Clare Cowan

Guernsey Registered Cahill Energy Registration Documents, EXPOSED!

Who or what is Cahill Energy? Barbadians taxpayers want to know!

Who or what is Cahill Energy? Barbadians taxpayers want to know!

We hope the traditional media become involved soon and perform the task a healthy democracy deserves.

[…]

Tags: , ,

73 Comments on “Guernsey Registered Cahill Energy Registration Documents, EXPOSED!”

  1. Violet C Beckles July 23, 2015 at 6:26 PM #

    All of the dam are crooks,liars and scumbags, nothing they can say or do to clean up , But to leave the island and office.

    Like

  2. Guy Fox July 23, 2015 at 6:44 PM #

    90/10 split between the two companies. Westminster Nominees Limited has 90% of the shares in Cahill and is an old company. Lambeth Nominees Limited has 10% of the shares in Cahill is a BRAND NEW COMPANY incorporated in April 2014. The finders fees is 10% I guess but who is the owner of this money? It could be worth tens of millions of and when Cahill Barbados is sold the the highest bidder.

    Like

  3. David July 23, 2015 at 7:24 PM #

    @Guy Fox

    The question which should have been asked last night is whether the 10% shareholding is a ‘çut’?

    Like

  4. Guy Fox July 23, 2015 at 7:59 PM #

    The Bribery Act 2010 was introduced to update and enhance UK law on bribery including foreign bribery in order to address better the requirements of the 1997 OECD anti-bribery Convention. It is now among the strictest legislation internationally on bribery. Notably, it introduces a new strict liability offence for companies and partnerships of failing to prevent bribery.

    Like

  5. SuckaBubby July 23, 2015 at 8:03 PM #

    Why I get the feeling no plant was never to be built but a complex heist/ money laundering racket to go in excess of a billion dollars.

    Like

  6. Due Diligence July 23, 2015 at 8:05 PM #

    Can the sleuth who dug up these docs, now dig up the identity of the beneficial owners of Westminster and Lambeth?

    Like

  7. Alvin Cummins July 23, 2015 at 8:10 PM #

    @David,
    the so called video is a waste of time.

    Like

  8. Guy Fox July 23, 2015 at 8:10 PM #

    The beneficial owners of Guernsey must know the risks associated with operating from a UK regulated jurisdiction

    Like

  9. St George's Dragon July 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM #

    The Bribery Act 2010 does not apply in Guernsey as it’s not part of the UK. Guernsey has its own anti-bribery law. Interestingly, there doesn’t ever seem to have been a conviction for bribery or corruption under Guernsey law.
    I have always wondered why people run businesses out of places like Guernsey. It must be advantageous tax laws, I guess.

    Like

  10. David July 24, 2015 at 12:02 AM #

    Bajan Reporter had done an exhaustive write up:

    http://www.bajanreporter.com/2015/07/cahill-energy-proposed-waste-to-energy-is-a-waste-of-time-not-barbados/

    Like

  11. Tell me Why July 24, 2015 at 1:50 AM #

    Who will stand the responsibility of a failed transaction. Will the Government be able to recover any monies if this plant failed or if citizens are affected by any calamity.

    This section within the Articles of Incorporation says it all.

    “20 Indemnity

    20.1 The directors, secretary and other officers or employees of the company shall be indemnified out of the assets of the company to the fullest extent permitted by the Law from and against all actions, costs, charges, losses, damages and expenses which they or any of them may incur or sustain by reason of any contract entered into or any act done, concurred in or omitted, in or about the execution of their duty or supposed duty or in relation thereto.

    20.2 An alternate director is entitled to be indemnified under this clause as if he were a director”

    Like

  12. LBH July 24, 2015 at 2:55 AM #

    The current situation makes the indemnity clauses irrelevant this is a shell company with zero assets right now.and my guess is an mountain of debts.
    Cahill is banking on a quick sale to a company with deeper pockets they will walk away with millions and the people of Barbados will be left to pick up the pieces

    Shame on them all

    Like

  13. Exclaimer July 24, 2015 at 3:43 AM #

    The lady (carpet bagger) with the big hair was asked by a member of the audience as to why Barbados was selected ahead of other Caribbean countries with regard to this project. This was her reply:

    “Barbados has an educated population, which is really important . . . . Also, Barbados is an international business centre. That’s very important when you are running a business like this, that you can conduct normal business in a normal way. So Barbados was the ideal choice,” Cowan explained. Source: Barbados Today

    If someone could explain to me the word normal as used in this context then I would be most grateful.

    Good day to all.

    Like

  14. PT@ July 24, 2015 at 4:00 AM #

    Does anyone know if the Canadian tax code is like the US tax code where by Cahill would have to declare its offshore earnings ??? And has Cahill or the cowan woman filed a correct tax return declaring her interest in this off shore shell company/tax haven

    Like

  15. PT@ July 24, 2015 at 4:34 AM #

    Normal in this context means there was no selection process in this translation
    Seventh heaven property’s introduced her and she ran with it there was no bidding process this was a clear case of misuse of due process
    It maybe normal for her to scam people its not normal to the majority of people

    Like

  16. Hamilton Hill July 24, 2015 at 5:22 AM #

    “We hope traditional media becomes involved soon”. Hold your breath and see what happens. This has been a major part of the problem afflicting this country. As they say, who pays the piper calls the tune. …..and controls the press as well. This CAHILL debacle brings sharply into focus the important role SOCIAL MEDIA plays in the attempt to keep tabs on the purse strings of cash strapped Barbados. THIEVES HATE IT. RIGHT DENNIS? HOW ABOUT YOU MICHAEL?

    Liked by 1 person

  17. David July 24, 2015 at 5:44 AM #

    If it is a shell. Where has the money been coming from to contract the consultants?

    Like

  18. ac July 24, 2015 at 6:20 AM #

    Speaking of Transparency and documentation lest we forget , The public is still awaiting MIA MOTTLEY DOCUMENTATION of Proof of her LEC. NO!

    Like

  19. Guy Fox July 24, 2015 at 6:32 AM #

    David
    You can be certain that all of the money spend this far has come from money advanced to Cahill or its consultants from the GOB, the SSA or both.

    Like

  20. David July 24, 2015 at 6:35 AM #

    @Guy Fawkes

    How is that possible? Don’t we have Estimates and Heads where monies spent must be explained?

    Like

  21. David July 24, 2015 at 6:39 AM #
    Future Trust Meeting

    Future Trust Meeting

    Like

  22. Hamilton Hill July 24, 2015 at 6:51 AM #

    That was never promised by Mia.Transparency legislation was. An investigation into vote buying and selling, a major threat to the foundation of our democracy was. Should that not be the starting point of the quest for discovery?

    Like

  23. Hamilton Hill July 24, 2015 at 6:59 AM #

    Barbadians you can relax. The only impending tsunami is one over which you will have total control. That’s when for the first time in this country’s history a government in its entirety is wiped away. In one voice we will sing OH HAPPY DAY!

    Like

  24. David July 24, 2015 at 7:02 AM #

    @Hamilton

    This is how you are able to identify yard fowls and political rhetoric. It is why we are closely Jamaica and Trinidad, political.polarization.

    Like

  25. islandgal246 July 24, 2015 at 7:29 AM #

    ““Barbados has an educated population, which is really important . . . . Also, Barbados is an international business centre. That’s very important when you are running a business like this, that you can conduct normal business in a normal way. So Barbados was the ideal choice,”

    Exclaimer this is what normal means…….Barbados has a population of docile black sheep which is really important…..Also Barbados is an international business centre. That’s very important when you are running a business like this you can get away with murder by greasing the hands of government officials that you can conduct business in a normal way. So Barbados was the ideal choice where the government will allow anybody that is white and corrupt come in and do business.

    Like

  26. Enuff July 24, 2015 at 8:03 AM #

    This is the same Denis Lowe that convinced BU entire houses were missing from UDC and he would prove large scale corruption in a then ongoing forensic audit. Even when the government was staring defeat in the 2013 nary a word/evidence about this forensic audit or the many other alleged infelicities repeated before and after the 2008 election. In the last Budget, the same goodly doctor resorted to an LEC, Crab Hill and cola syrup from the last millenium. Why do we expect a sow to pur?

    Like

  27. Simple Simon July 24, 2015 at 8:21 AM #

    @ac July 24, 2015 at 6:20 AM “Speaking of Transparency and documentation lest we forget , The public is still awaiting MIA MOTTLEY DOCUMENTATION of Proof of her LEC. NO!”

    ac shut up we tired ‘a hearing u.

    Dear David blogmaster: I apologize to you for being so sharp with the ac consortium so earl in the morning.

    Like

  28. Simple Simon July 24, 2015 at 8:27 AM #

    http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/menu-eng.html
    Canadian Revenue Agency

    Like

  29. Simple Simon July 24, 2015 at 8:29 AM #

    http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/nnrsdnts/bsnss/menu-eng.html
    Canadian Revenue Agency. Information for Businesses – International and non-resident taxes

    Like

  30. Simple Simon July 24, 2015 at 8:31 AM #

    http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/nnrsdnts/bsnss/crp-eng.html
    Canadain Revenue Agency. Income tax information for non-resident corporations

    Like

  31. Simple Simon July 24, 2015 at 8:35 AM #

    http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/gncy/nvstgtns/lds/menu-eng.html

    If these folks are up to any hanky-panky the Canada Revenue Agency will be happy to hear from you:

    Informant Leads Program
    As announced in Economic Action Plan 2013, the CRA has launched the Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) that offers financial awards to individuals with information about major cases of international tax non-compliance resulting in more than $100,000 of additional federal tax being assessed and collected. Please visit the OTIP website for more information, including how to make a submission.

    Beware of fraudulent communications:
    The CRA is warning Canadians that fraudulent emails purporting to be from the Agency are currently circulating. See examples of these scams.

    The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) takes abuse of Canada’s tax laws very seriously. When an individual or business does not fully comply with tax legislation, an unfair burden is placed on law-abiding taxpayers and businesses and the integrity of Canada’s tax base is jeopardized.

    The mandate of the Informant Leads Program is to coordinate all leads that the CRA receives from informants, to determine if there is an element of non-compliance with tax legislation, and ensure that the information is reviewed and provided to the corresponding compliance program for appropriate enforcement action.

    For more information, see Frequently asked questions.

    How to report suspected tax evasion
    You can report suspected tax evasion over the Internet or by contacting the National Leads Centre. Your identity will not be disclosed and you may provide information anonymously.

    Privacy notice

    What to tell us

    By Internet

    Report suspected tax evasion online:

    Before you start

    By phone, mail or fax

    Tel.: 1-866-809-6841 (toll free)
    Fax: 1-888-724-4829 (toll free)

    Office hours: 8:15 a.m. to 5:45 p.m. (Eastern Time).

    Mailing address:
    National Leads Centre
    Business Intelligence & Quality Assurance Division
    Canada Revenue Agency
    200 Town Centre Court
    Scarborough ON M1P 4Y3

    Like

  32. Simple Simon July 24, 2015 at 8:39 AM #

    Canada Revenue Agency. Offshore Tax Informant Program
    http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/gncy/cmplnc/otip-pdife/menu-eng.html

    The Government of Canada is committed to protecting Canada’s tax base and ensuring public confidence in the fairness and integrity of the tax system. Canadians are allowed to structure their tax affairs in such a way in order to reduce the amount of tax owing – Registered Retirement Savings Plans and Tax-Free Savings Accounts are two examples of legal, beneficial ways that Canadians can reduce their taxes owing.

    Investments outside the country are not illegal. Canadians who invest outside the country are in compliance with Canada’s tax laws as long as they report all of the income earned outside Canada.

    However, the Government of Canada and Canadian tax administrators are concerned about international financial transactions and mechanisms to avoid or evade Canadian tax. When an individual or business does not fully comply with tax legislation, an unfair burden is placed on law-abiding taxpayers and businesses and the integrity of Canada’s tax system is jeopardized.

    Launched as part of the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) efforts to fight international tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance, the new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) allows the CRA to make financial awards to individuals who provide information related to major international tax non-compliance that leads to the collection of taxes owing. The OTIP draws on international best practices from across the globe. A number of member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) also provide rewards for information regarding taxpayer non-compliance. The United States Internal Revenue Service, for example, has a Whistleblower Office that rewards individuals who come forward with information on major cases of tax evasion. International tax non-compliance is a focus of all developed nations, particularly members of the G-20, and the CRA’s actions to combat this non-compliance are part of this global effort.

    Like

  33. David July 24, 2015 at 8:42 AM #

    @Clare Cowan

    We know you follow BU, please feel free to interact with us to debunk the mythology.

    Like

  34. Due Diligence July 24, 2015 at 10:42 AM #

    Simple Simon

    Are you suggesting that M. E. Clare Cowan and/or the beneficial owners of Westminster or Lambeth Nominees are evading or illegally avoiding paying Canadian Income Tax by using a multi-level ownership structure via two countries in the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions, Geurnsey and Barbados?

    Like

  35. David July 24, 2015 at 10:59 AM #

    This Cahill transaction is reminiscent of the 3S issue under the BLP. What has changed? Twiddle D and Twiddle B.

    JAs

    Like

  36. David July 24, 2015 at 11:34 AM #

    @DD

    Have you been able to find a fingerprint on the Internet about the two shareholders?

    Like

  37. Trish O July 24, 2015 at 11:36 AM #

    These documents show that Cahill hasn’t been hiding anything! Why are Bagans so against new jobs and a better way of disposing of our garbage? Sure, we haven’t got all of the information about the plant yet but reports have said that the technology is safe and the company is making a concerted effort to answer our questions through the town hall meetings they’ve been hosting..

    Like

  38. Reuben Ramsay July 24, 2015 at 11:42 AM #

    We’re so quick to only consider the negatives and these documents have done little to clarify the situation. Maybe Cahill could provide the country with some exciting changes? Others are finally beginning to see that Barbados is a country worth investing in!

    Like

  39. R Husbands July 24, 2015 at 11:45 AM #

    These papers are a waste of time. All I care about is the future of my country… If Cahill Energy can produce clean energy for the country and provide my kids with jobs in the future, then I agree that Barbados is the right place for the plant.

    Like

  40. Vaucluse July 24, 2015 at 12:42 PM #

    We have a right to know who will control our energy supply, particularly when the company in question is the beneficiary of tax payer funded support.

    So, we may not yet know who the beneficiaries are, but we know the CEO is Mrs M.E. Clare Cowan.

    Is this the same M.E. Clare Cowan named as CEO of a company called Venture Exchange Network in this annual report filed with the SEC?

    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/vprr/04/9999999997-04-029165

    The same Clare Cowan that apparently had companies described as partners “baffled” to be associated with it?

    http://www.itbusiness.ca/news/venture-exchange-network-signs-up-heavy-hitters/2159

    “”Either it’s a mistake or… No one knows what Venture Exchange Network is or why our name is there.””

    The main office of Venture Exchange Network was 55 Queen Street East, Toronto – http://brokercheck.finra.org/Firm/127395

    A Google search shows that a few years earlier a Clare Cowan Poirier was Director of a company called 700068 Ontario Ltd which had its address on 12 Queen Street – https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_ns/2094961

    The same Clare Cowan?

    Records from the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia show that 700068 Ontario Ltd traded as Peartree Home Marketing Consultants – http://caselaw.canada.globe24h.com/0/0/nova-scotia/supreme-court-of-nova-scotia/1990/10/05/cleary-v-nova-scotia-attorney-general-1990-4152-ns-sc.shtml

    According to the court “the Peartree scheme may well lead to the homeowner being encouraged to sell his home by inexpert sales staff with no recourse and without the protection afforded by the Act.”

    Like

  41. islandgal246 July 24, 2015 at 12:59 PM #

    And now the Barmy Army has been sent in for support!

    Like

  42. Due Diligence July 24, 2015 at 1:00 PM #

    David July 24, 2015 at 11:34 AM #
    @DD

    “Have you been able to find a fingerprint on the Internet about the two shareholders?”

    Been looking, but no luck so far.

    Will keep trying.

    Like

  43. Guy Fox July 24, 2015 at 1:53 PM #

    Reuben
    Cahill is a scam, that’s why the crooks are trying to sell the bloody pig in the bag before getting it to market. So do use a favour an piss-off before Cahill and its scammers end up going the FIFA route. It does not take a lot to so the ball rolling.

    Like

  44. Due Diligence July 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM #

    Trish O July 24, 2015 at 11:36 AM #

    These documents show that Cahill hasn’t been hiding anything!

    How about hiding the names of beneficial owners?

    Clare Cowan is simply the front man.

    Like

  45. Hants July 24, 2015 at 3:11 PM #

    Due Diligence ,

    You are very perceptive. You mussee live in Canada an know bout lobbyin an silent partnerships an ting.

    Like

  46. Due Diligence July 24, 2015 at 3:40 PM #

    Hants

    You too are very perceptive.

    Except for what I have gleaned from other BU experts, DD has no expertise in WTE or any other sustainable energy stuff; but has a good nose to smell something fishy.

    This Canadian woman Cowan smells very fishy – like the suckers in the rivers up hey.

    Like

  47. David July 24, 2015 at 7:41 PM #

    @DD

    See Vacluse’s comment posted at 12:42 which went to spam.

    Like

  48. TheObserver July 25, 2015 at 11:56 AM #

    I am not a lawyer, economist or financial expert. I did not read all of the comments, but I did look at the links provided in the original post. I am hoping the one of you will educate me or correct my ignorance

    When I look at the monies in those documents I saw 0.00 or a maximum of 500 pounds. I saw (somewhere) where cash in hand was 259 pounds and the assets less than the liabilities.

    Given the sum of monies I have seen, are we talking about a $770.00 project or a $770 M dollars project. Can someone explain to me how the 10 links provided by David can lead to someone awardin a $770 M contract.

    Excuse my ignorance and educate me on the monies first. Throw in a few numbers with more than 5 digits or my mind will go blank again. I don’t want spin or party lines (Show me the money)

    Like

  49. Due Diligence July 26, 2015 at 1:04 PM #

    Re the 2004 Annual Audited Report of Venture Exchange Network, Inc filed with the SEC in the following link posted by Vaucluse July 24, 2015 at 12:42 PM #

    http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/vprr/04/9999999997-04-029165

    Total Assets = $30,649.
    Total Revenue = nil

    DD is guessing that the Cahill Balance Sheet has about the same level of assets and revenue.

    DD has Googled Venture Exchange Network, Inc. and its parent Goldcare Indutiae Inc. -which had registered the trademark MASTERMIND.

    Lots of hits on both names, but nothing substantive; just PR fluff and listings in business directories

    M. E Clare Cowan was the CEO of both.

    Goldcare was described as being a management consultant, and appears to have been active from mid 1990s to early 2000s

    Venture surfaced in about 2002, and was around until about 2004. On its website Venture Exchange Network describes itself as a revolutionary and interactive listing, screening and matching service for entrepreneurs, and private equity investors. We are determined to help entrepreneurs obtain venture financing while uncovering the best high technology companies for investors. Venture Exchange Network is the only service that screens entrepreneurs for minimum criteria and then uses a hands-on analysis and systematic approach to identify the venture capitalist most likely to provide funding to the new startup.

    Can find no details of any deals done by either.

    It is interesting that M. E.Clare Cowan seems to have left the face of the earth from 2004 until resurfacing in 2012 as CEO of Cahill Energy Limited (Guernsey), and then in Barbados in March 2014 announcing Cahill signed a historic agreement with the Government of Barbados on 15th March 2014 to build and operate a leading edge clean energy plant.

    DD would rely like to know what she was doing between 2004 and 2014.

    Like

  50. Guy Fox July 26, 2015 at 1:19 PM #

    Was she in detox or rehab?

    Like

  51. David July 26, 2015 at 1:55 PM #

    It is interesting when the environmental engineer was asked what experience he has of building a gasification plant he mentioned the one of similar scale (1,000 tones) being built in the UK.

    Like

  52. Guy Fox July 26, 2015 at 2:02 PM #

    Barbados could not even manage the evironmental issues/standards of the piss-ass little Mobil oil refinery at Needham’s (up to today the site is still contaminated) and now proposes a WTE project?
    David take sometime an produce some photos for the BU family of the Teeside Plasma Gasiification project so they can appreciate the scale and complexity of such a project.

    Like

  53. Guy Fox July 26, 2015 at 3:32 PM #

    Thanks David. And those photos do justice to the scale of this monster so I suggest the next time any Bajan passing near Middlesboro in the North of England l, they drop in and have a look (and smell) of this behemoth.

    Like

  54. St George's Dragon July 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM #

    This is the website for the plant itself:
    http://www.airproducts.co.uk/microsite/uk/teesvalley/index.htm
    Don’t be fooled by the picture of the field full of flowers at the top of the page, scroll down.

    Like

  55. David July 26, 2015 at 3:51 PM #

    Were we not told the vaporizing technology takes care of smell?

    Like

  56. Lazyboy July 26, 2015 at 4:39 PM #

    David
    It is interesting when the environmental engineer was asked what experience he has of building a gasification plant he mentioned the one of similar scale (1,000 tones) being built in the UK.
    That absolute horse shit
    He had little to do with the plant
    Airproducts ran the job
    AlterNrg the guys who supplied the gasifer had little to do with the construction. they didn’t even warranty the refractory in the gasifier and had NO involvement the monster duct at the top of the gasifier
    The jigsaw puzzle will have to be integrated by the chosen EPC contractor
    Which we can only assume has not been chosen yet
    Yet crazy clare says construction will start in September

    Like

  57. David July 26, 2015 at 4:45 PM #

    The site specific EIA will be started in July. How can the build start in September of the EIA had to be done?

    Like

  58. Lazyboy July 26, 2015 at 4:51 PM #

    Sarcasm
    This numpty woman has no clue what she is doing
    Maybe the discharged her to early from sunnybrook funny farm on bayview.

    Like

  59. Pat July 26, 2015 at 5:16 PM #

    Ottawa cancelled its relationship with a WTE facility called Plasco earlier this year.

    http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/plasco-energy-group-files-for-creditor-protection

    Like

  60. Pat July 26, 2015 at 5:19 PM #

    @Lazyboy July 26, 2015 at 4:51 PM #
    Sarcasm
    This numpty woman has no clue what she is doing
    Maybe the discharged her to early from sunnybrook funny farm on bayview.

    It is also possible she could have been in the Don jail.

    Like

  61. millertheanunnaki July 26, 2015 at 5:26 PM #

    @ David July 26, 2015 at 4:45 PM

    Who are the investors behind this phantom WTE project?

    It will never get off the ground unless financing is secured. Why are the proponents of the WTE not discussing the financing plans and agreements?

    Has the government received any invoices so far for consultancy fees from Ms Cowan and her clique?

    Like

  62. David July 26, 2015 at 5:29 PM #

    @Miller

    We have heard there is a signed agreement between Cahill and government the details which have been guarded by the NDA response. It is/will be up to the government to enforce.

    Like

  63. Lazyboy July 26, 2015 at 6:02 PM #

    Crazy lady is hiding behind the thin veil of an NDA she says is in place
    Have the four amigos made the same claim re the Existence of said NDA.
    I can’t find any exchange where they try and hide behind this famous NDA.

    Like

  64. Peter July 26, 2015 at 6:12 PM #

    All of this talk about getting Bajans to recycle, compose and separate garbage and public education is a fantasy, will never happen. Nothing ain’t more damaging to the environment than de dump at arch hall and yet de national trust ain’t protesting against that but they and de yard fowls protesting against a project they ain’t know nothing about and only going on what they hearing other people say. People do your own research on plasma grasification and look for de benefits rather than seeing all negative. Are we going to build this plant now and be leaders or wait 15 years when everybody else has one and then trying to catch up

    Like

  65. Due Diligence July 26, 2015 at 6:15 PM #

    Pat July 26, 2015 at 5:19 PM #

    That had also occurred to me

    Like

  66. onlooker July 26, 2015 at 6:17 PM #

    It appears .ms. Cowan was told she could get some easy money from a bunch of follows who want to get rich quick. Some people still see Barbados as a third world nation that can be easily fooled. Ms. Cowan, wheel and come again, what you didn’t cater to is intelligent bajans that are much more sensible than you

    Like

  67. David July 26, 2015 at 6:41 PM #

    It appear if we understand Peter’s comment above Barbadians should live up to their reputation as being some of the most docile in the Caribbean.

    On 26 July 2015 at 22:17, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >

    Like

  68. Bush Tea July 26, 2015 at 8:23 PM #

    @ David
    …name a single ‘Peter’ with sense….🙂

    Like

  69. David July 26, 2015 at 8:31 PM #

    @Bushie

    Peter Pan doesn’t set the bar very high🙂

    Like

  70. Simple Simon July 26, 2015 at 11:24 PM #

    @David July 26, 2015 at 6:41 PM “Barbadians should live up to their reputation as being some of the most docile in the Caribbean.”

    Bajans are not docile.

    Bajans have never been docile.

    Bajans are passive/agressive.

    Likely the most passive/aggressive people on the face of the earth.

    As the Cahill people are finding out.

    Like

  71. Bush Tea July 28, 2015 at 3:31 PM #

    @ Simple Simon
    Likely the most passive/aggressive people on the face of the earth.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Nonsense!!
    You ever met ANY Jamaican?
    …or been to Jamaica?

    Like

Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: