PM #

    ac August 21, 2016 at 9:36 PM #

    “………. but God DOES NOT LIKE UGLY……”

    The above can be interpreted as self incriminating comment, AC

    Hahahahahahahaha!!!!

    Like

  23. Bush Tea August 21, 2016 at 10:43 PM #

    LOL @ Artax
    Sound like she was complaining about being discriminated against…
    ha ha ha

    Like

  24. ac August 21, 2016 at 10:48 PM #

    Yes God took one look at her ugly booty and shut the site down. now some one says she has activated another site letting her presence known, but what for ? another waste of time

    Like

  25. Artax August 22, 2016 at 12:47 AM #

    @ Bushie

    The ACs wrote “Yes God took one look at her ugly booty and shut the site down.”

    I wonder what He would to face-book when He gaze upon AC’s mug under that weave?

    Like

  26. Violet C Beckles August 22, 2016 at 6:24 AM #

    She just moving up not moving down nor backing down from the crooks liars and scumbags hiding out in Barbados, The World is changing and the true law is going after the crooks, People want to hide the true of matters as the world around them crumble and telling us all on the government control news all is well,
    As they drink and go against their own laws,
    Dont get to happy crooks , Shes not done with you all as yet and your supporters that live of the people like vampires ,

    Like

  27. Amused August 22, 2016 at 6:48 AM #

    @Colonel Buggy. Yes, I noticed that change to another site. Another WordPress site too. My guess is that this too will be taken down by WordPress and it will not take as long or as much work this time. At first, I used to read ND, just as I used to read the “books” of Angela Cole. But, as with Angela Cole, my appetite quickly waned. I do not think that the majority of Bajans really have a taste for unsupported and evident malice, despite our national preoccupation with gossip, which is part and parcel of a small society. For the minority, I am sure ND will be missed; but I am sure that this minority will find other outlets for their unsupported malice.

    I also believe that the spectre of criminal prosecution continues to loom large. I have never been defamed by ND, but am aware that many of the alleged defamations have a criminal element to them. I am also aware that Interpol has been involved and that there is an ongoing investigation that may well lead to the extradition of this person from the USA to face criminal charges in Barbados. We will see how that goes. She has a big problem if she is dealing with Douglas (Trotman). He will not let go.

    Like

  28. ac August 22, 2016 at 8:23 AM #

    Her site was tragic. She had no qualms about labelling Barbadians as degenerates that was my real concern with her scrupulous allegations in that she used a “lumping” of the nation and when this type of information is placed across the blogsphere the perceptions are set and i as a barbadian resented being falsely accused
    Her insensitivity to those that she attacks and has opened her website for others to do so leaves an impression that she might have serious mental issues with
    associated to bad relationships and her forum gives others with a similar associations an avenue to vent and revenge

    Like

  29. Poetic Justice August 24, 2016 at 5:23 PM #

    Yes she did cross the line. I am American. I met with FBI agents within a week her site was closed. I met with them in Barbados at the US Embassy. I was not alone in my efforts. They put the order into remove her from Facebook. I have a case against her for the crimes she committed against me. Law Enforcement in the USA put the request to remove her from Word Press. I then am flilng charges in the state she lives in advices by Law Enfocement.I am going for a permanent injunction to remedy some of the charges are under a felony Class A misdemeanor in Washington state ‘Gross Misdemeanor”. The fact she was making money off ads to abuse her victims some minors is most upsetting. You can not do a little good and far far more harm.
    The time this has taken from my life to thwart a cyberbully, abuser , terrorist has been a nusciance.
    I was a victim of her tirades as she did so many countless cruel things against her victims . She can have a chance to address me in a court of law. If she fee ls the statute of limitations has ran out she better do some research because niether state one I filed in is this so and neither is the state she resides in.
    te this :I am very well aware and adverse about the statute of limitations > I had to monitor and screensave for dectetives and asked to put evidence on flash drives.

    I have spent months documenting for a case.
    I know this more than most even what states have time barred and the lengths varying from state to state.
    . I am also going to the ATTY General of California Kamilla Harris where Google, Word Press, Twitter. Facebook are and explaining how you terrorized and tortured a whole nation
    . Once, I file and am granted permanent injunction any actions after this you breathe my name or start abusing/harassing/stalking again others and myself this charges becomes upped to FELONY charges for disobeience and contempt of this.
    This is only the start of the ripple effect. . I a To think you made money off ads at the expense of your victims is there no shame in your games.
    You used the US court orders to your (sic) advantage with the most vengeful malicious intent . Anywhere you decide to have a venue, outlet to do your skullduggery of harm , havoc and hurt. I will be there to do the same time and time again and you will only make more legal evidence against yourself. I often felt paralyzed to help even myself let alone others. But I have now the wind to my sails restored . No stopping me when this happens.
    I do not need to be known as the person who was and will be one of the reasons you will be defeated from destroying people and their loved ones etc,
    Even after all you did as sick , demenented and demonic . I hope you get the help you need and that healing can happen for all those you taunted and tortured. I also hope MANDATORY you are forced to get help because otherwise you never will stop. That flowers can grow where the poisonous weeds of your wrath were planted. GOD Bless. Sad thing is your viewers egged you on and enabled you not knowing you desperately need help. I feel very sad for you and even as much hurt you have caused me I still have compassion in my heart you can not take from me and empathy for others you never had or showed.
    I cried when you mocked my documented rape and said I loved this to happen. I want you to get a chance to say this to me in a court of law when under your heading of your very Former SITE that will remain buried I will fight tooth and nail to see this happens . Move heaven and earth and go to the ends of the world and every corner of the universe to see tis happens. The fact two victories have happend has given me hope freedom of speech is not freedom to stalk, harass and cyber bully. There are more laws you broke. I was being asked by many of your victims to please do something well guess what I did and I wish even when you attacked I had not after FBI removed you waited in my own fear, dismay , shock , and sadness of being a cyber bully taget . Yes, she did cross the line. Good day.

    Like

  30. de pedantc Dribbler August 24, 2016 at 5:29 PM #

    The issue of Naked Departure’s ‘demise’ or claims of same is equal in comparative measure to the demise of Gawker. Of course Naked has not been bankrupted (yet) and thus lives to fight another day but for those who are nonaligned on ‘whether it stays or if it goes away’ there is a perspective that those who are corrupt are happy to see this Naked wrath of gossip go away.

    And if they are happy then greater society should be unhappy.

    Alas, we cannot fight evil with evil and thus the Gawkers and Nakeds of our world must be able to fight the battles under acceptable rules of engagement.

    Like

  31. Poetic Justice August 24, 2016 at 5:35 PM #

    Yes, when I met with FBI agents.US State Dept . Here at the US Embassy there is sufficeint enough grounds for request of extradiction and they told me she coild have her naturalized US citizenship revoked not only extradited but deported.
    I tried to beg her for compassion for her victims some minors Null and Void.
    I hope she gets help in truth and all this can become a fading memory for her victims you are very right AC. The more she threatens to come back and she should know two very liberal social media outlets removed her and learn freedom of speech comes first amendment laws come with a price . Blog with consideration . She breeched and violated user term agreements. There are Bajans working with FBI agents to seek extradiction they remain silent in these steps and efforts. All you who egged her own should have been encouraging her to get help yes she is a very hurt wounded soul but she does have the right to hurt others in a vindictive, malicious intent manner.
    Please read on cybercrimes , revenge porn, cyberstaking, Cyberhrarrassing etc and she has met this critertia, AC you are spot on.

    Like

  32. Poetic Justice August 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM #

    She is aware LEO requested and or ordered her removal you can not brazenly and openly continue to threaten to break the laws with regards to cyberbullying and cybercrimes.

    Like

  33. Poetic Justice August 24, 2016 at 5:39 PM #

    I mean she does not have the right to in her own hurt inflict hurt on others . End of story.

    Like

  34. Colonel Buggy August 24, 2016 at 9:57 PM #

    Equally as bad are those despicable persons among us who concoct stories to pull others down.
    ND had become a fantasy outlet for many of those described as of an alternative lifestyle.
    One day, Veronica Cutting, will experience that same guilt and sorrow as the mid 1960’s feminist Germaine Greer.

    Like

  35. ac. August 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM #

    That woman only feelings was about herself .Her vindictive nature was well exposed in her characterization of other peoples short comings making her character equally exposed with all of the same despicable actions for which he vehemently chastized and demonize a nation as wickers and bullers

    Like

  36. Poetic Justice August 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM #

    I am one of her victims. LEO put only a request for her removal and not an order from Word Press. SO , this is surreal dealing with this type of person. I was told until I bring all the flashdrives after printing out countless information District Attorney’s want for all saved not printed out but flash drives. So, upon my return to the USA this will be wrapped up. I then face the challenges of extradition on a misdemeanor class A ( they will not on misdemeanors) she faces arrest as she exits country . So then I discussed with Detectives can I file in my non resident state and hers of Washington where she is they said ‘Yes,” So she does not understand my state two years statute of limitations on these crimes to be filed and hers two years. I am getting a permanent injunction order so then if she violates after sending cease and desist she will be in contempt and after charged violating a Gross misdemeanor charge becomes a felony. So, I just have to go through a lot to stop my perpertraitor. But to stop her abusing others I will.

    Like

  37. ac August 25, 2016 at 6:10 PM #

    Poetic justice good for you ,there are also others in her circle of malice and denigration that needs to be flushed out and called to justice

    Like

  38. Poetic Justice August 25, 2016 at 10:23 PM #

    Stautue of limitations has not ran out two years and harassment laws , cyberstalking and revenge porn are serious charges detectivs told me to get an order and an injunction and the more stories she does he more charges for her. It is hard AC but look like I will be in seattle for a good month. I can not believe what a cyber stalker and harasser she is is . Cyber bully. I know there is not a judge that will condone this lunancy behavoir. Anywya, she started stalking me all over twitter and has somehow created a new website.

    Like

  39. Preciouz Cadogan August 26, 2016 at 1:31 AM #

    @Colonel Buggy, You have been eating to much dog food. Do you have two legs or four legs, talking about ND and christianity. Please take those pig feet out of your mouth and make sense from nonsense man. You love Christ more than the oppressors. The once oppressed shall become the oppressor, that’s you Colonel “Traitor” to his race Buggy.

    Like

  40. ac August 26, 2016 at 12:59 PM #

    Looking at the picture of Veronica face in the caption reminds of those pictures i saw in libray books about witches all that is missing is the broom.come to think of it her face would make the perfect Halloween mask

    Like

  41. Poetic Justice August 26, 2016 at 1:16 PM #

    I have to now travel to Seattle to stop her and press charges . She has mocked my rape, She has said I liked and loved to be raped . She has posted pictures she claims are me which is revenge porn. Which has been a nightmare.
    She has stalked, terrorized and bullied me for a year and the statute of limitations has not run out and I want all thse people who stand up for her tell me what “Good” she has done. This is an utter nightmare what kind of person can do this and another woman. She lured me to tell my rape story becasue she said the demons of barbados did this and she used to to expose Bajans as rapists and I begged her to take the story down because I was no ready to come with my story but she old told this story not to help me or other victims but to show :Barbados in a bad light” She then when I stood up to her. Said. I loved to be raped. She has done so many things to so many people and yet some see her as good I guess loyalists of the third riech who gassed my family in the Holocaust felt they had a right to because we were on Schindlers list.
    I was documented raped phsyically and emotionally raped by Sheri Veronica/ I know the feelings now to be lierally raped and figuratively/ How can anyone support her?

    Like

  42. ac August 26, 2016 at 2:19 PM #

    Her prey was the weak unsuspecting and vulnerable and poetic you fit her mould in every way.

    Like

  43. Bush Tea August 26, 2016 at 2:38 PM #

    @ ac August 26, 2016 at 2:19 PM
    Well said.
    You could be quite perceptive when you keep away from politics yuh…!!
    Perhaps you need to ‘focusBarbados’ more…. rather than focusDLP…

    Like

  44. Colonel Buggy August 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM #

    Preciouz Cadogan August 26, 2016 at 1:31 AM #
    @Colonel Buggy, You have been eating to much dog food.
    ………………………………………………………………………………………………
    Perhaps I am eating dog food, but what the feck are you drinking?

    Like

  45. Colonel Buggy August 26, 2016 at 4:51 PM #

    She can always claim refugee status in Canada, with the excuse that returning her to Barbados, may not be good for her health.

    Like

  46. ac August 26, 2016 at 5:28 PM #

    canada and barbados have a very good relationship and one would not expect for that piece of garbage to be the souring of the respect that both of these countries have for each other , in other words she would have to show immeasurable and convincing proof via medical records that she is in grave health however just maybe her mental state of mind might be the one of the better ways from which she can be saved from extradition as only a maniac would go to such great lengths to seek and devour lives

    Like

  47. Colonel Buggy August 26, 2016 at 5:46 PM #

    No doctor would be able to diagnose the type of health threat I am referring to.

    Like

  48. millertheannunaki August 26, 2016 at 6:17 PM #

    @ ac August 26, 2016 at 12:59 PM
    “Looking at the picture of Veronica face in the caption reminds of those pictures i saw in libray books about witches all that is missing is the broom.come to think of it her face would make the perfect Halloween mask..”

    ‘Those who are without sin, cast the first stone’!
    You, ac, ought to be the last person to condemn anyone who unjustifiably attacks people’s characters. We shall never forget the nasty untruthful things you have said about MAM and, previously, about OSA. The only thing missing between you and the Naked Departure witch is not a broomstick but one false weave on your ugly twisted volte-face.

    “Better keep yourself clean and bright; you are the window through which you must see the world.” ~George Bernard Shaw

    Like

  49. ac August 26, 2016 at 7:15 PM #

    sh,,t man you got some nerve to compare my political commentary to that despicable website Naked departure operated by sheri veronica who spared no favor or showed any destroying innocent peoples life why don.t you read poetic justice post before you open your stink mouth to slam me and see if the bad actions done to her by Sheri Veronica are warranted
    it is people like you who would rather find an excuse to blame the victim ,so here you jump up on your rickety hobby horse to blow your political trumpet in defiance trying to use me as a scape goat and as an example for that despicable woman’s actions
    You ought to be ashamed of yourself

    Like

  50. Colonel Buggy August 28, 2016 at 3:59 PM #

    History has a way of repeating itself.

    Like

  51. Poetic Justice August 29, 2016 at 5:10 AM #

    There she was sayig something about know statute of limitations. She has tripped up. Statute of limitations is two years where she is at. The fact , she mentions statute of limitations to suggest she thinks she is scott free and time has ran out when statute of limitations is not barred. Shows she is aware she is committing crimes the more she says the better for a case. Not that I am shocked. Because I will press charges against her. A year of being harassed , stalked and the victim of cyber crimes. She posted *ALLEGED Revenge Porn and admitted to doing so though she said she was banned for this suspended for dirty pics no the criminal term is Revenge porn the state she resides in this is a crime prosecutable and indcitable as well. Screensaving. building a case has been time consuming. It threw me for a loop to be victimized and cyber stalked, harassed and bullied but “Thank Goodness there are laws to protect victims like myself. I will go to heaven and hell and every corner of the universe to see she faces the justice she deserves for the injustices. No she can not hide out in Canada we have an agreement with Canada and once she is charged in the US she can and will be extradited here. We exradite Canadians back to Canada and Canada back to the USA. They have access to our FBI data base and we have reciprocity agreements . She can not seek amenesty because the evidence is abundant. She can however be stripped of her US NATURALIZED citizenship which comes with conditions and not only exratdited but deported. See getting her charged in the USA makes grounds for all this all the more stronger. I put up with enough of being bullied. I am INTJ personality. I am a strong soul I care about others and someone who is imhumane as she is and far far from a humanitarian gets under my skin. I was told by police and lawyers to send cease and desist steps to getting a permanent injunction seattle here I come. She has been warned the fact she has been banned twice suspended from facebook and Word Press twice. ( Two liberal sites ) only makes the case in the USA Stronger and the articles about her crossing the line which she has and the fact she is wanted for prosecution in Barbados all makes building a case against her stronger.

    Like

  52. recoanthony August 30, 2016 at 9:41 AM #

    HAD NOT FOR ND WE WOULD NOT KNOW ALOT OF THINGS, BUT SHERI DON’T LIVE HERE SO SOME ONE OR MANY IS FEEDING HER INFO THAT COULD VERY WELL BE IN THE KNOW, ANY WAY I’M HAPPY UR BACK ON LINE, CAN’T TOUCH YA

    Like

  53. Poetic Justice August 30, 2016 at 1:45 PM #

    RCW 9.61.260 Two years to file for Gross Misdemeanor and then get an injunction no contact order cease and desist who represents the victims police, DA, same police she has publically bashed will be working to get an indictment after order is in place any violation is seen as contempt of court and goes to a felony charge. You can not stalk, harass, intimdate your victims like this. Law is against this not pro cyberabuse. Barbadians can file in the state she is sending this from know statute of limitations is two years plenty of time. The Police investigate prepare case for DA she has to either take a public defender or pay a private criminal lawyer which will be costly in cases like this 20,000 US and upwards . Public defenders work on small salaries sadly and case overloaded and DA;s try cases they feel they can win here
    Cyberstalking.
    (1) A person is guilty of cyberstalking if he or she, with intent to harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass any other person, and under circumstances not constituting telephone harassment, makes an electronic communication to such other person or a third party:
    (a) Using any lewd, lascivious, indecent, or obscene words, images, or language, or suggesting the commission of any lewd or lascivious act;
    (b) Anonymously or repeatedly whether or not conversation occurs; or
    (c) Threatening to inflict injury on the person or property of the person called or any member of his or her family or household.
    (2) Cyberstalking is a gross misdemeanor, except as provided in subsection (3) of this section.
    (3) Cyberstalking is a class C felony if either of the following applies:
    (a) The perpetrator has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment, as defined in RCW 9A.46.060, with the same victim or a member of the victim’s family or household or any person specifically named in a no-contact order or no-harassment order in this or any other state; or
    (b) The perpetrator engages in the behavior prohibited under subsection (1)(c) of this section by threatening to kill the person threatened or any other person.
    (4) Any offense committed under this section may be deemed to have been committed either at the place from which the communication was made or at the place where the communication was received.
    (5) For purposes of this section, “electronic communication” means the transmission of information by wire, radio, optical cable, electromagnetic, or other similar means. “Electronic communication” includes, but is not limited to, electronic mail, internet-based communications, pager service, and electronic text messaging.
    [ 2004 c 94 § 1.]
    NOTES:
    Severability—2004 c 94: “If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.” [ 2004 c 94 § 6.]
    Effective dates—2004 c 94: “This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [March 24, 2004], except for section 3 of this act, which takes effect July 1, 2004.” [ 2004 c 94 § 7.]

    Like

  54. Poetic Justice August 30, 2016 at 1:50 PM #

    NOTES:
    Harassment: RCW 9A.36.080, chapter 10.14 RCW.

    9A.46.010
    Legislative finding.

    The legislature finds that the prevention of serious, personal harassment is an important government objective. Toward that end, this chapter is aimed at making unlawful the repeated invasions of a person’s privacy by acts and threats which show a pattern of harassment designed to coerce, intimidate, or humiliate the victim.
    The legislature further finds that the protection of such persons from harassment can be accomplished without infringing on constitutionally protected speech or activity.
    [ 1985 c 288 § 1.]

    9A.46.020
    Definition—Penalties.

    (1) A person is guilty of harassment if:
    (a) Without lawful authority, the person knowingly threatens:
    (i) To cause bodily injury immediately or in the future to the person threatened or to any other person; or
    (ii) To cause physical damage to the property of a person other than the actor; or
    (iii) To subject the person threatened or any other person to physical confinement or restraint; or
    (iv) Maliciously to do any other act which is intended to substantially harm the person threatened or another with respect to his or her physical or mental health or safety; and
    (b) The person by words or conduct places the person threatened in reasonable fear that the threat will be carried out. “Words or conduct” includes, in addition to any other form of communication or conduct, the sending of an electronic communication.
    (2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, a person who harasses another is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
    (b) A person who harasses another is guilty of a class C felony if any of the following apply: (i) The person has previously been convicted in this or any other state of any crime of harassment, as defined in RCW 9A.46.060, of the same victim or members of the victim’s family or household or any person specifically named in a no-contact or no-harassment order; (ii) the person harasses another person under subsection (1)(a)(i) of this section by threatening to kill the person threatened or any other person; (iii) the person harasses a criminal justice participant who is performing his or her official duties at the time the threat is made; or (iv) the person harasses a criminal justice participant because of an action taken or decision made by the criminal justice participant during the performance of his or her official duties. For the purposes of (b)(iii) and (iv) of this subsection, the fear from the threat must be a fear that a reasonable criminal justice participant would have under all the circumstances. Threatening words do not constitute harassment if it is apparent to the criminal justice participant that the person does not have the present and future ability to carry out the threat.
    (3) Any criminal justice participant who is a target for threats or harassment prohibited under subsection (2)(b)(iii) or (iv) of this section, and any family members residing with him or her, shall be eligible for the address confidentiality program created under RCW 40.24.030.
    (4) For purposes of this section, a criminal justice participant includes any (a) federal, state, or local law enforcement agency employee; (b) federal, state, or local prosecuting attorney or deputy prosecuting attorney; (c) staff member of any adult corrections institution or local adult detention facility; (d) staff member of any juvenile corrections institution or local juvenile detention facility; (e) community corrections officer, probation, or parole officer; (f) member of the indeterminate sentence review board; (g) advocate from a crime victim/witness program; or (h) defense attorney.
    (5) The penalties provided in this section for harassment do not preclude the victim from seeking any other remedy otherwise available under law.
    [ 2011 c 64 § 1; 2003 c 53 § 69; 1999 c 27 § 2; 1997 c 105 § 1; 1992 c 186 § 2; 1985 c 288 § 2.]
    NOTES:
    Intent—Effective date—2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.
    Intent—1999 c 27: “It is the intent of chapter 27, Laws of 1999 to clarify that electronic communications are included in the types of conduct and actions that can constitute the crimes of harassment and stalking. It is not the intent of the legislature, by adoption of chapter 27, Laws of 1999, to restrict in any way the types of conduct or actions that can constitute harassment or stalking.” [ 1999 c 27 § 1.]
    Severability—1992 c 186: See note following RCW 9A.46.110.

    9A.46.030
    Place where committed.

    Any harassment offense committed as set forth in RCW 9A.46.020 or 9A.46.110 may be deemed to have been committed where the conduct occurred or at the place from which the threat or threats were made or at the place where the threats were received.
    [ 1992 c 186 § 3; 1985 c 288 § 3.]
    NOTES:
    Severability—1992 c 186: See note following RCW 9A.46.110.

    9A.46.040
    Court-ordered requirements upon person charged with crime—Violation.

    (1) Because of the likelihood of repeated harassment directed at those who have been victims of harassment in the past, when any defendant charged with a crime involving harassment is released from custody before trial on bail or personal recognizance, the court authorizing the release may issue an order pursuant to this chapter and require that the defendant:
    (a) Stay away from the home, school, business, or place of employment of the victim or victims of the alleged offense or other location, as shall be specifically named by the court in the order;
    (b) Refrain from contacting, intimidating, threatening, or otherwise interfering with the victim or victims of the alleged offense and such other persons, including but not limited to members of the family or household of the victim, as shall be specifically named by the court in the order.
    (2) Willful violation of a court order issued under this section or an equivalent local ordinance is a gross misdemeanor. The written order releasing the defendant shall contain the court’s directives and shall bear the legend: Violation of this order is a criminal offense under chapter 9A.46 RCW. A certified copy of the order shall be provided to the victim by the clerk of the court.
    (3) If the defendant is charged with the crime of stalking or any other stalking-related offense under RCW 9A.46.060, and the court issues an order protecting the victim, the court shall issue a stalking no-contact order pursuant to chapter 7.92 RCW.
    [ 2013 c 84 § 27; 2012 c 223 § 1; 2011 c 307 § 4; 1985 c 288 § 4.]

    9A.46.050
    Arraignment—No-contact order.

    A defendant who is charged by citation, complaint, or information with an offense involving harassment and not arrested shall appear in court for arraignment in person as soon as practicable, but in no event later than fourteen days after the next day on which court is in session following the issuance of the citation or the filing of the complaint or information. At that appearance, the court shall determine the necessity of imposing a no-contact or no-harassment order, and consider the provisions of RCW 9.41.800, or other conditions of pretrial release according to the procedures established by court rule for preliminary appearance or an arraignment.
    [ 1994 sp.s. c 7 § 447; 1985 c 288 § 5.]
    NOTES:
    Finding—Intent—Severability—1994 sp.s. c 7: See notes following RCW 43.70.540.
    Effective date—1994 sp.s. c 7 §§ 401-410, 413-416, 418-437, and 439-460: See note following RCW 9.41.010.

    9A.46.060
    Crimes included in harassment.

    As used in this chapter, “harassment” may include but is not limited to any of the following crimes:
    (1) Harassment (RCW 9A.46.020);
    (2) Malicious harassment (RCW 9A.36.080);
    (3) Telephone harassment (RCW 9.61.230);
    (4) Assault in the first degree (RCW 9A.36.011);
    (5) Assault of a child in the first degree (RCW 9A.36.120);
    (6) Assault in the second degree (RCW 9A.36.021);
    (7) Assault of a child in the second degree (RCW 9A.36.130);
    (8) Assault in the fourth degree (RCW 9A.36.041);
    (9) Reckless endangerment (RCW 9A.36.050);
    (10) Extortion in the first degree (RCW 9A.56.120);
    (11) Extortion in the second degree (RCW 9A.56.130);
    (12) Coercion (RCW 9A.36.070);
    (13) Burglary in the first degree (RCW 9A.52.020);
    (14) Burglary in the second degree (RCW 9A.52.030);
    (15) Criminal trespass in the first degree (RCW 9A.52.070);
    (16) Criminal trespass in the second degree (RCW 9A.52.080);
    (17) Malicious mischief in the first degree (RCW 9A.48.070);
    (18) Malicious mischief in the second degree (RCW 9A.48.080);
    (19) Malicious mischief in the third degree (RCW 9A.48.090);
    (20) Kidnapping in the first degree (RCW 9A.40.020);
    (21) Kidnapping in the second degree (RCW 9A.40.030);
    (22) Unlawful imprisonment (RCW 9A.40.040);
    (23) Rape in the first degree (RCW 9A.44.040);
    (24) Rape in the second degree (RCW 9A.44.050);
    (25) Rape in the third degree (RCW 9A.44.060);
    (26) Indecent liberties (RCW 9A.44.100);
    (27) Rape of a child in the first degree (RCW 9A.44.073);
    (28) Rape of a child in the second degree (RCW 9A.44.076);
    (29) Rape of a child in the third degree (RCW 9A.44.079);
    (30) Child molestation in the first degree (RCW 9A.44.083);
    (31) Child molestation in the second degree (RCW 9A.44.086);
    (32) Child molestation in the third degree (RCW 9A.44.089);
    (33) Stalking (RCW 9A.46.110);
    (34) Cyberstalking (RCW 9.61.260);
    (35) Residential burglary (RCW 9A.52.025);
    (36) Violation of a temporary, permanent, or final protective order issued pursuant to chapter 7.90, 9A.46, 10.14, 10.99, 26.09, or 26.50 RCW;
    (37) Unlawful discharge of a laser in the first degree (RCW 9A.49.020); and
    (38) Unlawful discharge of a laser in the second degree (RCW 9A.49.030).
    [ 2006 c 138 § 21; 2004 c 94 § 4; 1999 c 180 § 7; 1997 c 338 § 52. Prior: 1994 c 271 § 802; 1994 c 121 § 2; prior: 1992 c 186 § 4; 1992 c 145 § 12; 1988 c 145 § 15; 1985 c 288 § 6.]
    NOTES:

    Like

  55. Georgie Porgie August 30, 2016 at 1:59 PM #

    FOR GOD’S SAKE
    GET LOSS DO

    Like

  56. Poetic Justice August 30, 2016 at 2:01 PM #

    Cyberstalking, harassement, revenge porn are all considered gross misdemeanors in the state of Washington where Ms Cutting is residing two years to file law is law as you see above electronic communications included in this and a non resident by Washington law has longer length to file law is law and breaking the law is a crime cyber stalking, harassing , revenge porn etc all are laws she has broken and she continues to even in her own words screensaved admit to such guilt. I will file on her in Washington state and she can get herself a lawyer the more she abuses her victims the stronger the case against her is she can explain why she does what she does . I hope she gets help because she has causes unecessary mental anguish for those she abuses , taunts and terrorizes this was and is her intention to cause and inflict emotional duress on those she cyberbullies and victimizes.

    Like

  57. ac August 30, 2016 at 2:17 PM #

    Georgie Porgie. Yuh pervert u get loss. Yuh moniker tells alot about you.

    Like

  58. bajans August 30, 2016 at 2:59 PM #

    @Poetic Justice

    Wait until if and when you win your case/cases and then tell us the results. NO ONE is reading your grievances. The site is hers, but she has anonymous posters. that is why we, including you, post here under nom-de-plumes.

    Like

  59. Violet C Beckles August 30, 2016 at 3:01 PM #

    why dont you all focus on the crooks in bim as none of you want to address, Those of you run from the white man raping you to someone who let you know what the paid news in Bim dont want you to know. So have your poster gone to far in the wrong direction? people are robbed each day in Bim and none of you seem to focus on cleaning up the crook, liars and scumbags Ministers from the PM down , Over taxing, can get deeds, cant show equal law enforcement , What must be in the water in Bim for the Yard Chicken heads that cant speak for self or defend self, Lawyers and Ministers need to study who they covering up for,

    Can not blame ND, If you a bajan, you heard must more in the streets and you call yourself good people, nothing more than suckers for white lies coming out of black mouths, Paid slaves ,
    BU need to call out the crooks , state the truth on land fraud, restore the records removed on the BU cover up, Using ND as a reason Violet Beckles information on land fraud, Seem the Harris family is much bigger than we know.

    Like

  60. Poetic Justice August 30, 2016 at 4:03 PM #

    She is sole propeitor of website and as you see in electronics communications violations a website owner in California was charged for republishing defamatory and revenge porn.Word Press can have all the complaints sent to them subpoened. Some of the comments LEO law enforcement acess to FBI files say are from her IP they know where she is at and as stated state she is doing this in two years for statute of limitations to file and once the no contact , retraining order and protective order are issued and charges made any other electronic communication after order is in effect becomes felony charges. She ( herself) had made direct threats on the internet. The fact she spends time, effort to release all the information on seach engines and other social media sites shows she is intending to cause humilation and malicious harm intent for victims. Cease and desist does not work neither does asking for empathy. This is not her wanting to expose alledged land fraud because most her articles have little to nothing to do with this subject. More a personal vendetta and retaliation revenge even to those who never hurt or harmed her are only caught in cross fires and considered collateral damage and unless you have been stalked, harassed, cyber bullied, badgered and intimidated violated you will never know why there are now laws to make this a federal crime and laws to protect victims and now as some states the first warnings are misdemeanors some states felonies. Some states want to make these crimes felonies in every jurisdiction and state. I never knew what teens who suffered this and some who even committed suicide actually felt at the hands of their abusers. I would see and read stories and tears but when you experience cyber abuse terrorism bully up close and personal you feel and you feel that hurt and then get thrown into something you wish to be no part of/.

    Like

  61. Bush Tea August 30, 2016 at 8:33 PM #

    LOL @ GP
    Don’t you recognise the psycho from a previous blog…?

    Like

  62. Bajansis September 12, 2016 at 5:47 PM #

    Poetic Justice while I sympathize with you I think you are going overboard in running after Sheri Veronica. Use your energy to go after the person or persons who violated you physically. ND did not commit the sin of rape.As a Barbadian I am ashamed of stories in ND. I actually know a lot of them are true.I am ashamed of not speaking out on some issues myself or pushing to expose more myself. My only problem with ND is that it paints all of us with the same brush,but maybe it is time for Barbadians to clean up their act.

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: